And the reason for that is the authors make their living through payouts from corporations for help with DNS.
If DNS becomes more "DIY" they will not be able to pay themselves, via tax-exempt 501(c)(3) corporations, the same inflated annual salary. Their DNS consulting businesses will take a hit. And they'll no longer be able to charge thousands of dollars for giving presentations about DNS and its flaws.
Some House hearings have transcripts at judiciary.house.gov/hearings/transcripts/. But not this one.
I decided to read the bill instead. I highly recommend it. The definitions alone are worth the read.
What if content is not addressed to a "location"?
What if there is no "site"?
What if a network is not accesible to the public?