Nobody Knows What an iPad Is Good for Anymore(wired.com)
wired.com
Nobody Knows What an iPad Is Good for Anymore
http://www.wired.com/2015/01/nobody-knows-ipad-good-anymore/
67 comments
Same story here. My mom was also an IT support headache (for me) and now on her iPad she forwards me email, photos (a new headache) uses it for Skype and other connectivity tools. I told her to buy a new laptop, she said everything she needs to do iPad can do it. She likes it so much that she bought my grandmother an iPad...
I agree about the title. As best I can tell, when they say "nobody" they mean "nobody in the marketing department." In short, there's no single overarching theme that describes what iPads are good at, so it's hard to advertise.
Personally, I use my iPad pretty much the same as you do. When it comes to casual web browsing, reading, or videos, the experience is a lot better than a laptop.
Personally, I use my iPad pretty much the same as you do. When it comes to casual web browsing, reading, or videos, the experience is a lot better than a laptop.
I agree about the title. As best I can tell, when
they say "nobody" they mean "nobody in the marketing
department." In short, there's no single overarching
theme that describes what iPads are good at, so it's
hard to advertise.
And we continue to be surprised by them not undertanding it.
I'm no longer surprised by any of the foolishness that journalists get up to, but it's still fun to point it out.
Well, number 1, an iPad is good for reducing the amount of free tech support you do for your parents, at least in my case. Reducing doesn't mean eliminating, unfortunately, but buying my parents iPads was still some of the best money I ever spent.
I have three iPads myself. I use two of them every single day, for work, for entertainment, for study, for the weather, etc.
btw, Apple just announced a record quarter with incredible iPad sales. For whatever reason, Apple has a very odd history with the press. You basically shouldn't bother with any story about Apple unless it comes from Daring Fireball. He's kind of an Apple cheerleader, but he also seems to be the only person in the world who will fact-check a story about Apple before publishing it.
I have three iPads myself. I use two of them every single day, for work, for entertainment, for study, for the weather, etc.
btw, Apple just announced a record quarter with incredible iPad sales. For whatever reason, Apple has a very odd history with the press. You basically shouldn't bother with any story about Apple unless it comes from Daring Fireball. He's kind of an Apple cheerleader, but he also seems to be the only person in the world who will fact-check a story about Apple before publishing it.
I really dislike the idea that people need to be told what they should use their technology for. Tablets are just computers and they run software, like every other computer. What you do with it is up to your imagination.
My girlfriend and I keep an iPad plugged into our stereo receiver via an auxiliary cable and use it as a Spotify terminal. My dad's iPad is his primary computing device. It seems like a lot of other people in this thread have similar stories. So, clearly, saying "nobody" knows what an iPad is good for is a little bit of a stretch.
My girlfriend and I keep an iPad plugged into our stereo receiver via an auxiliary cable and use it as a Spotify terminal. My dad's iPad is his primary computing device. It seems like a lot of other people in this thread have similar stories. So, clearly, saying "nobody" knows what an iPad is good for is a little bit of a stretch.
Another example: Toddlers love iPads. I've talked to new parents who are astonished how easily their 15-month-olds navigate the Youtube iPad app (most of them set up playlists for their toddlers). There's also a huge collection of toddler-friendly games and apps.
I'm a developer, but my iPad is my primary computing device while at home. My laptop died about a year ago, and I decided to save money and just use the iPad that I got as a Christmas bonus. About the only thing I ever feel I lack is legacy support for older Windows games. With the occasional keyboard pairing for longer emails, I would say that the only thing it really lacks is the ability to archive photos from my camera. Maybe I'm in the minority here in that I specifically don't do any development or really intense computing tasks at home, but I think that my use case mirrors much of the non-technical world. I know of many people who use iPads as their primary computing devices.
I think it's more accurate to say that tech journalists don't know what an iPad is good for anymore.
I think it's more accurate to say that tech journalists don't know what an iPad is good for anymore.
an interactive playbook for hockey coaches, a touchscreen map for storm chasers, a training assistant for sumo wrestlers, a field guide for identifying fish when you’re scuba diving, a cutting-edge tool for fixing wind turbines.
The author answers his own question...enterprise. iPads are seeing massive adoption in Architecture Construction and Engineering (Plangrid comes to mind), not to mention medical and insurance practice. Go to any enterprise rent a car and they are using tablets exclusively for contracts with clients.
The consumer/causal user use case may not be there but there is a real need to be able to take a powerful computer with you that has network capabilities, screen sharing/powerpoint display, cameras all without needing to lug around a keyboard and mouse (yes I consider a laptop lugging around).
Especially when you consider power on/off time there is a big difference in use case that makes it perfect for enterprise.
The author answers his own question...enterprise. iPads are seeing massive adoption in Architecture Construction and Engineering (Plangrid comes to mind), not to mention medical and insurance practice. Go to any enterprise rent a car and they are using tablets exclusively for contracts with clients.
The consumer/causal user use case may not be there but there is a real need to be able to take a powerful computer with you that has network capabilities, screen sharing/powerpoint display, cameras all without needing to lug around a keyboard and mouse (yes I consider a laptop lugging around).
Especially when you consider power on/off time there is a big difference in use case that makes it perfect for enterprise.
This is a dumb article. Sales growth has slowed because iPads are computers and don't have a 2 year repurchase cycle. There are only so many people out there who don't own a tablet of some kind and an iPad will last a lot longer than an iPhone.
The iPad 2 is still a very good tablet for a lot of people. Not a huge reason to upgrade until it breaks.
Also, nerds might not love it, but my wife adores her Kindle Fire HD and uses it all the time. For recipes, surfing the web, and watching videos, that is all she needs.
The iPad 2 is still a very good tablet for a lot of people. Not a huge reason to upgrade until it breaks.
Also, nerds might not love it, but my wife adores her Kindle Fire HD and uses it all the time. For recipes, surfing the web, and watching videos, that is all she needs.
I agree that the article is dumb. Apple sells two Ipads a second every second of every day of the year, which tells me a lot of people know exactly what an iPad is good for.
>> iPads are computers and don't have a 2 year repurchase cycle
If you regularly update to the latest OS release, you will barely get past the second year. In my experience, "the final major version OS to run on any iOS device" is generally annoyingly slow.
It might be better these days, but it wasn't the case with my original iPad, iPhone 3G and 4. I'm glad I told my wife not to update her 4S to 8 (i.e., the final major version that will be available for the 4S), because updating to 7 had already noticeably slowed down her phone.
If you regularly update to the latest OS release, you will barely get past the second year. In my experience, "the final major version OS to run on any iOS device" is generally annoyingly slow.
It might be better these days, but it wasn't the case with my original iPad, iPhone 3G and 4. I'm glad I told my wife not to update her 4S to 8 (i.e., the final major version that will be available for the 4S), because updating to 7 had already noticeably slowed down her phone.
There are literally millions of computers happily running Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, old versions of OS X, Android 2.x, and 2+ year old releases of Linux.
For what a lot of people do on computers, old software still works just fine. Yes, you don't get all the latest updates, but millions of people don't care at all. Certainly millions don't care enough to spend money to upgrade. More than that, a lot of people don't really notice the difference.
For what a lot of people do on computers, old software still works just fine. Yes, you don't get all the latest updates, but millions of people don't care at all. Certainly millions don't care enough to spend money to upgrade. More than that, a lot of people don't really notice the difference.
iPads are different, because Apple refuses to retire the iPad 2. Officially they don't sell it anymore, but they still sell the original iPad mini, which is just an iPad 2 with a smaller screen. iOS 8 needs to work well on an iPad 2 in a way that iOS 8 doesn't need to work well on an iPhone 4S.
I don't agree with the analogy. There's a bigger qualitative difference between PCs and mobile devices than between cars and trucks.
The need for a real PC has never gone away for me. A tablet or phone is something I can waste a little bit of time on or use on an airplane. They're great for that, but they're passive devices for consumption, not production.
Real work (anything that requires more than a small amount of input) and even real entertainment (playing a full-sized game, reading/watching longer pieces) is not comfortable for me on a mobile device. It would be a significant compromise to go without a real PC. The efforts to make a tablet act like a computer (like attaching a physical keyboard) don't go nearly far enough to bridge the gap.
The need for a real PC has never gone away for me. A tablet or phone is something I can waste a little bit of time on or use on an airplane. They're great for that, but they're passive devices for consumption, not production.
Real work (anything that requires more than a small amount of input) and even real entertainment (playing a full-sized game, reading/watching longer pieces) is not comfortable for me on a mobile device. It would be a significant compromise to go without a real PC. The efforts to make a tablet act like a computer (like attaching a physical keyboard) don't go nearly far enough to bridge the gap.
Based on what you said, I think the analogy still holds. You talk about work - that's the truck. Others talk about just browsing/Facebook/etc - that's the car.
iPads (and iPhones) are awesome for some stuff - if I want to send a "fax" I just take a photo and email/message it (say to my insurance company). Scanning documents on my desktop is... not easy. Even doing the exact same operation (take picture and send) is fraught with difficulty.
iPads (and iPhones) are awesome for some stuff - if I want to send a "fax" I just take a photo and email/message it (say to my insurance company). Scanning documents on my desktop is... not easy. Even doing the exact same operation (take picture and send) is fraught with difficulty.
they're passive devices for consumption, not production.
http://www.kylelambert.co.uk/ipad-art/
http://www.kylelambert.co.uk/ipad-art/
I can't use an iPad for much more than reading books, casual web browsing, casual chess and a game or two.
For work I split 75%/25% between a PC and Mac, both with multiple large high-resolution monitors, proper keyboards, trackballs and a Wacom tablet. I couldn't imagine coding on an iPad or working on anything serious enough. The closed nature of the platform, with lack of file system access, user accounts, peripheral connectivity and lack of expansion (memory being a key issue) makes the ipad inconvenient at best.
But wait! There's nothing whatsoever wrong with this scenario. I am perfectly happy with what the iPad does for me. Sure, it can't match my 16 core PC with 24gigs of SDRAM, three monitors and five hard drives. It doesn't have to!
Different devices for different uses. And the ipad is great for what I do with it. Ideal? No, of course. Editing text is a pain in the ass, the screen is too small and some websites absolutely suck on it (Please STOP disabling zoom!). The iPad is very useful. I am sure people outside engineering/design might find a lot more use out of it.
For work I split 75%/25% between a PC and Mac, both with multiple large high-resolution monitors, proper keyboards, trackballs and a Wacom tablet. I couldn't imagine coding on an iPad or working on anything serious enough. The closed nature of the platform, with lack of file system access, user accounts, peripheral connectivity and lack of expansion (memory being a key issue) makes the ipad inconvenient at best.
But wait! There's nothing whatsoever wrong with this scenario. I am perfectly happy with what the iPad does for me. Sure, it can't match my 16 core PC with 24gigs of SDRAM, three monitors and five hard drives. It doesn't have to!
Different devices for different uses. And the ipad is great for what I do with it. Ideal? No, of course. Editing text is a pain in the ass, the screen is too small and some websites absolutely suck on it (Please STOP disabling zoom!). The iPad is very useful. I am sure people outside engineering/design might find a lot more use out of it.
Not to mention it's much easier to lie in bed or on the couch with an ipad than with an awesome general computing setup...
Barring the title, the article touches upon some right notes. Ipad quarterly sales are down by about 21% YOY going by the latest quarterly earnings report from Apple (1). With the Iphone 6 and Iphone 6 plus coming out, I guess there's not much reason, except for certain use cases, for people to buy an Ipad. Apple surely recognizes that and is probably looking to reverse the trend with the rumored Ipad Pro (2).
(1) http://venturebeat.com/2015/01/27/apple-breaks-its-sales-rec...
(2) http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/ipad/big-screen-ipad-pro-plus...
(1) http://venturebeat.com/2015/01/27/apple-breaks-its-sales-rec...
(2) http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/ipad/big-screen-ipad-pro-plus...
Mu guess would be that iPad sales are down simply because a) hundreds of millions have been sold already, b) even more competing (primarily Android-based) tablets have been sold, and c) contrary to smartphones, tablets aren't typically bought on contract and replaced every few years, and they don't add nearly as much utility as a smartphone for someone who didn't have one before.
These 3 things combined indicate the market for tablets has been nearly saturated, and the majority of people who want one (and can afford it) already have one. The iPad has moved from 'growth market' into 'replacement market'. I know many people who are still using iPad 2's or even the original iPad, for example my mom still used the iPad 1 I gave her when I upgraded myself, so I'm not surprised Apple doesn't sell nearly as many iPad Air 2's as they sold iPad 1 or 2.
The article itself is pretty dumb if you ask me, and far too hung up on the truck/car analogy, and the premise that a device can only be useful or enjoyable if it replaces some other device like a phone or a laptop. I have a smartphone, tablet, laptop and a fixed desktop at home, but if my tablet died I would get a new one the same day. My laptop and desktop are far more likely to be replaced by a single device than my laptop/tablet or smartphone/tablet.
Just looking around I see iPad's everywhere, all the time. I see people who hate computers but love their tablets. The idea that declining sales imply they don't have a use is quite ridiculous.
These 3 things combined indicate the market for tablets has been nearly saturated, and the majority of people who want one (and can afford it) already have one. The iPad has moved from 'growth market' into 'replacement market'. I know many people who are still using iPad 2's or even the original iPad, for example my mom still used the iPad 1 I gave her when I upgraded myself, so I'm not surprised Apple doesn't sell nearly as many iPad Air 2's as they sold iPad 1 or 2.
The article itself is pretty dumb if you ask me, and far too hung up on the truck/car analogy, and the premise that a device can only be useful or enjoyable if it replaces some other device like a phone or a laptop. I have a smartphone, tablet, laptop and a fixed desktop at home, but if my tablet died I would get a new one the same day. My laptop and desktop are far more likely to be replaced by a single device than my laptop/tablet or smartphone/tablet.
Just looking around I see iPad's everywhere, all the time. I see people who hate computers but love their tablets. The idea that declining sales imply they don't have a use is quite ridiculous.
I agree with your point about market saturation and should have touched upon it in my original comment when I quoted the sales drop. One point that stood out for me was that the Ipad was originally envisioned to be something bigger than what it is turning out to be. It's a great device for consumption but not so much for creation (obviously there are exceptions). For creating stuff, people still need to turn to laptops/desktops. If the creation aspect could be addressed by the Ipad, then it would be huge and I think that's what Apple will try to do with their next version of the Ipad. MS probably already understands this and therefore the focus on the Surface tablets. Obviously, there would still be a need for laptops/desktops but it would be more of an exception than a rule.
I used to work for Gazelle, a company that buys used iPhones, iPads, etc. from consumers. We found that the iPads we bought were generally in much worse shape than the iPhones. We believed this suggested that people were using their iPads quite a bit. Anecdotally, among my friends and family iPads are in almost constant use. So even if we don't know what iPads are good for we seem to use them a lot.
I wonder how much of this is just that people are not upgrading their iPads as often as they upgrade their phones. I'm still relatively happy with my iPad 2 and I've had three different iPhones during the time I've owned it. A lot of my friends are in similar situations. I think we all kind of agree that iPads are too expensive to justify frequent upgrades, especially when they're still useable.
I bought an iPhone 6 Plus thinking it would replace the iPad but found that, while I still really like the 6 Plus' size, it doesn't really work that well for prolonged reading or the lazy internet surfing the author mentions in the article.
I wonder how much of this is just that people are not upgrading their iPads as often as they upgrade their phones. I'm still relatively happy with my iPad 2 and I've had three different iPhones during the time I've owned it. A lot of my friends are in similar situations. I think we all kind of agree that iPads are too expensive to justify frequent upgrades, especially when they're still useable.
I bought an iPhone 6 Plus thinking it would replace the iPad but found that, while I still really like the 6 Plus' size, it doesn't really work that well for prolonged reading or the lazy internet surfing the author mentions in the article.
I think your observations re: Gazelle point to the situation that telecom companies drive shorter upgrade cycles for phones, often hiding their cost and allowing three year upgrades. In contrast people generally pay full price for tablets, and upgrade less frequently.
Yes, that's definitely true. Plus iPads are not essential in the way phones are. They're luxury items.
The market for pads has peaked, right? Means people are using other things, not upgrading/replacing pads. Maybe because phones are bigger?
Looking at sales as an indicator of the success of a product is warped and silly. The fact that it is considered the right way is a shining example of the fundamentally flawed nature of our capitalist system.
Up until last year when he moved out, I continued to use my dad's first generation iPad while he used his new mini. The first generation iPad worked great, I used it all the time. I saw no reason to go and purchase one of the newer ones for myself other than the fact that I couldn't install iOS 7 on it. The software pushed obsolescence, not the hardware. My dad kept it when he moved out because it was still a great device.
A more accurate title would be "No one knows of any reason to buy the new generation iPads because their older ones are working just fine"
Up until last year when he moved out, I continued to use my dad's first generation iPad while he used his new mini. The first generation iPad worked great, I used it all the time. I saw no reason to go and purchase one of the newer ones for myself other than the fact that I couldn't install iOS 7 on it. The software pushed obsolescence, not the hardware. My dad kept it when he moved out because it was still a great device.
A more accurate title would be "No one knows of any reason to buy the new generation iPads because their older ones are working just fine"
It could just be that the market has saturated. Most people who want a tablet have one now, and there aren't compelling reasons to upgrade. This could spell trouble for tablet makers, but doesn't say anything bad about tablets themselves.
Just since it hasn't been mentioned - I'd never buy my kids an iPhone 6+ to share, but when our coming up on 4-years-old iPad2 finally becomes unfeasible we'll absolutely get a new iPad. Not to mention the general and more formal education market...
I agree, our 4 year old loves our iPad. Sure he could use a phone but the much bigger screen is great.
I also have some Windows 8 tablets, and sometimes he uses my MBP, but generally those are far too complex for young children. The iPad is great, and there is a wealth of great educational apps and games for kids.
I also have some Windows 8 tablets, and sometimes he uses my MBP, but generally those are far too complex for young children. The iPad is great, and there is a wealth of great educational apps and games for kids.
My son's school (Junior Kindergarten to Gr 5) uses iPads as part of their learning environment. We (the Parent Council) are helping fund the purchase of AppleTV devices for the classrooms so students can share what they're doing on the iPad with the whole class.
By all estimations from teachers and students alike, this has been a wonderful tool for teaching and learning.
Now, I don't own any apple products at all, so (having never held an iPad myself) I'm not really sure what they can actually do, so the question "what is this device good for" is one I cannot really answer from personal experience ... but I think in-school work is probably an excellent use-case.
By all estimations from teachers and students alike, this has been a wonderful tool for teaching and learning.
Now, I don't own any apple products at all, so (having never held an iPad myself) I'm not really sure what they can actually do, so the question "what is this device good for" is one I cannot really answer from personal experience ... but I think in-school work is probably an excellent use-case.
I had a discussion with a former co-worker that is the Lead for A/V and smart class rooms at my former work. They looked at Apple TV to do just that and decided that there were to many security/room for mischief issues for Apple TV. I can't remember who, but they are evaluating a air-play device that offers more granular control. might not be as big of a deal in k-5 as it is in higher ed though.
I had the same experience, I bough one and a week later I sent it back. It was annoying to hold on my lap because you can't put the screen at the angle you want, my macbook has 5hr plus battery life, it is on when I open it, it never has viruses, it just works... like an iPad.
My in laws however, who curse their windows machine when they have to reinstall every year because of unbearable slowness and crap piling up, that is a very different story.
My in laws however, who curse their windows machine when they have to reinstall every year because of unbearable slowness and crap piling up, that is a very different story.
Yeah, I feel bad for normal users who buy pc laptops. The come loaded with antivirus crapware that they threaten the user to buy after 30 days, and usually become virus laden and slow after a few months of use because normal users are so naive when downloading programs. For that reason alone, the Ipad is a better device for most people.
For me the killer app for an iPad is reading and highlighting/annotating documents. The ability to download a bunch of PDFs (in my case, mostly corporate filings) into a Dropbox folder, and immediately sync that folder to the iPad so I can start reading and highlighting (with changes automatically saved back to Dropbox) has completely changed my workflow, making me a lot more efficient.
strangely, in my experience, people under 25 and over 45 love ipads, whereas everyone between 25 and 45 really don't have a use for them (including myself).
wonder if this is a wider trend or i just have a very self-selected peer group (i'm early 30s). everyone in my social circle is 25-45 and either needs to type very quickly or wants nothing to do with computers or gadgets beyond the basics.
wonder if this is a wider trend or i just have a very self-selected peer group (i'm early 30s). everyone in my social circle is 25-45 and either needs to type very quickly or wants nothing to do with computers or gadgets beyond the basics.
This article certainly resonates with me. For a long time, tablets never made sense to me.
I've had 13" laptops for a decade now (iBook G4 12", MacBook 1st Gen Intel, Lenovo X220), and they were always highly portable and had decent battery life. Along came smartphones with ever increasing screen sizes, leading up to my trusty Note 2.
I've tried a number of tablets. 7" is too similar to my phone. 10" is too close to the laptop. I need a separate bag for it anyway, and it feels about as practical as the laptop at home. I never considered tablets being devices to work on, and I'm that guy who will use his laptop on the couch just because I'm still used to it.
Along came tablets with stylus. Being able to scribble and take notes on a screen just made sense, even if there was no OCR and it's all just bitmaps. I followed suit on the retina jump, switching from a 10" Android Thinkpad Tablet to a Note 10 2014. I have to say, the tablet with stylus is about the best computer I've ever used. I use it to display scores when singing, to draw bitmap sketches when designing, to read PDF and scribble away in it, etc.. LectureNotes is the killer app that made me buy into the whole device class.
Granted I still play Hearthstone on it, I watch Youtube and Twitch, I browse the web and do internet stuffs, but that would never be worth the maintenance effort of owning a separate device between my phone and my laptop. At some point I'd like to try a Windows Tablet, I heard they have better PDF viewers and decent OCR. iOS devices on the other hand feel completely out of place to me nowadays. Phones are nice if impractically small, but tablets are nothing more than beautiful toys, and they're all overpriced by a factor of 4 relative to the use I see in them. They'd be nice as a fourth device, but not as a first or second one.
I've had 13" laptops for a decade now (iBook G4 12", MacBook 1st Gen Intel, Lenovo X220), and they were always highly portable and had decent battery life. Along came smartphones with ever increasing screen sizes, leading up to my trusty Note 2.
I've tried a number of tablets. 7" is too similar to my phone. 10" is too close to the laptop. I need a separate bag for it anyway, and it feels about as practical as the laptop at home. I never considered tablets being devices to work on, and I'm that guy who will use his laptop on the couch just because I'm still used to it.
Along came tablets with stylus. Being able to scribble and take notes on a screen just made sense, even if there was no OCR and it's all just bitmaps. I followed suit on the retina jump, switching from a 10" Android Thinkpad Tablet to a Note 10 2014. I have to say, the tablet with stylus is about the best computer I've ever used. I use it to display scores when singing, to draw bitmap sketches when designing, to read PDF and scribble away in it, etc.. LectureNotes is the killer app that made me buy into the whole device class.
Granted I still play Hearthstone on it, I watch Youtube and Twitch, I browse the web and do internet stuffs, but that would never be worth the maintenance effort of owning a separate device between my phone and my laptop. At some point I'd like to try a Windows Tablet, I heard they have better PDF viewers and decent OCR. iOS devices on the other hand feel completely out of place to me nowadays. Phones are nice if impractically small, but tablets are nothing more than beautiful toys, and they're all overpriced by a factor of 4 relative to the use I see in them. They'd be nice as a fourth device, but not as a first or second one.
As a student, the iPad has changed my life. I no longer need to purchase giant 3 ½ pound tombs that cause back and shoulder pain. I just get them for my iPad and they're all on one lightweight device.
It just renders text books so perfectly. I have a smart phone, but there's no replacement for that big, 9.7 inch screen. It makes web pages and PDFs so pleasurable to read.
I think the sales have slowed because the upgrade cycle for tablets is similar to the upgrade cycle for computers. I've had my iPad with retina display for over 2 years and, unless it breaks, I don't see a reason to get a new one.
One side effect of having an iPad is that it has allowed me to have a clunkier PC life. I have a workstation set up with a 15inch MacBook, a second monitor, mount, usb hub, keyboard, mouse and the works. I no longer have to worry about its portability because I have my tablet.
It just renders text books so perfectly. I have a smart phone, but there's no replacement for that big, 9.7 inch screen. It makes web pages and PDFs so pleasurable to read.
I think the sales have slowed because the upgrade cycle for tablets is similar to the upgrade cycle for computers. I've had my iPad with retina display for over 2 years and, unless it breaks, I don't see a reason to get a new one.
One side effect of having an iPad is that it has allowed me to have a clunkier PC life. I have a workstation set up with a 15inch MacBook, a second monitor, mount, usb hub, keyboard, mouse and the works. I no longer have to worry about its portability because I have my tablet.
My computing devices are: an iphone (4s), an ipad (air 2), and a windows computer with a 27" monitor. I also have a kindle, but that's not general purpose.
I could probably replace the computer and ipad with a macbook, but 1) it would cost more money and 2) wouldn't be as mobile and easy to use as the ipad (for surfing in bed / on the couch, watching movies while eating, listening to music) or as usable as the windows computer (for coding and playing games) because of the smaller screen size and the relatively crappy keyboard / mouse. I could remedy the latter limitations with a docking station, separate monitor and keyboard, but now the solution is not just more expensive but much more expensive and even more cumbersome as compared to the ipad.
I could probably replace the computer and ipad with a macbook, but 1) it would cost more money and 2) wouldn't be as mobile and easy to use as the ipad (for surfing in bed / on the couch, watching movies while eating, listening to music) or as usable as the windows computer (for coding and playing games) because of the smaller screen size and the relatively crappy keyboard / mouse. I could remedy the latter limitations with a docking station, separate monitor and keyboard, but now the solution is not just more expensive but much more expensive and even more cumbersome as compared to the ipad.
The iPad is a tool for consumption rather than production. For those without an iPhone, I think the iPad is a terrific device for consuming content.
I think that if the iPad could serve to bridge the gap between consumption and production, then its place would be clear.
I own a Surface Pro 3 and I adore the ability to switch between consumption and production. However, its presentation and implementation leave a lot to be desired. It's often jarring switching between the clean Windows Store apps that were designed for touch, and the "Desktop" apps that dump you into the familiar, but frustrating, desktop where the mouse and keyboard dominate.
I feel that, if done well, a multipurpose device could supplant the incumbents.
I think that if the iPad could serve to bridge the gap between consumption and production, then its place would be clear.
I own a Surface Pro 3 and I adore the ability to switch between consumption and production. However, its presentation and implementation leave a lot to be desired. It's often jarring switching between the clean Windows Store apps that were designed for touch, and the "Desktop" apps that dump you into the familiar, but frustrating, desktop where the mouse and keyboard dominate.
I feel that, if done well, a multipurpose device could supplant the incumbents.
I use my ipad daily, for work and entertainment. When I'm working from home it's nice to have on my coffee table so I can see when I get a new email, or alert from the office. I leave my laptop in my office connected to a bigger monitor and would just go downstairs if I needed to reply to an email, or something. Then in the evening, I read hacker news, tv guide app, awesome Netflix/hulu remote with the chromecast. When I go to holidays at my relatives I always bring it to facetime my dad who lives in Hawaii. It's lite and easy to pass around the room so he can have a little visit.
I'm not able to write code or really produce much, but it's a great tool IMO.
I'm not able to write code or really produce much, but it's a great tool IMO.
I don't really buy this. I see literally dozens of people a day using tablets – mostly iPads. They're reading books, playing games, watching videos, using Facebook. I think it's pretty clear what it's good for.
I suspect that iPad sales have declined not as a result of the iPhone 6(+), but because the market is becoming saturated. There's little reason to upgrade past a certain point – sure, iPad 1 -> 2, and iPad 2 -> Retina were improvements. But aside from general performance improvements, there haven't been many changes since. In this situation, it's hard to see why most users would upgrade.
I suspect that iPad sales have declined not as a result of the iPhone 6(+), but because the market is becoming saturated. There's little reason to upgrade past a certain point – sure, iPad 1 -> 2, and iPad 2 -> Retina were improvements. But aside from general performance improvements, there haven't been many changes since. In this situation, it's hard to see why most users would upgrade.
The latest episode of 99% Invisible does a great job of covering this topic. I highly recommend it.
http://99percentinvisible.org/episode/of-mice-and-men/
A great analogy used in the piece (spoiler?) compared PCs to bicycles and tablets and phones to tricycles. Anyone can just hop on a tricycle and go around the block, but you need to learn and practice riding a bicycle. The thing is, you cannot commute to work on a tricycle. The counter argument is that modern smart phones and tablets are closer to 3-wheel recumbent bikes than tricycles.
http://99percentinvisible.org/episode/of-mice-and-men/
A great analogy used in the piece (spoiler?) compared PCs to bicycles and tablets and phones to tricycles. Anyone can just hop on a tricycle and go around the block, but you need to learn and practice riding a bicycle. The thing is, you cannot commute to work on a tricycle. The counter argument is that modern smart phones and tablets are closer to 3-wheel recumbent bikes than tricycles.
The biggest issue for me is: iCloud sync/Documents in the Cloud. When I used the iPad I had to manage my global/individual app settings daily and still found annoying holes where an both first and third-party apps wouldn't sync across my iCloud data. What's worse is that Apple doesn't give the user enough feedback when it's syncing data. (It's supposed to be magic, I suppose..)
I found that Third party sync services seemed worked much better than iCloud for me.
It just got too annoying. I couldn't ditch my iPhone, so the iPad had to go.
I found that Third party sync services seemed worked much better than iCloud for me.
It just got too annoying. I couldn't ditch my iPhone, so the iPad had to go.
I think it should replace all the textbooks in the university. It is incredible the amount of dead trees that goes into making all those textbooks that are in turn are very difficult to transport and use.
Perhaps textbook social learning app? Something, native, fast and reliable. So you can do your homework in your study group and have the results to be shared between all people in one place with a textbook.
I think iPad fell short with its textbook software - can someone make a platform. There is the issue of expensive and profitable dead tree textbooks though.
Perhaps textbook social learning app? Something, native, fast and reliable. So you can do your homework in your study group and have the results to be shared between all people in one place with a textbook.
I think iPad fell short with its textbook software - can someone make a platform. There is the issue of expensive and profitable dead tree textbooks though.
My Mom practically pays all her bills, watches youtube, does whatever she wants with her iPad. Same for other family members who aren't computer savvy and just need to get by.
It's fair to say that the initial enthusiasm and popularity of tablets is crashing to reality.
When they first came out they sold like crazy even though we didn't know what they were for.
Finally we are seeing where they can fit in, but it is less than we dreamed, partially supplanted by smartphones and phablets; and came at a significant cost after many failures.
As a result many people have tablets they don't and can't imagine using (myself included), anecdotal evidence that leads to mistaken conclusions.
When they first came out they sold like crazy even though we didn't know what they were for.
Finally we are seeing where they can fit in, but it is less than we dreamed, partially supplanted by smartphones and phablets; and came at a significant cost after many failures.
As a result many people have tablets they don't and can't imagine using (myself included), anecdotal evidence that leads to mistaken conclusions.
It's much better for reading, that alone is enough for me. I have a new big iPhone but still use my iPad to read every day.
My iPad Air is much better than any phablet for reading books on Kindle-and lets me honest, the way tablets and phones are designed these days, its not like carrying an iPad Air and my trusty 5s takes up a lot of weight or space. There's practically no weight/space penalty these days for carrying a dedicated phone and tablet.
It's an amazing platform for making music. The touch screen means every instrument can have it's own custom controller interface (used to need tons of hardware for hands-on tweaking).
Of course, it's also a great computer replacement for people who don't do much beyond surf/email/casual-game.
Of course, it's also a great computer replacement for people who don't do much beyond surf/email/casual-game.
Never found a use case with a tablet that worked for me. I have my main PC, a laptop and a large phone.
Then again I was never one to sit on a couch and watch tv with a laptop so I figured I was not in the right demographic for an ipad.
Then again I was never one to sit on a couch and watch tv with a laptop so I figured I was not in the right demographic for an ipad.
With Duet Display, it makes an excellent portable second monitor for a MacBook...
The iPad is good for letting me keep my work and play separate. I play on the iPad -- I work on my (linux) laptop.
Kids.
iPads are great consumption devices. But one place I've seen them that shocked me was as point of sale devices. They seem to be taking over the cash register market.
[deleted]
Did we ever know? I will concede that it was good for the random user doing some casual internet use while watching TV before phones got big enough for that, but I would contest if it ever had a single unique use other than that even at launch. Any device with a single purpose seems likely to fail, I think.
>Innovations like automatic transmission
I'd count that (or indeed, tablets) an 'innovation' in the same way as PRISM or systemd. Sure, it is one in that it's new and a different approach and even helps a very specific class of users, but not a net positive. I guess that's just the state of the world though, that we will always be forced to accept 'innovation' that does nothing but make life hard for the power user, the enthusiast, the person with an above-room-temperature IQ.
>had to be “far better” than a phone or a laptop
That's where it gets interesting, I think. As stated above, better than a phone contemporary to its launch, yes, but it was never better than a laptop bar "easier to pick up and carry around", which rarely applied to what are so often sofa-bound devices, or shoved into a backpack on a long journey at most.
>Innovations like automatic transmission
I'd count that (or indeed, tablets) an 'innovation' in the same way as PRISM or systemd. Sure, it is one in that it's new and a different approach and even helps a very specific class of users, but not a net positive. I guess that's just the state of the world though, that we will always be forced to accept 'innovation' that does nothing but make life hard for the power user, the enthusiast, the person with an above-room-temperature IQ.
>had to be “far better” than a phone or a laptop
That's where it gets interesting, I think. As stated above, better than a phone contemporary to its launch, yes, but it was never better than a laptop bar "easier to pick up and carry around", which rarely applied to what are so often sofa-bound devices, or shoved into a backpack on a long journey at most.
> I guess that's just the state of the world though, that we will always be forced to accept 'innovation' that does nothing but make life hard for the power user, the enthusiast, the person with an above-room-temperature IQ.
I like how not wanting to use computing devices in the same way you like to is a mental defect in your world. Wow.
I like how not wanting to use computing devices in the same way you like to is a mental defect in your world. Wow.
The way the GP put it is a little harsh, yes, but i can see where they're coming from. Personally, i think a device that "just works" is great. Really. For certain people (i agree, not low-IQ people, just non computer enthusiasts). And this is where the iPad shines. My gripe, though, would be that it doesn't cater to the power user who wants to modify components and software / create (whether that be a novel, a song, or a piece of software) in the same way that a general-purpose (and i'd go as far as to say open-source/libre software) computer does. I like hacking at my editor and being able to plug in an Arduino, and an iPad wouldn't let me do that.
Having said all of that, my response is: if that is a deal-breaker for you (like it is for me), don't buy an iPad. Simple. The iPad has it's target market very well defined and served (even if i do lament the fact that it's such a DRM / walled garden / evil spying companies experience, where the user is the product).
Having said all of that, my response is: if that is a deal-breaker for you (like it is for me), don't buy an iPad. Simple. The iPad has it's target market very well defined and served (even if i do lament the fact that it's such a DRM / walled garden / evil spying companies experience, where the user is the product).
Personally I think an iPad is unbeatable for many kinds of content consumption. I do 90% of my comics reading on mine, it's vastly better than the computer or phone for reading PDFs, it's great for playing casual games, it's decent for surfing the net. If I want to do content creation, I have a laptop for that. It's not about one device to rule them all, it's about finding the right device for the each job.
That said, I didn't have a functioning laptop last week, and I actually got a decent amount of programming done using my iPad, a bluetooth keyboard, and an SSH app. I'm pretty sure that if I were a regular Emacs or Vi user, I could use it quite happily for that on a regular basis.
That said, I didn't have a functioning laptop last week, and I actually got a decent amount of programming done using my iPad, a bluetooth keyboard, and an SSH app. I'm pretty sure that if I were a regular Emacs or Vi user, I could use it quite happily for that on a regular basis.
I can't really see where they're coming from. The existence of an easy tool doesn't eliminate the more powerful tools, and even advanced users sometimes want easy tools.
I'm a computer power user by any reasonable definition. I program for a living, I customize a lot of stuff, and I get pretty upset whenever I try to run an unsigned binary and my Mac decides this is too unsafe and makes me jump through hoops to make it happen.
But I also use my iPad a lot. If I'm reading on the couch or watching a video, it gets the job done much better.
It's fine to say that it's not for you, but it's ridiculous to say that simpler tools must only be for people who are incapable of using advanced tools.
I'm a computer power user by any reasonable definition. I program for a living, I customize a lot of stuff, and I get pretty upset whenever I try to run an unsigned binary and my Mac decides this is too unsafe and makes me jump through hoops to make it happen.
But I also use my iPad a lot. If I'm reading on the couch or watching a video, it gets the job done much better.
It's fine to say that it's not for you, but it's ridiculous to say that simpler tools must only be for people who are incapable of using advanced tools.
> I get pretty upset whenever I try to run an unsigned binary and my Mac decides this is too unsafe and makes me jump through hoops to make it happen.
In my experience, a simple right click -> open (as opposed to double click) gets the job done. Is this what you're refering to?
In my experience, a simple right click -> open (as opposed to double click) gets the job done. Is this what you're refering to?
Doesn't that only open it once, and if I want to keep using it I have to go flip the setting in System Preferences? And in Apple's infinite wisdom, that setting now resets if you haven't exercised it in a while, which is pretty crazy.
No, once you open it that way (on an admin account) it's supposed to allow you to open it normally from then on. I beleive you if you say it has bugged on you though.
Either way, I'll be sure to try it out next time I run into it and see what it does.
I am in my 30s and the iPad is pretty useful for me as a device that just works and provides access to books, the web and YouTube. Heck, we use it as an awesome remote when we cast YouTube or Netflix to our apple tv, ps3, chromecast, etc.