To protect your idea/product using patents is OK but using them to stop innovations is a dark side. How to define the balance between using patents as weapons and using them to secure investments is the big question. If your innovative project uses something well-known, but adds the essence on top of that, do you have to pay a license for all the bricks you use?
To protect your idea/product using patents is OK but using them to stop innovations is a dark side. How to define the balance between using patents as weapons and using them to secure investments is the big question. If your innovative project uses something well-known, but adds the essence on top of that, do you have to pay a license for all the bricks you use?
This is a simple, well not so simple, project for making programming microcontrollers easy, without to know anything about C/C++, compilers, etc.
The main idea is to use web-based tools to make program, debug them and deploy on your hardware. It is REST-API based so you can make HTML based dashboards and control your programs remotely.
I'm just curious what you think?