Things You Can Do with Python and POV-Ray(zulko.github.io)

151 pointsby julio_iglesias12 anni fa25 comments

zulko.github.io

Things You Can Do with Python and POV-Ray

http://zulko.github.io/blog/2014/11/13/things-you-can-do-with-python-and-pov-ray/

8 comments

luchak12 anni fa

You might check out Mitsuba (http://www.mitsuba-renderer.org/) and LuxRender (http://www.luxrender.net/). Both are more modern open-source renderers with Python APIs, and I know that Mitsuba is quite popular in the graphics research community (in part because that's where it comes from).

coroxout12 anni fa

I enjoyed this article but I think it's worth pointing out that for simple animations like those shown in example 1 you may not even need Python - POVRay lets you use clock-dependent variables in your scene files and then set off a batch render.

http://wiki.povray.org/content/HowTo:Create_animations http://wiki.povray.org/content/HowTo:Encode_animations_as_Og...

dirkk012 anni fa

It is interesting to hear that the author would prefer Blender over POV-ray in some way, and there are links in the comments to make that work (in terms of running Blender in a headless-like way).

I wonder if there are good resources to create Blender scenes in Python with the full rendering step.

GrantS12 anni fa

I have experience running blender in a completely scripted manner, from geometry creation, to camera motion, to rendering. These links may help:

(1) Blender 2.6, Python Manual with full API and Tutorials

http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:2.6/Manual/Extensions/...

(2) Run python scripts through blender from command line:

blender -b -P script.py

blender -b --python-console (for interactive console)

http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:2.6/Manual/Render/Comm...

GrantS12 anni fa

To follow up with a working example of python via headless blender on the command line, the following 4 lines interactively get me an image of a sphere saved to /tmp/.png

./blender -b --python-console

>>> import bpy

>>> bpy.ops.mesh.primitive_uv_sphere_add(size=3.0,location=(0,0,0))

>>> bpy.ops.render.render(write_still=True)

dirkk012 anni fa

Great, thanks!

Does this work on a Mac and/or Linux?

zulko12 anni fa

I just tested it on Ubuntu, it worked.

My point in the post was more that the embedded Python in Blender isn't really a "binding", it forces you to use Blender's 'internal' Python installation, so you must reinstall all the packages that you need specifically for Blender's Python (I don't know how, but I think there is a way). Also, this makes it impossible to use virtualenv, I guess (not sure).

In short, it would be cool if it just "worked from Python".

GrantS12 anni fa

I ran this on a Mac, should work on Linux as well. Since it may not be obvious, the "blender" command line executable is located within the regular Mac OS X Application bundle for blender that you would download from the web:

/Applications/Blender/blender.app/Contents/MacOS/blender

virtualritz12 anni fa

"It may not be as good as Cinema4D or Pixar’s RenderMan, but POV-Ray is free, open-source, and cross-platform."

Why not use Aqsis or Pixie or, if you like free but don't mind closed source, 3Delight? All are RenderMan compliant.

jdboyd12 anni fa

The Python library cgkit already supports Aqsis, Pixie, and 3Delight, by the way.

Cycles is also free, open source, and cross-platform, and Cycles seems to be both further ahead than either Aqsis or Pixie and moving faster. However, it could use someone to make a Python interface for it.

TD-Linux12 anni fa

Blender's Python interface already has complete bindings to Cycles.

zeeshanm12 anni fa

POV-ray is cool. I remember first using it back in high school when one of my friends introduced me to it. Back in the day, it was a total blessing for me as using a 3D modeling software would COMPLETELY slow down my Intel Celeron powered PC. :-)

Now, this tutorial gives me a good excuse to try out POV-ray once again...

ticviking12 anni fa

You had a celeron, sounds like you were spoiled. :P I had my dads old 486 to play with POV-ray on. I remember getting up at 5 am to work on a scene and come back from school to see if it had rendered right. Do homework tweak and hit render just before bed. If I was lucky I'd finish something cool once a month or so.

morcheeba12 anni fa

I started with POVray on a 486... then I had a big animation to do, so I wrote a primitive filesystem-based job scheduler. I used 13 office computers (P60 or P66) working in parallel to get a 30-second animation done in only a weekend. I think it was about 2 hours rendering/frame.

ucho12 anni fa

Even ignoring python the POV-Ray way is nice if You happen to hate each and every 3D modeler software and prefer to write scene files by hand :)

eudox12 anni fa

While I love the way POV-Ray (And OpenSCAD, for that matter) does things, it bothers me that its language is more about specifying rendering than describing the objects in the scene. That is, the textual commands directly used for rendering, you can't use POV-Ray's language to define a scene and then export it to some 3D file format, to the best of my knowledge, which can then be rendered somewhere else.

geon12 anni fa

Povray relies heavily on operations on primitives like spheres and cylinders, and uses procedural texturing. That can't easily be efficiently converted to triangles and texture maps.

yetihehe12 anni fa

It's hard to port scripting language to "just" data file. Povray's scene description language is so much more versatile (if's, cases, loops, imports...).

bhouston12 anni fa

OT: Having a python interface to Blender would be amazing.

agentultra12 anni fa

As linked by the OP: https://developer.blender.org/T22328

I think that's kind of silly. What if I am a Blender user and want to do some batch-manipulations using an external script?

jcl12 anni fa

Yeah, the bug report response is a little silly.

But the OP's complaint is also a little silly, given that his Vapory library works by writing a temporary scene file, then running the POVRay renderer executable to generate an image file. The same technique can be done with any renderer with a standalone executable, which includes Blender -- you don't need direct access to Blender's internal Python API.

In Blender's case, you might need to write a library to author .blend files, which is non-trivial. But it might also be possible to use Blender's .py script files as an ad-hoc scene description format.

mcphage12 anni fa

Plus, isn't "Blender is for Blender users" kinda redundant? If you're using Blender through an API, you're still a 'Blender user'.

lotsofmangos12 anni fa

It would be pretty easy to make a blender plugin that pipes stuff to blender's internal python console.

rcarmo12 anni fa

Using pyzmq comes to mind. It might even work with IPython.

mkesper12 anni fa

AFAIK every blender detail is accessible via Python so I really don't get it.