ISP AT&T Considering Content-Recognizing Anti-Piracy Filter for Entire Network(gizmodo.com)
gizmodo.com
ISP AT&T Considering Content-Recognizing Anti-Piracy Filter for Entire Network
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/net-neuterality/att-considering-scary-content+recognizing-anti+piracy-filter-for-entire-network-320689.php
8 comments
Surely music-sharing software would evolve to encrypt files even before they finished installing it, no?
I'm not sure pirates are that flexible, but I agree circumnavigation is trivial. I think lots of people are pirates mainly out of convenience. If decrypting were harder than unzipping, people might not use it.
I was thinking about movies and realized that one way to stop pirates is to leapfrog a generation of HD quality. If movies were 3600x2400, even with h264 they would take eons to download. Also, they would take a great deal of time to recompress [compression is much more cpu intensive than decompression]. This makes the amateur pirate's life harder. There would be a reason to buy/rent the disk. Avoiding piracy through innovation ... what a thought.
I was thinking about movies and realized that one way to stop pirates is to leapfrog a generation of HD quality. If movies were 3600x2400, even with h264 they would take eons to download. Also, they would take a great deal of time to recompress [compression is much more cpu intensive than decompression]. This makes the amateur pirate's life harder. There would be a reason to buy/rent the disk. Avoiding piracy through innovation ... what a thought.
>I was thinking about movies and realized that one way to stop pirates is to leapfrog a generation of HD quality.
That would definitely do it to a certain extent, but the vast majority of people right now aren't interested in super-HD. HD media is catching on slowly enough because most people don't seem to care about the difference between HD-DVD and DVD.
It couldn't stop piracy, it would just end up differentiating based on whether or not people thought 1.4 gig .avi's are good enough.
That would definitely do it to a certain extent, but the vast majority of people right now aren't interested in super-HD. HD media is catching on slowly enough because most people don't seem to care about the difference between HD-DVD and DVD.
It couldn't stop piracy, it would just end up differentiating based on whether or not people thought 1.4 gig .avi's are good enough.
Most people don't know how to use HD -- certainly a system failure, but also needed info when thinking about what people want. I'm talking about things like cabling and other junk that people have no idea how to properly configure.
If I were the MPAA, I would push partnerships between player makers and TV makers. Make it trivial to play super HD content. They should add their own P2P download rental service to schedule movies -- another convenience factor added on. If a TV just worked with super HD, and if it were internet enabled to get the content I want, piracy would significantly decrease. Piggyback on top of FIOS, and you'd have something great.
If I were the MPAA, I would push partnerships between player makers and TV makers. Make it trivial to play super HD content. They should add their own P2P download rental service to schedule movies -- another convenience factor added on. If a TV just worked with super HD, and if it were internet enabled to get the content I want, piracy would significantly decrease. Piggyback on top of FIOS, and you'd have something great.
Bittorrent is well on its way. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent_protocol_encryption
It boggles my mind that AT&T is even considering this, but I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
It boggles my mind that AT&T is even considering this, but I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
I hope so. Personally, I'd rather it not be necessary.
What a waste of time! What are they going to do about people who use GigaTribe, which encrypts all exchanges, huh? huh?! http://www.gigatribe.com
Oh, that's right... ISPs oversell bandwidth in the hope that most people don't [try to] saturate their connections. Then when they do, the ISPs come up with b.s. excuses like piracy to throttle customer's connections.
I'm not saying piracy isn't a problem, but the ISP's job is to [p]rovide [I]nternet [s]ervice, not decided what I should or shouldn't be able to do on the Internet.