Postmates earned 400% more on a delivery than the delivery guy
8 comments
"Meet the new boss - same as the old boss"
These CRUD-on-a-service companies (Postmates, Uber, etc) aren't "disruption" but just an investment land rush to be the new rent-extracting middlemen. Let's just hope they're easily dislodged when an actual p2p economy finally develops.
These CRUD-on-a-service companies (Postmates, Uber, etc) aren't "disruption" but just an investment land rush to be the new rent-extracting middlemen. Let's just hope they're easily dislodged when an actual p2p economy finally develops.
"Does anyone else have a problem with this?"
I imagine the delivery guy does.
It's a free market though, so if that $21 turns out to be far more than is necessary for making the SAAS site, then a competitor will see it as an opportunity and undercut them eventually. Shouldn't take long if the business model is viable.
I imagine the delivery guy does.
It's a free market though, so if that $21 turns out to be far more than is necessary for making the SAAS site, then a competitor will see it as an opportunity and undercut them eventually. Shouldn't take long if the business model is viable.
ive sinced learned that ebay now would have brought me my chromebook for no additional fee. wun wun also apparently caps the transaction fee at $2.
Typical mistake. Service price is never based on the costs of development but on a value it creates. You might have extremely expensive IT solution that creates no value to anybody and is worth $0. You might have email-based manually operated business that provides service worth thousands USD.
Postmates creates value both for you and the delivery guy. After all - you used their service for some reason and paid for it right? You get the quality service, delivery guy gets the demand for his services.
Alternatively the delivery guy could develop an app for himself only, put it on the appstore and wait for you to download it. But he would never earn anything this way.
Postmates creates value both for you and the delivery guy. After all - you used their service for some reason and paid for it right? You get the quality service, delivery guy gets the demand for his services.
Alternatively the delivery guy could develop an app for himself only, put it on the appstore and wait for you to download it. But he would never earn anything this way.
No why would anyone have a problem with it? If you want to charge less or pay the delivery guy more you have the opportunity to start your own competitor. No one is forcing the delivery guy to work there either, if he is qualified for a better paying job he can find other work.
because a startup has structured its business model to keep the vast majority of the profit it extracts from a virtual work force of independently contracted peons
People tip delivery guys? Aside from food deliveries I've never heard of that before.
how do you know that he only got $5?Maybe part of $19 goes to him as well
i called and asked. they keep 100% of the purchase fee.
Anything is worth what they can convince people to pay for it.
See: the diamond industry.
See: the diamond industry.
actually they don't disclose this fee when you arrange for the original transaction. They list everything as "TBD"
I realize that developing the app that facilitated this transaction is work but for the purposes of a single transaction is it truly 400% as much work?
Does anyone else have a problem with this?
Receipt image: http://goo.gl/z4HBdv