DEC 64: Decimal Floating Point by Douglas Crockford(dec64.org)

12 pointsby tosh12 anni fa8 comments

dec64.org

DEC 64: Decimal Floating Point by Douglas Crockford

http://dec64.org/

9 comments

wglb12 anni fa

Posted not that long ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7365812 with substantial commentary and criticism.

tosh12 anni fa

Thanks wglb, seems like the domain changed (even though the .com still works and does not redirect)

lowbloodsugar12 anni fa

>By giving programmers a choice of number types, programmers are required to waste their time making choices that don’t matter. Even worse, making a bad choice can lead to a loss of accuracy or destructive bugs.

So why not use BigDecimal? It's too slow? So performance is a reasonable selection criterion? But not performance of million ints vs a million DEC64s? o_0

[deleted]12 anni fa

shaurz12 anni fa

IEEE 754-2008 already has standardised decimal formats: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_floating_point#IEEE_754...

dragonwriter12 anni fa

Crockford addresses that in passing at the end of the DEC64 page, claiming that IEEE 754's decimal floating point types were too inefficient to garner support.

tosh12 anni fa

Douglas Crockford talks about why he wants DEC 64 in this talk: http://vimeo.com/97419177 (jump to 41m:20s)

nilsimsa12 anni fa

This has been brought up before and lots of issues were raised. Including multiple 0s and lack of normalization.

taylodl12 anni fa

At least with IEEE 754 you can cast as an INT and collate. Putting the exponent in the lowest bits prevents that for DEC64. What were they thinking?