Korean Fan Death(istommydrunk.svbtle.com)
istommydrunk.svbtle.com
Korean Fan Death
http://istommydrunk.svbtle.com/sudden-fan-death
25 comments
It's funny that you're assuming that these people's statements are the exception to the rule and they're otherwise fairly open-minded and progressive. It seems like you're being presented with evidence to the contrary.
Presumably the word "otherwise" means if you disregard those closed-minded and non-progressive facets.
I'm talking about people I've known since before I was 10, so I can say I know them pretty well.
Edit: And don't even get me started about the ones who aren't progressive and open minded.
Edit: And don't even get me started about the ones who aren't progressive and open minded.
> Every fan in South Korea has an automatic shut-off feature - you can’t even buy a fan that will run all night. Impossible to purchase.
This statement is simply not true. I live in South Korea and I always run it all night in summer.
This statement is simply not true. I live in South Korea and I always run it all night in summer.
Hey serialx, I live in SK too, if you ever wanna grab a beer or coffee, shoot me an email: [email protected]
On Fan Death, the media bought it all up and publicized it on TV, naturally most South Koreans believe it. They are super conscious about anything related to health (even though smoking and binge drinking is quite common here).
If I have a cold, my wife (Korean) will tell me to go to the hospital. I grew up with not taking medicine unless it's absolutely necessary.
Back on topic, It's more of a culturally thing. I wouldn't bother trying to explain to people that it's not real, focus on feeling amused about the cultural difference.
Likwise, I'm from Australia, in my hometown (small beach town), I could walk to the local convenience store wearing no footware, no tshirt - just boxer shorts. To Korean people, they'd think I'm insane..... Just trying to highlight the differences in culture; seeing the humorous side of things is often better than trying to persuade someone they're wrong.
On Fan Death, the media bought it all up and publicized it on TV, naturally most South Koreans believe it. They are super conscious about anything related to health (even though smoking and binge drinking is quite common here).
If I have a cold, my wife (Korean) will tell me to go to the hospital. I grew up with not taking medicine unless it's absolutely necessary.
Back on topic, It's more of a culturally thing. I wouldn't bother trying to explain to people that it's not real, focus on feeling amused about the cultural difference.
Likwise, I'm from Australia, in my hometown (small beach town), I could walk to the local convenience store wearing no footware, no tshirt - just boxer shorts. To Korean people, they'd think I'm insane..... Just trying to highlight the differences in culture; seeing the humorous side of things is often better than trying to persuade someone they're wrong.
The last bit is so true it hurts. We have numerous shops and other places either in my apartment or right outside and I feel the need to dress up completely just to essentially go downstairs and get some snacks or diapers. I suppose a big reason it doesn't bother me much is that we get enough glances as it is, fully-dressed, so the last thing I want to do is invite more stares.
I've seen what I thought were American tourists in Italy going barefoot on the streets.
I and everybody else around them thought they are insane.
But yeah, I like to eat horse (and rabbit) meat while I would be looked upon with disgust in most parts of the world :)
But yeah, I like to eat horse (and rabbit) meat while I would be looked upon with disgust in most parts of the world :)
In China, getting an IV of saline solution is considered healthful. People will stop by the hospital for an IV drip even if they aren't sick. Has this infected Korea too?
I haven't seen this (and I've been in the hospital a LOT lately because we have two young boys -- it's common to bring your kids to the doctor over every little thing here) but I wouldn't be surprised at all if it's catching on in some areas.
Wait, boxer shorts?
I used to see "No Shirts, No Shoes, No Service" on American stores. But as far as I know, few Americans walk around the streets in what is actually underwear.
I used to see "No Shirts, No Shoes, No Service" on American stores. But as far as I know, few Americans walk around the streets in what is actually underwear.
Mind you, I did this when I was a teenager, I'd be shy to do it now. Appearances didn't really matter where I was from. Mostly Rugby guys, surfing ppl and tradesmen from my small town. Nobody judged you by appearance. I've never seen so much designer ware until I lived in Korea. But, fan death does have a cultural stigma here, and appearances matter. It's really hard to change someone's belief on fan death. So, it's better just to feel amused by the difference in culture.
I'd guess they're talking about something more similar to American cargo shorts or swim trunks.
what about in melbourne. would it be normal to walk into a starbucks with no shirt and no shoes?
No idea, I'm from a small beach town and I haven't been to Melbourne before. From what I know, it has extreme temperatures and moody weather.
Walking in to a supermarket with boardies is fine in my hometown (Port Macquarie).
You should know though, my town is warm all year round. I used to surf in winter without a wetsuit.
Walking in to a supermarket with boardies is fine in my hometown (Port Macquarie).
You should know though, my town is warm all year round. I used to surf in winter without a wetsuit.
in Melbourne even the hippies wear shoes, plus in Melbourne it would be decidedly abnormal to walk into a starbucks at all..
[deleted]
Came here to say the same thing. We've owned numerous fans and none have had that "feature."
Are you certain you are alive?
Do we need to nitpick this article like this? The general statement about how people in South Korea believe in fan death is true.
Yes, we should. If the general statement about fans is not true, then the general statement about how South Koreans believe in fan death loses validity. The author didn't do their research.
That is a very poor line of reasoning. One thing being untrue does not prove/disprove a larger point.
This is unfortunately a very common way of thinking in the US, and completely backwards.
In this case, all you would have to do is speak with someone from South Korea to find out about this, and it turns out, some do believe it - I found out about this phenomena from a friend from Korea, and she believed it to be true even though she knew the science behind it was bunk.
This is unfortunately a very common way of thinking in the US, and completely backwards.
In this case, all you would have to do is speak with someone from South Korea to find out about this, and it turns out, some do believe it - I found out about this phenomena from a friend from Korea, and she believed it to be true even though she knew the science behind it was bunk.
> One thing being untrue does not prove/disprove a larger point.
That's what what he said. What he said was that because the author made a claim that is empirically, provably false, it shows the author didn't reach a level of research that would show them that the claim was false. It brings into question other claims the author has made.
That's what what he said. What he said was that because the author made a claim that is empirically, provably false, it shows the author didn't reach a level of research that would show them that the claim was false. It brings into question other claims the author has made.
[deleted]
I've heard fan death is cited in cases where suicide or overdose is the true cause, and families don't want to admit it to themselves or others.
I had thought the same. And if true the author is mistaken; believing in it (or rather propagating it) does offer something in return.
I've also heard it was propagated by the Korean government so people would save electricity from not running their fans or air conditioners all night in the summer.
The Wikipedia article does have a citation from 1927 [1], though, so it would seem the origins are much older than that.
My guess is it's a bit of all of the above. Maybe there was a little bit of belief in it, and the government, but government efforts to reduce energy usage as well as families using it to cover up suicide or drug overdoses helped propagate the belief and make it far more widespread.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_death#cite_ref-2
The Wikipedia article does have a citation from 1927 [1], though, so it would seem the origins are much older than that.
My guess is it's a bit of all of the above. Maybe there was a little bit of belief in it, and the government, but government efforts to reduce energy usage as well as families using it to cover up suicide or drug overdoses helped propagate the belief and make it far more widespread.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_death#cite_ref-2
> I know fan death isn’t real, it’s ridiculous of course…… but you know it does happen sometimes right?
> cultural mythos is so powerful that it can make people believe things they know to be untrue without even offering them anything in return.
The situation is even worse, unfortunately. This is called fetishistic disavowal: "I know very well, but...". Not only does it take the form of protecting obviously false beliefs (as with fan death), but it can also function as a way of disavowing what we know to be true.
Many of us know the world is facing a set of worsening crises (environmental/social/economic) but continue to live our lives as if this is not the case. I don't mean those who, for example, dispute the truth of global warming, I am speaking of those who know very well it is true but do not do anything.
The philosopher Slavoj Zizek often repeats a story about the astrophysicist Niels Bohr. While a friend was visiting Bohr's country home, they asked why a horseshoe was placed above a doorway, a common good-luck superstition practiced in Europe and elsewhere. Bohr's reply: "of course I don't believe it works, but I was told that it works even if you don't believe in it." Many beliefs in modern times work in this way.
> cultural mythos is so powerful that it can make people believe things they know to be untrue without even offering them anything in return.
The situation is even worse, unfortunately. This is called fetishistic disavowal: "I know very well, but...". Not only does it take the form of protecting obviously false beliefs (as with fan death), but it can also function as a way of disavowing what we know to be true.
Many of us know the world is facing a set of worsening crises (environmental/social/economic) but continue to live our lives as if this is not the case. I don't mean those who, for example, dispute the truth of global warming, I am speaking of those who know very well it is true but do not do anything.
The philosopher Slavoj Zizek often repeats a story about the astrophysicist Niels Bohr. While a friend was visiting Bohr's country home, they asked why a horseshoe was placed above a doorway, a common good-luck superstition practiced in Europe and elsewhere. Bohr's reply: "of course I don't believe it works, but I was told that it works even if you don't believe in it." Many beliefs in modern times work in this way.
http://komplexify.com/math/humor_pure/UrbanLegends.html
> [Paul Adrien Maurice] Dirac had a horse shoe over his desk. One day a student asked if he really believed that a horse shoe brought luck. Professor Dirac replied, "I understand that it brings you luck if you believe in it or not."
further reading: http://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/10/09/horseshoe-luck/
> [Paul Adrien Maurice] Dirac had a horse shoe over his desk. One day a student asked if he really believed that a horse shoe brought luck. Professor Dirac replied, "I understand that it brings you luck if you believe in it or not."
further reading: http://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/10/09/horseshoe-luck/
The claim that something "works whether you believe in it or not" is not necessarily a sign that it is a superstition. After all, things that are objectively true have this property. For example, technologies developed as a result of true scientific discovery work whether or not you believe in them. If something is claimed to work only if you believe it, that is the sign of a superstition.
>I am speaking of those who know very well it is true but do not do anything.
I assume you have some cure that isn't worse than the disease.
I assume you have some cure that isn't worse than the disease.
"fan death" is certainly a possible phenomenon. it works similar to a convection oven. The US EPA even warns against fan death, though not calling it that.
http://askakorean.blogspot.co.uk/2009/01/fan-death-is-real.h...
and
http://www.epa.gov/hiri/about/pdf/EHEguide_final.pdf pg43 and appendix B
this comment totally misses the point of the article. but I was sufficiently amused to learn about "real" fan death that I thought it was worth sharing.
http://askakorean.blogspot.co.uk/2009/01/fan-death-is-real.h...
and
http://www.epa.gov/hiri/about/pdf/EHEguide_final.pdf pg43 and appendix B
this comment totally misses the point of the article. but I was sufficiently amused to learn about "real" fan death that I thought it was worth sharing.
>The TWG also strongly recommends that, as part of a public education program, cities
emphasize that portable electric fans are not the simple cooling solution they appear to
be. Because of the limits of conduction and convection, using a portable electric fan alone
when heat index temperatures exceed 99°f actually increases the heat stress the body must
respond to by blowing air that is warmer than the ideal body temperature over the skin
surface (American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs, 1997; CDC, 2004c). In
these conditions, portable electric fans provide a cooling effect by evaporating sweat. The
increased circulation of hot air and increased sweat evaporation can, however, speed the
onset of heat-attributable conditions (e.g., heat exhaustion).
Appendix B also warns you about the extreme dangers of a fan.
Appendix B also warns you about the extreme dangers of a fan.
So, "fans kill" when the temperature can do that all by itself...
Interesting. So the point is not that the fan can kill you, but that:
1. Being in a completely sealed room when it's very hot outside can kill you,
2. Even though it may make you feel cooler, a fan won't really help in that situation, and
3. It may actually make the problem worse by increasing convection of the air and making it hotter.
I'd argue that calling that "fan death" is misleading, as it's really the heat that's causing the health concerns, not the fan. But it's good to keep in mind these kinds of concerns.
1. Being in a completely sealed room when it's very hot outside can kill you,
2. Even though it may make you feel cooler, a fan won't really help in that situation, and
3. It may actually make the problem worse by increasing convection of the air and making it hotter.
I'd argue that calling that "fan death" is misleading, as it's really the heat that's causing the health concerns, not the fan. But it's good to keep in mind these kinds of concerns.
To be fair, the danger is during "Extreme Heat Emergencies". The effect they are referring to is when the external air is hotter than your internal body temperature (98.6), and so the external air heats up rather than cools down the body.
From the temperature records I can find, temperatures that high are a once in a lifetime event in South Korea. On the other hand, you would experience such temperatures regularly in Arizona, for example, but if you're living in Phoenix and are at risk for heat death, I'd hope you have AC.
From the temperature records I can find, temperatures that high are a once in a lifetime event in South Korea. On the other hand, you would experience such temperatures regularly in Arizona, for example, but if you're living in Phoenix and are at risk for heat death, I'd hope you have AC.
There is a pretty popular expression in Galicia (Spain)that sums up this perfectly:
"Eu non creo nas meigas, mais habelas, hainas"
Which roughly translates to: I don't believe in witches, but they are out there
"Eu non creo nas meigas, mais habelas, hainas"
Which roughly translates to: I don't believe in witches, but they are out there
This is one of my favorite phenomena because it underscores a basic human emotion: being 100% confident that something is not true, yet simultaneously unable to escape the feeling that is can’t be completely untrue.
This sounds a lot like my OCD. I'm an atheist, I don't believe in a "higher power." And yet, I feel compelled to do certain things a certain number of times all because well, "it can't hurt, and just in case." I wish I could explain it better but that article is exactly how I feel about my OCD.
This sounds a lot like my OCD. I'm an atheist, I don't believe in a "higher power." And yet, I feel compelled to do certain things a certain number of times all because well, "it can't hurt, and just in case." I wish I could explain it better but that article is exactly how I feel about my OCD.
Holy sheep shit batman. This story freaks me out. I did not know this was a wide spread thing in Korea.
I had an argument with my wife about this subject years ago. She is from S. Korea and I am from the US. She had yelled at me because I left a fan on and fell asleep. When she got home from work and realized what happened she freaked out and told me I could die that way. At the time I remember thinking that she was absolutely crazy to believe this was possible. We argued for a long time about it and at the time I remember questioning her sanity, repeatedly. Eventually she dropped it and admitted it probably was wrong of her.
Every once in a while this strange superstitious stuff pops up with her. I love her deeply but it is not easy being married to a South Korean. :-)
I had an argument with my wife about this subject years ago. She is from S. Korea and I am from the US. She had yelled at me because I left a fan on and fell asleep. When she got home from work and realized what happened she freaked out and told me I could die that way. At the time I remember thinking that she was absolutely crazy to believe this was possible. We argued for a long time about it and at the time I remember questioning her sanity, repeatedly. Eventually she dropped it and admitted it probably was wrong of her.
Every once in a while this strange superstitious stuff pops up with her. I love her deeply but it is not easy being married to a South Korean. :-)
I feel for you. As a Mormon who has been on missions to Korea, I can without a doubt say they are the most gullible people on the planet. They believe in some crazy stuff.
>I feel for you. As a Mormon who has been on missions to Korea, I can without a doubt say they are the most gullible people on the planet. They believe in some crazy stuff.
"My superstition isn't crazy, but theirs is."
"My superstition isn't crazy, but theirs is."
This questions is probably going to come off as sounding kind of tongue-in-cheek, but I gotta ask: does that make your job easier? Does their 'gullibility' mean that they're more open to new ideas (which would presumably make things easier for you), or just that their current set of beliefs seems crazy to you?
It did make my job easier. But so did the overall politeness in the culture. That's part of being gullible. It's that a large part of it is associated with politeness and willing to hear someone out.
> As a Mormon who has been on missions to Korea, I can without a doubt say they are the most gullible people on the planet.
Wouldn't you need to have not only been to Korea, but also everywhere else (at least, all the populated places) on the planet to justifiably say that "without a doubt"?
Wouldn't you need to have not only been to Korea, but also everywhere else (at least, all the populated places) on the planet to justifiably say that "without a doubt"?
help... choking... irony... too thick...
> As a Mormon
> they are the most gullible people
wat.
> they are the most gullible people
wat.
I this a serious comment? It's legitimately hard to tell.
Superstitions about drafts are bizarrely common. Bosnians, for example, tend to be terrified of "propuh", or cross drafts. If you leave windows open on either side of a building, you risk any malady up to and including paralysis.
I find it hard to understand how such beliefs get started, or manage to remain so prevalent.
I find it hard to understand how such beliefs get started, or manage to remain so prevalent.
In The Netherlands (not sure if that's specified to my country or to people in general) I often hear people saying that you shouldn't go outside without a jacket when it's cold, because it will make you sick...
That one's actually probably correct. http://www.nature.com/news/cold-viruses-thrive-in-frosty-con...
> A team from Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, found that low temperatures dampen natural defences against rhinoviruses, the leading causes of seasonal colds, in mice and in human airway cells.
> A team from Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, found that low temperatures dampen natural defences against rhinoviruses, the leading causes of seasonal colds, in mice and in human airway cells.
Is that the air temperature or body temperature? Your body thermoregulates and won't change temperature based on what you're wearing until you're experiencing hyper/hypothermia
I've heard this in the US, UK, Sweden, Japan... it seems like a universal misconception.
This is common in Canada (from experience) and probably the US (from watching American TV).
It's actually a common misconception for most of the Western world, I think. It's really a misunderstanding between getting cold (hypothermia, in the worst case) and catching a cold, which is a virus.
It probably doesn't help that people spend more time inside in close quarters during cold weather.
Its very easy to understand how it gets started, its just weird that people hang onto them, and it is the same reason people burned witches.
1. Something uneventful thing happens (a guy likes to leave his windows open) 2. He gets cancer and dies 3. Cross drafts are clearly the problem
1. Something uneventful thing happens (a guy likes to leave his windows open) 2. He gets cancer and dies 3. Cross drafts are clearly the problem
People are absurd.
I always thought it was to leave their society a way to honorably explain suicides?
I thought that, too. But how can it be honorable to fall asleep with the fan still running? If that's a deadly thing to do, then it seems like that would be the same as idling your car in a closed garage: still suicide.
I thought that the belief was that running a fan all night was dangerous, not guaranteed to kill. So in that sense, it would be more like getting drunk and being hit by a train - not exactly a smart move, but possibly a better alternative than suicide.
Most younger generation Koreans probably don't believe in it any more. I've seen the myth discussed several times (including at least one newspaper article).
Korea is a very well connected country: some of us do read the English wikipedia.
Also, I kinda like timers in electric fans (though it's been years since I used one): there's no need to blow wind when you're asleep. Sure you wouldn't die, but you might catch cold or find yourself awake at 4 am because your limbs are uncomfortably cold.
(My parents probably still believe in fan death, though.)
Finally, as someone below said, "you can’t even buy a fan that will run all night." is patently false. Every fan I can remember has a "run indefinitely" position.
Korea is a very well connected country: some of us do read the English wikipedia.
Also, I kinda like timers in electric fans (though it's been years since I used one): there's no need to blow wind when you're asleep. Sure you wouldn't die, but you might catch cold or find yourself awake at 4 am because your limbs are uncomfortably cold.
(My parents probably still believe in fan death, though.)
Finally, as someone below said, "you can’t even buy a fan that will run all night." is patently false. Every fan I can remember has a "run indefinitely" position.
> you might catch cold
No more than leaving rags laying around will give you an infestation of mice.
> there's no need to blow wind when you're asleep
Except to keep the room at a comfortable temperature.
No more than leaving rags laying around will give you an infestation of mice.
> there's no need to blow wind when you're asleep
Except to keep the room at a comfortable temperature.
Still weird that they even have a "run indefinitely" position but I totally believe you. I was just reporting what I've heard second hand.
Is the treatment of the topic of Fan Death significantly different on the Korean language Wikipedia?
I just skimmed through it; it contains too many "weasel words", making it sound like something still controversial. :(
I guess a few people still believes the myth and likes to keep the page that way. (Korean wikipedia has much smaller community behind it, so it's easier to exert editorial influence if someone is committed. At least that was my impression several years ago.)
I guess a few people still believes the myth and likes to keep the page that way. (Korean wikipedia has much smaller community behind it, so it's easier to exert editorial influence if someone is committed. At least that was my impression several years ago.)
Does anyone else find it strange that the author uses an article that uncritically repeats the Rolling Stone UVA rape hoax as an example of dispelling myths? Doublethink indeed.
There is obviously no such thing is ghosts. But I challenge you to go into a spooky old house at night with no lights and not be scared of ghosts.
It's odd how being scared of something makes you believe that everyone is scared of it.
There's a significant amount of people who don't actually get scared of "spooky old houses". Just like there's some people who don't get nervous when a giant spider is on their hand. Or when they're talking to a crowd. Or when they're on top of a cliff.
I'd certainly be nervous in a "spooky old house" but certainly not for its ghosts. I do despise spiders for one thing.
There's a significant amount of people who don't actually get scared of "spooky old houses". Just like there's some people who don't get nervous when a giant spider is on their hand. Or when they're talking to a crowd. Or when they're on top of a cliff.
I'd certainly be nervous in a "spooky old house" but certainly not for its ghosts. I do despise spiders for one thing.
you make a good point. And I also certainly would not be afraid of ghosts in an old house. I would be afraid of the unknown and unfamiliar places.
but at the same time, what is interesting to me, is that most of us can get scared by horror films or movies about ghosts. so if you get scared by a ghost in a movie, could that mean you believe, at least for a moment, in ghosts? or would it simply mean that IF ghosts existed, you would be afraid of them.
but at the same time, what is interesting to me, is that most of us can get scared by horror films or movies about ghosts. so if you get scared by a ghost in a movie, could that mean you believe, at least for a moment, in ghosts? or would it simply mean that IF ghosts existed, you would be afraid of them.
I'm no psychologist but if I were to take a stab (pun intended) at a theory about horror movies, it would more likely to be about empathy with the main characters and not wanting them to die, coupled with the suspension of disbelief that comes with watching the movie.
I'd be more scared of tripping over creaky floorboards. When I was a teenager, we briefly lived in a 200 year old house. The floorboards in the upstairs bedrooms bent when you stepped on them. I was convinced they were going to snap in half and we'd fall through the floor, probably cutting an artery in the groin, bleeding out in minutes. I could hardly sleep at night, afraid the bed was going to fall through the floor.
No, the unexplained lights in the hall at night were nothing in comparison.
No, the unexplained lights in the hall at night were nothing in comparison.
> Even believing in ghosts or vampires offers the chance to escape into a reality where anything is possible, even if that reality is terrifying. Fan Death, however, doesn’t offer anything.
Doesn't it have more to do with better safe than sorry human mentality? You barely think about something positive when staring at a completely dark hallway and your brain starts to draw you scary pictures.
Doesn't it have more to do with better safe than sorry human mentality? You barely think about something positive when staring at a completely dark hallway and your brain starts to draw you scary pictures.
I know Korean guy who has a PhD in Biology and believes in fan death. The minds ability to delude itself is amazing.
>However, buying into a myth created by the culture to which you belong apparently doesn’t require extra incentive.
The extra incentive is that you don't die. You don't have to believe the myth to do a cost analysis in your head. Many people who don't believe in god will turn to god in dire situations.
The extra incentive is that you don't die. You don't have to believe the myth to do a cost analysis in your head. Many people who don't believe in god will turn to god in dire situations.
Ask a Korean wrote a few articles on this, the most authoritative on the Internet. (Don't be put off by the URL)
http://askakorean.blogspot.com/2009/01/fan-death-is-real.htm...
It's not as though the URL inaccurately describes his position. After a lot of talk about pseudo-science, that's his position.
I feel like there's a small misunderstanding here: I'm not criticizing Koreans here. I'm sure their understanding of this is more nuanced than I'm describing from second hand accounts. I just think it makes an interesting parallel.
Well if, like you say, all koreans believe that a fan "chops up" air molecules (maybe they all believe the blades of fans chop up CO2 into CO) then they really need to be criticized. I agree with you that its an absolute shock that they believe this. It is definitely one of the crazier beliefs a modernized population can have, and I admit that I believe a staff can be turned into a snake.
Curiosities of human/social behavior such as this amaze me until I think about all the people across multiple cultures who feel compelled to respond in some manner when someone sneezes.
Due to cultural shame of suicide they choose to blame fans as a cause rather than autoerotic asphyxiation.
Has any actual research been done on this? I don't see why people think it's obviously false.
Quoth Wikipedia: "There are no verified cases of the alleged phenomenon"
There's also the fact that this phenomenon has never been observed outside of South Korea. People around the world sleep indoors with fans on every day.
There's also the fact that this phenomenon has never been observed outside of South Korea. People around the world sleep indoors with fans on every day.
> There are no verified cases of the alleged phenomenon
You could say the same thing for SIDS, but most people in the west accept that it exists.
> People around the world sleep indoors with fans on every day.
Then surely some of them must die in their sleep, so it shouldn't be that difficult to do a study.
It's one thing to say that no research has been done to study whether people who sleep under fans are more likely to die in their sleep, or to say that the South Korean belief is unjustified given the lack of evidence, but to say that it's 'obviously false' strikes me as being a little bit racially tinged.
You could say the same thing for SIDS, but most people in the west accept that it exists.
> People around the world sleep indoors with fans on every day.
Then surely some of them must die in their sleep, so it shouldn't be that difficult to do a study.
It's one thing to say that no research has been done to study whether people who sleep under fans are more likely to die in their sleep, or to say that the South Korean belief is unjustified given the lack of evidence, but to say that it's 'obviously false' strikes me as being a little bit racially tinged.
So we ought to do a study on all cultural superstitions just so we don't seem racist? Why don't you conduct the study on fan death, and I'll take care of the study to see whether Bloody Mary is real?
Yes - the classic Morbidity Rates of proto-Altaic ( Haplogroup O2b* (P49), Haplogroup D-M174) Due to Mechanically Generated Localized Atmospheric Disruption And Circulation study is a must read.
For something to not be "obviously false", I expect an intuitive mechanistic just-so story. So, how could fans, operating within standard tolerances, in closed rooms, possibly cause deaths?
There is probably a just-so story that meets this standard, but none has occurred to me.
There is probably a just-so story that meets this standard, but none has occurred to me.
Fan death is not really belief but more healthy respect for the Unknown and avoiding unnecessary risk.
I was thinking similar thoughts about this when reading the article!
Or, part of me thinks that while you know it doesn't make sense, you don't lose anything by being careful about the fan. I think the people in Korea mentioned here are playing Pascal's Wager but with household electronics.
Or, part of me thinks that while you know it doesn't make sense, you don't lose anything by being careful about the fan. I think the people in Korea mentioned here are playing Pascal's Wager but with household electronics.
Fan death is one of the funniest case studies of companies creating hysteria in order to sell more units.
Once everyone has a fan, how do you get people to buy more fans? Make them think their current fans will kill them, and sell more expensive fans with improved ‘safety’ features.
Well played Korea, well played.
Once everyone has a fan, how do you get people to buy more fans? Make them think their current fans will kill them, and sell more expensive fans with improved ‘safety’ features.
Well played Korea, well played.
You got any actual sources to back up this conspiracy theory?
'what else have we been convinced to give up without getting anything in return?'
My time to read this article for one.
I am from South Korea, and I know this fan death thing could seem superstitious, but as another comment pointed out, it is a cautious approach toward unknowns, in addition to mass version of confirmation bias. (News reports a death with a fan on -- oh, that scary scythe of the fan..)
But who knows? There could have been a death that could have been prevented by turning off a fan, and nobody can verify its nonexistence. My attitude toward this is like my agnostic attitude toward God: I just can't know its existence or nonexistence. And I think what the people in the article are expressing can be understood in a similar line (though 100% is an overstatement.)
Still I sometimes argue with Koreans with relatively less background in scientific thinking about scientific things like if fan deaths are possible, or using metal spoons for yogurts kill more microbes than plastic spoons, etc, but many times, my conclusion is that I just can't have any conviction about either ways.
But who knows? There could have been a death that could have been prevented by turning off a fan, and nobody can verify its nonexistence. My attitude toward this is like my agnostic attitude toward God: I just can't know its existence or nonexistence. And I think what the people in the article are expressing can be understood in a similar line (though 100% is an overstatement.)
Still I sometimes argue with Koreans with relatively less background in scientific thinking about scientific things like if fan deaths are possible, or using metal spoons for yogurts kill more microbes than plastic spoons, etc, but many times, my conclusion is that I just can't have any conviction about either ways.
I'm an ex-pat from an Eastern European country, currently living in the UK. Where I come from, there is a subcurrent of racism that pretty much everyone has. I've heard all the standard ones: "[ethnic group]? You know what they're like" and "[religious group] are all [stereotype]. Oh, [a good acquaintance who is the only member of said religious group this person knows]? He's all right, yeah, but he's an exception."[1]
These come in the form of gut feelings that you somehow know are true, and when you're presented with evidence to the contrary you just assume it's an exception to the rule. Even if you objectively know these gut feelings are incorrect, they're still hard to dispel because they're so deeply ingrained. It's stuff that's taken me a while to shake off.
What I'm trying to say is: challenge your gut responses to stuff. It'll make you a better person.
[1]: These are almost verbatim quotes from people who are otherwise fairly open-minded and progressive.