NSA Says It’s Too Large, Complex to Comply With Court Order(aclu.org)
aclu.org
NSA Says It’s Too Large, Complex to Comply With Court Order
https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/too-big-comply-nsa-says-its-too-large-complex-comply-court-order
6 comments
Shut it down. Shut it down shut it down shut it down. I'm past the point of trying to take a nuanced look at balancing the need for security; this is clearly, unquestionably our liberty at stake.
The NSA has a proven track record over several decades that it cannot uphold the Constitution. They are more dangerous to it than the terrorists they fight.
If it can't comply, it's in violation of law and it needs to be shut down completely. The mere fact of its existence and the inability of our elected representatives to hold it accountable to laws indicates that this agency has no right to exist.
Not to mention that the idea that one would have to shut down a database to retrieve data is so ludicrous, the NSA should be ashamed for even trying to propose it or think that anyone will be fooled by it (many will, especially politicians). Land of the free my ass.
Not to mention that the idea that one would have to shut down a database to retrieve data is so ludicrous, the NSA should be ashamed for even trying to propose it or think that anyone will be fooled by it (many will, especially politicians). Land of the free my ass.
They're not saying they have to shut it down to retrieve it, they're saying they have to shut it down to preserve the data it holds. Considering this is the same organization that never was able to figure out what Snowden took from them in the first place, it's plausible.
That said, I agree with lostcolony 1000%.
That said, I agree with lostcolony 1000%.
It's kind of funny, the size of the NSA is the very reason we fear them, thus the very reason we fear them is the very reason we can't shut them down.
Very Catch-22 don't you think? Joseph Heller would have been proud to come up with that line.
I see us as being at a point socially compared to where Stallman was when he wanted to fix a printer and couldn't. He had to build another system from the ground up to circumvent the existing one. That's what I think we have to do. Federated encrypted social media and messaging. It'll take a generation. There's no point in going through the courts, we need something like the GPL and GNU but for privacy.
I see us as being at a point socially compared to where Stallman was when he wanted to fix a printer and couldn't. He had to build another system from the ground up to circumvent the existing one. That's what I think we have to do. Federated encrypted social media and messaging. It'll take a generation. There's no point in going through the courts, we need something like the GPL and GNU but for privacy.
They're basically saying they're too big to regulate?