I, Glasshole: My Year With Google Glass(wired.com)
wired.com
I, Glasshole: My Year With Google Glass
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2013/12/glasshole/all/1
19 comments
You describe exactly the use case for which my product Epiphany Eyewear is specialized.
Epiphany records wide-angle HD video (like a GoPro), has a full hour of battery life, and looks & feels like designer eyewear which hold your prescription. Please check it out, I put practically every waking hour of my life into manufacturing this:
http://epiphanyeyewear.com
We are now shipping consumer units, with approximate a 5-week backlog on orders placed right now.
Epiphany records wide-angle HD video (like a GoPro), has a full hour of battery life, and looks & feels like designer eyewear which hold your prescription. Please check it out, I put practically every waking hour of my life into manufacturing this:
http://epiphanyeyewear.com
We are now shipping consumer units, with approximate a 5-week backlog on orders placed right now.
Cool, I will check it out. Congratulations on shipping!
While it seems like most of HN believes Glass's aesthetics to be garish and unwieldy, they are futuristic and I think that's a positive thing. Some day we might do better, but given the technology available today they are actually very compact. Glass has always felt thin and light to me. (Photos can be misleading on this: how many people here have actually held Glass?) I also like that it's explicit: though most people can't tell when it is and isn't recording (and, realistically, people usually assume that it isn't) I like that it's at least upfront that it might be. If someone asked me to stop I'd take it off. So, there's a balance: I wouldn't use it as a "hidden camera" and the aperture on your landing page (if I'm reading the photo right?) looks pretty camouflaged.
While it seems like most of HN believes Glass's aesthetics to be garish and unwieldy, they are futuristic and I think that's a positive thing. Some day we might do better, but given the technology available today they are actually very compact. Glass has always felt thin and light to me. (Photos can be misleading on this: how many people here have actually held Glass?) I also like that it's explicit: though most people can't tell when it is and isn't recording (and, realistically, people usually assume that it isn't) I like that it's at least upfront that it might be. If someone asked me to stop I'd take it off. So, there's a balance: I wouldn't use it as a "hidden camera" and the aperture on your landing page (if I'm reading the photo right?) looks pretty camouflaged.
Thanks!
Epiphany's camera is visible in the production version. The site photo is a little outdated, here are newer pics where you can see the better aperture of the production model:
http://bestoftheweb.quora.com/Epiphany-Eyewear-smart-glasses...
http://instagram.com/p/gEi4OyP-40/
About Glass, while I agree that it's impressively miniaturized for today's technology, I don't think any display component available right now is up to the incredibly high standard of style that is required to be on a person's face. It's an uphill battle, and until some future date when a "holy grail" display component arises that can display images on a regular eyewear lens without any bulk, displays will not be stylish enough for people to feel comfortable wearing them.
Epiphany's camera is visible in the production version. The site photo is a little outdated, here are newer pics where you can see the better aperture of the production model:
http://bestoftheweb.quora.com/Epiphany-Eyewear-smart-glasses...
http://instagram.com/p/gEi4OyP-40/
About Glass, while I agree that it's impressively miniaturized for today's technology, I don't think any display component available right now is up to the incredibly high standard of style that is required to be on a person's face. It's an uphill battle, and until some future date when a "holy grail" display component arises that can display images on a regular eyewear lens without any bulk, displays will not be stylish enough for people to feel comfortable wearing them.
What prompted that design for the frames? While I imagine you were severely restrained in needing to fit equipment in there, they look awfully like the 3d glasses you get at the cinema to me :)
Very impressive product, regardless
Very impressive product, regardless
That photo on the site isn't doing Epiphany justice.
Here is a better pic:
http://bestoftheweb.quora.com/Epiphany-Eyewear-smart-glasses...
This is Epiphany at New York Fashion Week being modeled on the runway by BCBGMAXAZRIA.
And thanks!
Here is a better pic:
http://bestoftheweb.quora.com/Epiphany-Eyewear-smart-glasses...
This is Epiphany at New York Fashion Week being modeled on the runway by BCBGMAXAZRIA.
And thanks!
I'd love to find a way to just be able to checkout a glass for N days.
Say - like for a week or two.
Further - it would be interesting to see glass used in this manner at various locations; say have glass as a navigation/resource location tool in a library, etc...
EDIT: I would love to see a public-service office REQUIRED to wear glass 100% of the time for a period; say a police department - where their every interaction is captured.
To me; this is the most effective immediate social value that these things could provide.
Say - like for a week or two.
Further - it would be interesting to see glass used in this manner at various locations; say have glass as a navigation/resource location tool in a library, etc...
EDIT: I would love to see a public-service office REQUIRED to wear glass 100% of the time for a period; say a police department - where their every interaction is captured.
To me; this is the most effective immediate social value that these things could provide.
Police already have dash-cams, but when something suspicious happens they either don't release the footage or they claim that it malfunctioned. Similarly, the London trains had cameras on them on 7/7/2005 but the authorities stated that all the cameras malfunctioned.
That problem is easily dealt with, though: if recordings should have been available under normal circumstances but weren't provided, create a presumption to find against the authority/officials who should have been on camera unless there is compelling evidence that the lack of recordings was due to a genuine problem.
Officer accused of police brutality and has no recording without a good reason? Go to jail. Suspect accused of resisting arrest and officer has no recording without a good reason? Automatic acquittal.
These kinds of devices can be quite robust, and it's unlikely that only a single recording device would be present at the kind of incident where this sort of issue might arise. The odds of all of them failing at the same time are negligible under most circumstances. And the idea that it's not possible to detect those failures and recall the affected personnel to replace their equipment is similarly implausible under normal conditions.
Officer accused of police brutality and has no recording without a good reason? Go to jail. Suspect accused of resisting arrest and officer has no recording without a good reason? Automatic acquittal.
These kinds of devices can be quite robust, and it's unlikely that only a single recording device would be present at the kind of incident where this sort of issue might arise. The odds of all of them failing at the same time are negligible under most circumstances. And the idea that it's not possible to detect those failures and recall the affected personnel to replace their equipment is similarly implausible under normal conditions.
I suppose here is as good a place as any... but can anyone explain to me why there is an overarching trend of self-describing as an asshole just because you own Glass? It's becoming a connection, especially in the media, that Glass = Asshole and I think it's because much of the early community refers to themselves as "Glassholes".
I own Glass and I am not an asshole (afaik) about it nor do I wish to be perceived as one. I've met a bunch of other Glass users with whom I've brought this up in a similar way to: "Why do you self-deprecatingly call yourself an asshole for wearing Glass?" and as far as I know they stop, but that may just be them not doing it around me.
Do other Glass users feel like they need to call themselves names? Is there something I'm missing/taking out of context? Do people without Glass have an opinion on this?
(An interesting and maybe relevant tidbit is that I was recently told "You make me feel poor" by someone who I was interacting with while wearing Glass)
I own Glass and I am not an asshole (afaik) about it nor do I wish to be perceived as one. I've met a bunch of other Glass users with whom I've brought this up in a similar way to: "Why do you self-deprecatingly call yourself an asshole for wearing Glass?" and as far as I know they stop, but that may just be them not doing it around me.
Do other Glass users feel like they need to call themselves names? Is there something I'm missing/taking out of context? Do people without Glass have an opinion on this?
(An interesting and maybe relevant tidbit is that I was recently told "You make me feel poor" by someone who I was interacting with while wearing Glass)
"It's becoming a connection, especially in the media, that Glass = Asshole and I think it's because much of the early community refers to themselves as "Glassholes"."
I think you've got the causation backwards: people do not perceive Glass users to be assholes because Glass users refer to themselves as such; Glass users refer to themselves as assholes to try to pre-empt the insult.
It's the same visceral social need that drives people to make a joke out of their own awkward behaviors. If you can get people to laugh with you, they aren't laughing at you.
I think you've got the causation backwards: people do not perceive Glass users to be assholes because Glass users refer to themselves as such; Glass users refer to themselves as assholes to try to pre-empt the insult.
It's the same visceral social need that drives people to make a joke out of their own awkward behaviors. If you can get people to laugh with you, they aren't laughing at you.
Penny Arcade was the first step in that behavior; they injected at least a blush of humor into the notion of a "glasshole" early on. They may have even coined the phrase.
There are a lot of people in the world who see every action that others take as some kind of personal statement on the world, instead of just seeing those choices as people doing things for themselves out of natural interest.
You eat meat? You're an asshole, because you must think we should all be carnivores. You studied computer science and got a good job? You're an asshole because your lifestyle is implying liberal arts is worthless, and that I am worthless because I studied liberal arts. You became a wall street trader? You're an asshole because you're telling me money is everything. You wear Google Glass? You're an asshole because you're saying I should wear technology on my face and I don't want to.
It's incredibly naive and self-centered. To think this way, you have to believe the world revolves around you, because you think everyone else's actions are conscious decisions directed at you or people like you. The idea that some people might actually like Glass in a personal sort of way as a cool technology is beyond them. You're making a statement about them - judging them, by wearing glass. So you're an asshole. It's stupid.
You eat meat? You're an asshole, because you must think we should all be carnivores. You studied computer science and got a good job? You're an asshole because your lifestyle is implying liberal arts is worthless, and that I am worthless because I studied liberal arts. You became a wall street trader? You're an asshole because you're telling me money is everything. You wear Google Glass? You're an asshole because you're saying I should wear technology on my face and I don't want to.
It's incredibly naive and self-centered. To think this way, you have to believe the world revolves around you, because you think everyone else's actions are conscious decisions directed at you or people like you. The idea that some people might actually like Glass in a personal sort of way as a cool technology is beyond them. You're making a statement about them - judging them, by wearing glass. So you're an asshole. It's stupid.
I bought glass and wore it for a week. I felt like an asshole while doing so because 1) I was making people uncomfortable and violating social norms (basically keeping a camera pointed at anywhere I looked) for my own convenience, and 2) it signaled I could blow $1700 on a mostly useless device (like having an expensive watch).
I didn't stop using glass because I felt like an asshole though, I stopped because it was just another device to charge with minimal utility.
I didn't stop using glass because I felt like an asshole though, I stopped because it was just another device to charge with minimal utility.
It's almost entirely #1 that makes a Glass wearer an asshole, I can assure you of that.
Going around with a instant recording device is an ultimate manifestation of a lack of common tact. People just do NOT like to be recorded. Period. And the fact that you think it's OK, that's what rubs everyone else the wrong way. Not that you could get that shiny gadget and that they couldn't.
Going around with a instant recording device is an ultimate manifestation of a lack of common tact. People just do NOT like to be recorded. Period. And the fact that you think it's OK, that's what rubs everyone else the wrong way. Not that you could get that shiny gadget and that they couldn't.
Maybe just me, but I kind of feel the 'glasshole' stems from the type of person who wears a bluetooth headset at all times.
I was a bank teller in college right at the height of that technology and nothing irked me more than someone walking up to my window chatting on a bluetooth. I almost preferred they at least have their phone up to their ear if they were going to be rudely belittling me and expecting me to read their minds if I had a question about their transaction. I remember very well countless times someone in the middle of a conversation acting mortified that I would dare interrupt them to clarify something with them. THE HORROR!
Guessing it just has to do with the types of people who have that 'always on' mentality with technology. Put it down and interact with the rest of society
I was a bank teller in college right at the height of that technology and nothing irked me more than someone walking up to my window chatting on a bluetooth. I almost preferred they at least have their phone up to their ear if they were going to be rudely belittling me and expecting me to read their minds if I had a question about their transaction. I remember very well countless times someone in the middle of a conversation acting mortified that I would dare interrupt them to clarify something with them. THE HORROR!
Guessing it just has to do with the types of people who have that 'always on' mentality with technology. Put it down and interact with the rest of society
>> Do people without Glass have an opinion on this?
Yeah, I don't like having cameras pointed at me constantly, I don't like the idea that the person I'm talking to might be recording the whole conversation. And that's if the device itself is trustworthy and not reporting all sorts of stuff straight back to Google and whichever government agencies have decided to take an interest.
Basically it feels like crowd-sourced surveillance. Not positive, hence glasshole.
Yeah, I don't like having cameras pointed at me constantly, I don't like the idea that the person I'm talking to might be recording the whole conversation. And that's if the device itself is trustworthy and not reporting all sorts of stuff straight back to Google and whichever government agencies have decided to take an interest.
Basically it feels like crowd-sourced surveillance. Not positive, hence glasshole.
It's seen as a status symbol, of youngish successful tech people with disposable income. It's conspicuous, so people see it as typical conspicuous consumption, with the feelings that come with that. I think that's it, though I'm not entirely certain.
my reaction when people look at me while wearing google glass is, "please get that camera out of my face." i find it unnerving and sorta creepy to have a camera pointed at my face, and to me, while the glass is not just that, it is still a camera.
A DSLR from many metres away can capture a far higher quality image of you than a Google Glass camera could, even at close range.
If someone is using good DSLR to capture you on your dinner, you're probably a celebrity and used to such things.
The idea that the person across the table have a recording device, and every second of our conversation can be scrutinized later or posted on some social network is very unnerving and mood-killing. I don't dinner with people with smartphone turned on to capture every spoken word for exactly same reason.
The idea that the person across the table have a recording device, and every second of our conversation can be scrutinized later or posted on some social network is very unnerving and mood-killing. I don't dinner with people with smartphone turned on to capture every spoken word for exactly same reason.
With Glass they would have to be staring at you in order to do that. Your criticism doesn't match the product. If someone wants to record you in the way you describe, they will probably use a hidden camera rather than something as obvious as Glass.
So? With a camera they also have to sort of point it at you. Your second point, the problem is: if someone is wearing glass and talking to you, they can record me in the same way. So Glass will force me to be suspicious of everyone wearing it, and this sucks. Imagine if you were talking with someone and they were holding a camera to your face, but, you know, they said "don't worry, I'm not recording", yet they kept pointing it in your direction. It's pretty unconfortable.
You are captured thousands of times a day on CCTV, even if you have done nothing wrong these images can be stored. Data protection means nothing if you never know about it!
This resistance comes 'mostly' from the older generation, look at generation X, your kids. They give information freely, its a natural part of life their life, daily!
When I can walk out of my door and thousands people are feeding information 2 miles away about traffic on route to my work, or predictions of flu outbreaks are spotted before then happen saving hundreds of lives. This is a world where closed minded people don't guard information like there are special. A would where people give information to help others! The world is currently like China, closed minded and guarded. Role on generation X!
This resistance comes 'mostly' from the older generation, look at generation X, your kids. They give information freely, its a natural part of life their life, daily!
When I can walk out of my door and thousands people are feeding information 2 miles away about traffic on route to my work, or predictions of flu outbreaks are spotted before then happen saving hundreds of lives. This is a world where closed minded people don't guard information like there are special. A would where people give information to help others! The world is currently like China, closed minded and guarded. Role on generation X!
Yes, you are missing the hostility that wearing Glass engenders in other people.
I've heard from a couple of different sources that the word "Glasshole" was invented on the Google campus, to refer to the early prototype wearers who were strutting around on campus...
As someone without Glass and currently unused to see it, my feeling is not "You make me feel poor". If it was the case, I imagine I will just be jealous, it will be a good point for the Glass (as if you have an expensive car or a gold watch).
My first impression is more something like "I can not see your eyes" (as if you were wearing sun glass) mixed with a "You are not focus when I speak to you" (as if you were looking your phone during a meal). But my opinion may be not relevant since I will not insult you for wearing Glass.
My first impression is more something like "I can not see your eyes" (as if you were wearing sun glass) mixed with a "You are not focus when I speak to you" (as if you were looking your phone during a meal). But my opinion may be not relevant since I will not insult you for wearing Glass.
Personally, I don't think wearing Google Glass makes you an asshole. I think it makes you look ridiculous (when I first saw someone wearing them I burst out laughing, I couldn't help myself).
Why this is, I don't know, but when nerds get famous (not rich; famous) they suddenly begin thinking they have a fashion sense ;)
The reaction to the early adopters of cell phones were similar. They were perceived as yuppies who though themselves as way to important to talk to the people they were actually with at the moment.
[deleted](1)
Robert Scoble is references in the article. I actually believe this picture helps counteract the "asshole" meme. He really does not come through as a person who takes himself too seriously here.
It does nothing to counteract the the dweeb meme though.
It does nothing to counteract the the dweeb meme though.
I was showing my Glass to a family member who visited from out of state. He's a commercial helicopter pilot, isn't wired in to the tech space, and didn't know much of anything about it.
He went completely mental after putting it on.
A few interesting things he noted:
1. Many commercial helicopter pilots today use iPads with a software called Foreflight (http://foreflight.com/). They mount the iPad in the cabin and prefer it to the older analog stuff.
2. The form factor alone is a huge improvement over anything else available on the market, he told me. He also said that many pilots would pay top dollar for a device like Glass. "All" it would need to do is: a) display a hud w/ waypoints, b) show current conditions, c) know which direction he's looking at.
4. Pilots see the world differently. We look at Google Maps, they look at SkyVector[2]. Flying commercially is mostly an automated affair with everything planned out ahead of time. Computers do all the work. The location/size/properties of every airport is stored in a consistent format. Pretty much everything is standardized and easily accessible, no matter how remote the location! [3]
5. He told me that the day-to-day processes are ancient. Logbooks are kept by hand, for example. This is interesting considering aviation is a highly regulated industry. All process are laid out in great detail and slow to change. This could make building software in this space easier once you get past the initial hump.
6. Military pilots have had things like this for years, but way more advanced. He told me about helmet-mounted displays (woah) [1].
We went on to discuss the myriad of practical applications for a device like Glass, even if the cost stays high past the prototyping phase. Unfortunately none of them included every-day usage by his wife and kids.
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmet-mounted_display
[2]: http://skyvector.com/
[3]: http://skyvector.com/airport/ZMCD/Dornod-Choibalsan-Internat...
He went completely mental after putting it on.
A few interesting things he noted:
1. Many commercial helicopter pilots today use iPads with a software called Foreflight (http://foreflight.com/). They mount the iPad in the cabin and prefer it to the older analog stuff.
2. The form factor alone is a huge improvement over anything else available on the market, he told me. He also said that many pilots would pay top dollar for a device like Glass. "All" it would need to do is: a) display a hud w/ waypoints, b) show current conditions, c) know which direction he's looking at.
4. Pilots see the world differently. We look at Google Maps, they look at SkyVector[2]. Flying commercially is mostly an automated affair with everything planned out ahead of time. Computers do all the work. The location/size/properties of every airport is stored in a consistent format. Pretty much everything is standardized and easily accessible, no matter how remote the location! [3]
5. He told me that the day-to-day processes are ancient. Logbooks are kept by hand, for example. This is interesting considering aviation is a highly regulated industry. All process are laid out in great detail and slow to change. This could make building software in this space easier once you get past the initial hump.
6. Military pilots have had things like this for years, but way more advanced. He told me about helmet-mounted displays (woah) [1].
We went on to discuss the myriad of practical applications for a device like Glass, even if the cost stays high past the prototyping phase. Unfortunately none of them included every-day usage by his wife and kids.
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmet-mounted_display
[2]: http://skyvector.com/
[3]: http://skyvector.com/airport/ZMCD/Dornod-Choibalsan-Internat...
> He told me that the day-to-day processes are ancient.
It's a basic tenet of air safety that everything can be done by hand when equipment fails.
For example, it's a requirement that you should be able to do vector calculations to account for wind: using only pen-and-paper tools.
Although licensed pilots are allowed to use technology to assist, you shouldn't imagine that the ancient day-to-day processes will change.
It's a basic tenet of air safety that everything can be done by hand when equipment fails.
For example, it's a requirement that you should be able to do vector calculations to account for wind: using only pen-and-paper tools.
Although licensed pilots are allowed to use technology to assist, you shouldn't imagine that the ancient day-to-day processes will change.
Similarly, a cycling app would also be great; also, a heads-up display for ordinary car navigation.
Perhaps the best way to market it is as purpose-specific equipment: you ride a bike, you wear a helmet. It's not weird to wear special cycling glasses, but cool. It's not necessary to hit the universal mass-market first off (and not how new technology is usually adopted anyway).
Perhaps the best way to market it is as purpose-specific equipment: you ride a bike, you wear a helmet. It's not weird to wear special cycling glasses, but cool. It's not necessary to hit the universal mass-market first off (and not how new technology is usually adopted anyway).
Don't agree with most of the article but hey it's cool that I'm in the top picture (second row). Here are a few brief comments
Socially Awkward: I've worn Glass every day since I got it (one of the first ones) and had 2 negative reactions and one of them ended up being a VC that after explaining it to him offered to fund me (I didn't accept). You have to be sympathetic to other people's feelings, if someone is feeling uncomfortable and you aren't using it then just put it on your head/neck and watch them chill out instantly. It's awkward when someone's constantly wondering if you are recording them but too scared to ask, just diffuse the situation and figure out what is making them feel uncomfortable. Once they understand how it works it will clear up any wild ideas they may have. Part of being an early adopter of anything is to explain it to people who are curious (same goes for fitbits, AR drones, etc).
Glass wearers self-segregating: If you act nervous and self aware while you are wearing it, you will make the whole room feel uncomfortable. If you are approachable and having fun with others you'll get a whole night club to stop dancing and want to talk to you (this is in DC, not exactly a bastion of techies like SF/NY). Due to how the Glass invites were distributed it's not "self-segregated" it's "self-selected", you invite your friends which means when you go out you are with your friends. Causation vs correlation man, the former is sensational and the latter isn't even mentioned.
At the end it starts to get more agreeable: glass is v1, it's incredibly ambitious of them to have released Glass like they did and it's allowing us to even have these discussions (thanks!), and the status quo (phones) aren't that great either right now. Sure it's not perfect but look where we came from: custom/clunky wearables of the 90's, nothing special for a decade, and now we have something that gets more positive attention than I'd otherwise get. Instead of looking at the first datapoint on a timeline and dumping on it, shouldn't a hip futurist publication (where the author says he gets made fun of...that's probably more telling about what it's like to work at Wired than anything) try to think out a few more steps and not sling link bait like this?
(from my G+ post https://plus.google.com/+BrandynWhite/posts/fRfhgBXej7e)
Socially Awkward: I've worn Glass every day since I got it (one of the first ones) and had 2 negative reactions and one of them ended up being a VC that after explaining it to him offered to fund me (I didn't accept). You have to be sympathetic to other people's feelings, if someone is feeling uncomfortable and you aren't using it then just put it on your head/neck and watch them chill out instantly. It's awkward when someone's constantly wondering if you are recording them but too scared to ask, just diffuse the situation and figure out what is making them feel uncomfortable. Once they understand how it works it will clear up any wild ideas they may have. Part of being an early adopter of anything is to explain it to people who are curious (same goes for fitbits, AR drones, etc).
Glass wearers self-segregating: If you act nervous and self aware while you are wearing it, you will make the whole room feel uncomfortable. If you are approachable and having fun with others you'll get a whole night club to stop dancing and want to talk to you (this is in DC, not exactly a bastion of techies like SF/NY). Due to how the Glass invites were distributed it's not "self-segregated" it's "self-selected", you invite your friends which means when you go out you are with your friends. Causation vs correlation man, the former is sensational and the latter isn't even mentioned.
At the end it starts to get more agreeable: glass is v1, it's incredibly ambitious of them to have released Glass like they did and it's allowing us to even have these discussions (thanks!), and the status quo (phones) aren't that great either right now. Sure it's not perfect but look where we came from: custom/clunky wearables of the 90's, nothing special for a decade, and now we have something that gets more positive attention than I'd otherwise get. Instead of looking at the first datapoint on a timeline and dumping on it, shouldn't a hip futurist publication (where the author says he gets made fun of...that's probably more telling about what it's like to work at Wired than anything) try to think out a few more steps and not sling link bait like this?
(from my G+ post https://plus.google.com/+BrandynWhite/posts/fRfhgBXej7e)
A VC offered to fund you as a technology user?
Well I do a bit more than that http://openshades.com and http://wearscript.com
"I have no idea why my wife was resistant to live-casting the birthing experience."
Seriously? Is this a joke? He really is a Glasshole :P
Seriously? Is this a joke? He really is a Glasshole :P
I don't seriously think anyone at Google thinks Glass is going anywhere. To me, this looks like Google just trying to cement in the public's head that Google=Futuristic technology. In that regard, and pretty much only that regard, Glass has been a success.
I think wearable computing is definitely the future, and Glass is probably a good first stab at it. I don't think anyone thinks glass is the perfect solution, though.
Wearable computing has been around for decades. Even commercial companies. The tech has been and still is too weak to break out of niche markets. But tech progresses.
I hope I'm dead before this happens.
Okay, but if you want to convince others to share your view, you need to state your objection to it. It's more credible if you back up your objection with realistic examples of what you are concerned about. It's also more convincing if your concerns are consistent with the technology. For example, many people state that they object to the camera on Glass. Yet, DSLR cameras are far more effective at taking high quality pictures from a distance.
This is old and tired news. These attitudes will change. I know cause I'm old enough to have seen it before with advent of cellular phones. Same reactions, calling people assholes, same stigma, same wealth issues.
People hated the jerks who were rich enough and self important enough to be phoneable anywhere, anytime. Eventually price, ugly factor came down and phones became ok cause everyone had one.
Same thing will happen.
People hated the jerks who were rich enough and self important enough to be phoneable anywhere, anytime. Eventually price, ugly factor came down and phones became ok cause everyone had one.
Same thing will happen.
I don't think the real problems with Google Glass have much to do with showing off how rich the wearer is. Most of the strong concerns I've heard -- and I thought I was pretty down on the idea, until I heard some otherwise very level-headed people I know speak about it -- relate to the privacy aspect. I don't see that going anywhere, just as today most of us have mobile phones but there are plenty of places that will ask you to turn them off so you're not disturbing everyone else around you with your conversations/ring tones/etc.
But is the lack of understanding due to the current inequity? I suspect people fear it partly because it is an unknown device that they haven't been able to experience yet. Once they have tried it, some will probably relax a little bit.
Cameras on phones had similar reactions to begin with. Now everyone just finds them to be extremely useful.
Cameras on phones had similar reactions to begin with. Now everyone just finds them to be extremely useful.
That's a false comparison.
Cellular phones do not constitute an invasive act perpetrated on others. Unless you start having loud conversation in the presence of others, in which case you're still an asshole.
Cellular phones do not constitute an invasive act perpetrated on others. Unless you start having loud conversation in the presence of others, in which case you're still an asshole.
I wear Prescription Glasses. I can't wait to get Google Glass that work well with Prescription Glasses. To me it is seamless since I already wear glasses anyway.
Google by ignoring Prescription Glass users initially lost a chance to have people use it 24x7.
Google by ignoring Prescription Glass users initially lost a chance to have people use it 24x7.
I also wear prescription glasses, but wearing Google Glass 24x7 sounds like a terrible idea to me.
Think of it like this: There are all sorts of situations in which it is socially unacceptable to have your phone out. Movies. Funerals. Intimate conversations with loved ones.
Having Glass on 24x7 is basically the same as always having your phone out. Sure, maybe it's off and you're not actually looking at the screen while you're having a conversation. But the other person doesn't know that. If you flick your eye to a corner, does that mean you got something in your eye or were you checking a text message? Wearing prescription glasses does not interfere with my ability to establish eye contact and maintain a personal connection with someone. Google Glass does.
And, come to think of it, that's really the problem with Glass. There are all sorts of useful situations in which I'd like to have Glass, much as there are all sorts of useful situations in which I'd like to have a smartphone. But I can easily put away the smartphone in the situations where it's socially unacceptable to have it out. It doesn't seem nearly as convenient to do so with Glass.
Think of it like this: There are all sorts of situations in which it is socially unacceptable to have your phone out. Movies. Funerals. Intimate conversations with loved ones.
Having Glass on 24x7 is basically the same as always having your phone out. Sure, maybe it's off and you're not actually looking at the screen while you're having a conversation. But the other person doesn't know that. If you flick your eye to a corner, does that mean you got something in your eye or were you checking a text message? Wearing prescription glasses does not interfere with my ability to establish eye contact and maintain a personal connection with someone. Google Glass does.
And, come to think of it, that's really the problem with Glass. There are all sorts of useful situations in which I'd like to have Glass, much as there are all sorts of useful situations in which I'd like to have a smartphone. But I can easily put away the smartphone in the situations where it's socially unacceptable to have it out. It doesn't seem nearly as convenient to do so with Glass.
It's pretty easy to do the equivalent, I just flip it to the top of my head like I do with sunglasses when I go indoors.
Umm, not if you would be blind as a bat without your prescription glasses! Like many glasses wearers I do have contact lenses too, but glasses are much more comfortable to wear all day.
A prescription version might allow you to flip just the screen, like some clip-on sunglasses.
Yes! I already wear glasses that are very expensive, surely I'd be able to use GG without looking too extravagant.
Not to mention people who have and can deal with social stigma.
I, like others here, have Glass. My girlfriend dumped me and I lost all my friends but hey now I can wink to take a picture so it's all good.
The author says it is the format what makes you an asshole. It is not.
If I go with my reflex pointing to people in the beach people will get angry at me. As simple as people is there to relax, not to have to defend themselves.
People is doing top less in the beach and people could see it at the moment. It is a completely different thing that someone will store the date, the place, the people in the pictures and have millions of people look at them on the Internet.
I got to watch a woman, a sports teacher fired from a Catholic school because she made top less 8 years ago!! and one of his students got a picture from an ex- boyfriend asshole and soon all the school had the pictures. Half of the parents supported her, over a quarter were outraged.
People say stupid things all the time, when there is friends, I don't want my conversations recorded without my permission and having someone remind me constantly : you say this and that while drinking beer with the football team.
The same way Paul Graham was sold by a private conversation made into an interview by a son of a b*ch. When you are talking to someone else you are not talking to millions of people.
If I go with my reflex pointing to people in the beach people will get angry at me. As simple as people is there to relax, not to have to defend themselves.
People is doing top less in the beach and people could see it at the moment. It is a completely different thing that someone will store the date, the place, the people in the pictures and have millions of people look at them on the Internet.
I got to watch a woman, a sports teacher fired from a Catholic school because she made top less 8 years ago!! and one of his students got a picture from an ex- boyfriend asshole and soon all the school had the pictures. Half of the parents supported her, over a quarter were outraged.
People say stupid things all the time, when there is friends, I don't want my conversations recorded without my permission and having someone remind me constantly : you say this and that while drinking beer with the football team.
The same way Paul Graham was sold by a private conversation made into an interview by a son of a b*ch. When you are talking to someone else you are not talking to millions of people.
Here's why Glass users are assholes, and why that won't always be true: because "iPod" is a verb.
"To iPod" is to change a particular technology so much that you create a permanent mark in everyone's calendar. Before Apple invented the first iPod, music players were clunky and irritating, and it was like nobody in the business knew the first thing about user interface design. After the iPod, music players were iPods, clones of iPods, or nothing. And carrying music around with you is so ubiquitous that the commuters on the bus who don't have earbuds in their ears look weird.
Glass hasn't been iPodded yet. That means it's intrusive, ugly, and it threatens people -- a bit like the way people felt uncomfortable sitting on the bus with someone who had headphones on. It's rude, it's anti-social, and it's a clear sign that someone is maladjusted.
But one day, someone -- almost certainly not Google -- will create a wearable camera/HUD/computer that is to Google Glass what the iPod is to the Sony Walkman. And after that, it will be normal for people to be documenting their whole lives, and the hostility will disappear quite quickly.
But that day is not today. Today, if you use Glass in public, you are an asshole. Accept it peacefully and look forward to the iPodding.
"To iPod" is to change a particular technology so much that you create a permanent mark in everyone's calendar. Before Apple invented the first iPod, music players were clunky and irritating, and it was like nobody in the business knew the first thing about user interface design. After the iPod, music players were iPods, clones of iPods, or nothing. And carrying music around with you is so ubiquitous that the commuters on the bus who don't have earbuds in their ears look weird.
Glass hasn't been iPodded yet. That means it's intrusive, ugly, and it threatens people -- a bit like the way people felt uncomfortable sitting on the bus with someone who had headphones on. It's rude, it's anti-social, and it's a clear sign that someone is maladjusted.
But one day, someone -- almost certainly not Google -- will create a wearable camera/HUD/computer that is to Google Glass what the iPod is to the Sony Walkman. And after that, it will be normal for people to be documenting their whole lives, and the hostility will disappear quite quickly.
But that day is not today. Today, if you use Glass in public, you are an asshole. Accept it peacefully and look forward to the iPodding.
Glass is amazing, but it's not for everyday wear, like a watch, because you look like a tool. That said, there are a few very niche applications for it that I can't wait to try: deep sea fishing, for one. Our boat is fairly customized and teched out. Walking around on the boat and having the data overlayed infront of you would be awesome. Maybe hooking up the coms is also possible, I'd like to stream the video feed of the cameras in the lures too.
I don't know why it has to be so negative. All the negativity seems to be privacy concern. I respect that and I do understand there is privacy concern.
But the technology is pretty fun for people who just want to capture every fun moment of their life. I, for one, would love to wear it every day. I always see interesting stuff. But holding a physical phone on my hand seems weird to me. I feel like if I could just film the current event as I am looking would be awesome and easy. I don't have to pull out my device and stand there. Putting it on my head seems natural to me. Imagine instead there is Google Watch with the same functionality, it'd surely would be awkward. When I am searching for a place, I imagine that Glass could just scan my environment as I look and tell me "oops there is the coffee shop you are looking for!" To me, the most awkward thing about taking photos with cell phone by myself or with a group of people (call it selfie) is holding a cell phone. Every time when someone pull out a cell phone taking some instagram photos on the food or people, everyone around will look at him.
I broke up with this lovely girl. I wish I had this shiny toy when I was with her. It would be really fun to take lots of pictures and video. Kids like me love blogging too. I always entertain myself thinking "it would be nice if I had the gut and time to do vblog."
But the technology is pretty fun for people who just want to capture every fun moment of their life. I, for one, would love to wear it every day. I always see interesting stuff. But holding a physical phone on my hand seems weird to me. I feel like if I could just film the current event as I am looking would be awesome and easy. I don't have to pull out my device and stand there. Putting it on my head seems natural to me. Imagine instead there is Google Watch with the same functionality, it'd surely would be awkward. When I am searching for a place, I imagine that Glass could just scan my environment as I look and tell me "oops there is the coffee shop you are looking for!" To me, the most awkward thing about taking photos with cell phone by myself or with a group of people (call it selfie) is holding a cell phone. Every time when someone pull out a cell phone taking some instagram photos on the food or people, everyone around will look at him.
I broke up with this lovely girl. I wish I had this shiny toy when I was with her. It would be really fun to take lots of pictures and video. Kids like me love blogging too. I always entertain myself thinking "it would be nice if I had the gut and time to do vblog."
> But the technology is pretty fun for people who just want to capture every fun moment of their life.
Except for all other people in the frame who don't want to be captured in the process.
Fun for one at the expense of others is the book definition of an asshole.
So, yeah, you do not understand the privacy concerns nor do you respect them. You will fit right in with the rest of the Glass crowd.
Except for all other people in the frame who don't want to be captured in the process.
Fun for one at the expense of others is the book definition of an asshole.
So, yeah, you do not understand the privacy concerns nor do you respect them. You will fit right in with the rest of the Glass crowd.
> Fun for one at the expense of others is the book definition of an asshole.
No. Find the book that describe this.
> So, yeah, you do not understand the privacy concerns nor do you respect them. You will fit right in with the rest of the Glass crowd.
So the difference between Glass and a cell phone is that holding a cell phone is more apparent and obvious to people so they can avoid being in my recording? Instead of an invisible Glass, the Glass is visible. I hold my phone in my hand a lot. I usually talk while holding my phone and my hands move a lot. How do you know I am not recording you? How do you know I am not an undercover journalist with a hidden camera in my bag walking around BestBuy? If you actually think that's the safe zone to address privacy concern, that is my book definition of trying to feel better when the truth is not.
Look at tourists with DSLR in front of their chest or holding it in their hand. How can you tell they are not creeping on you either? I own a DSLR so I know how little people pay attention to it. I can just walk around like that all day.
When I say respecting your concern meaning I am going to be your best friend to the best of my ability like remove my headset at your request when we share a tight space. You can't guarantee a guy with a cell phone not doing something illegal and horrible to you. So, how can you hold me accountable for something I probably won't commit? And now I am asked DON'T EVER PUT IT ON?
The public space is utilized by all kinds of people and for all kinds of purposes. If you feel uncomfortable with me wearing a GLASS in front of you, tell me to remove it and I probably will (e.g I am taking a picture of my family from the GLASS I probably will wait until you go away or find some place else.)
And paying my respect does not mean I have to agree with you. As long as it is legal and as long as I am not really hurting you (because I am just a random guy you probably won't see me again), I can't be stopped for your concern. You can your right to file a complain. Whereas if your neighbor is playing loud music you probably have a good chance of winning the lawsuit.
So, let's tolerate each other.
No. Find the book that describe this.
> So, yeah, you do not understand the privacy concerns nor do you respect them. You will fit right in with the rest of the Glass crowd.
So the difference between Glass and a cell phone is that holding a cell phone is more apparent and obvious to people so they can avoid being in my recording? Instead of an invisible Glass, the Glass is visible. I hold my phone in my hand a lot. I usually talk while holding my phone and my hands move a lot. How do you know I am not recording you? How do you know I am not an undercover journalist with a hidden camera in my bag walking around BestBuy? If you actually think that's the safe zone to address privacy concern, that is my book definition of trying to feel better when the truth is not.
Look at tourists with DSLR in front of their chest or holding it in their hand. How can you tell they are not creeping on you either? I own a DSLR so I know how little people pay attention to it. I can just walk around like that all day.
When I say respecting your concern meaning I am going to be your best friend to the best of my ability like remove my headset at your request when we share a tight space. You can't guarantee a guy with a cell phone not doing something illegal and horrible to you. So, how can you hold me accountable for something I probably won't commit? And now I am asked DON'T EVER PUT IT ON?
The public space is utilized by all kinds of people and for all kinds of purposes. If you feel uncomfortable with me wearing a GLASS in front of you, tell me to remove it and I probably will (e.g I am taking a picture of my family from the GLASS I probably will wait until you go away or find some place else.)
And paying my respect does not mean I have to agree with you. As long as it is legal and as long as I am not really hurting you (because I am just a random guy you probably won't see me again), I can't be stopped for your concern. You can your right to file a complain. Whereas if your neighbor is playing loud music you probably have a good chance of winning the lawsuit.
So, let's tolerate each other.
> So, let's tolerate each other.
Yes, yes, many words, lots of rationality. The problem is that the cause is irrational. I do NOT like the fact that you are wearing an always-on recording device pointed in my direction. That's it. I don't like it. Just as I don't like people farting, burping and chewing with their mouths open.
Moreover, and that's the root of this whole "asshole" angle of the Glass use, I am hardly alone. In the unlikely event that you weren't aware of this before, now you are. Just read through the rest of comments here. Now you know that a lot of people feel the exact same way. And yet you insist on wearing it. You choose to act in spite. Do tell me how it makes you look to others and what they will in fact be tempted to call you. And then let's talk about tolerance and understanding.
Yes, yes, many words, lots of rationality. The problem is that the cause is irrational. I do NOT like the fact that you are wearing an always-on recording device pointed in my direction. That's it. I don't like it. Just as I don't like people farting, burping and chewing with their mouths open.
Moreover, and that's the root of this whole "asshole" angle of the Glass use, I am hardly alone. In the unlikely event that you weren't aware of this before, now you are. Just read through the rest of comments here. Now you know that a lot of people feel the exact same way. And yet you insist on wearing it. You choose to act in spite. Do tell me how it makes you look to others and what they will in fact be tempted to call you. And then let's talk about tolerance and understanding.
> I do NOT like the fact that you are wearing an always-on recording device pointed in my direction.
Well, I will wear it if I was given one and just because you don't like it me wearing it all the time does not mean I have to drop it. That's something I can choose to do without being called an asshole. The same thing goes to people who are pro gun and who are not. It doesn't matter whether it is given by the Constitution or not. If saying owning a gun is morally bad, then one is disrespecting someone's preference to like owning a gun. Disclaimer: I am anti-gun.
I can temporarily remove it at your presence, but I am not going stop wearing it if I had one. That's my right to be a user. Being respectful doesn't mean you have to agree with me. You don't have to accept that God exist and that I am praying to Lord on the train when I am sitting next to you. And this has nothing to do with freedom of religion. It is a matter of preference that I chose to pray when I am riding the E train.
Well, I will wear it if I was given one and just because you don't like it me wearing it all the time does not mean I have to drop it. That's something I can choose to do without being called an asshole. The same thing goes to people who are pro gun and who are not. It doesn't matter whether it is given by the Constitution or not. If saying owning a gun is morally bad, then one is disrespecting someone's preference to like owning a gun. Disclaimer: I am anti-gun.
I can temporarily remove it at your presence, but I am not going stop wearing it if I had one. That's my right to be a user. Being respectful doesn't mean you have to agree with me. You don't have to accept that God exist and that I am praying to Lord on the train when I am sitting next to you. And this has nothing to do with freedom of religion. It is a matter of preference that I chose to pray when I am riding the E train.
You basically ignored all I've said and went meta.
I'm not a lawyer but I heard if you say "You don't have permission to record me." they're legally obligated to delete the video.
In the United States, there is no expectation of privacy while in public. They are not legally obligated to do anything.
This doesn't make it any less of an asshole behavior, though. Also, it should not be the onus of each target of your gaze to constantly be saying "stop it". That's called "opt-out" and is pretty globally regarded as completely obnoxious.
This doesn't make it any less of an asshole behavior, though. Also, it should not be the onus of each target of your gaze to constantly be saying "stop it". That's called "opt-out" and is pretty globally regarded as completely obnoxious.
Perhaps that's why you're not a lawyer :)
Hah OK. I'm only repeating what I learned in a video class, but that was 10+ years ago so maybe the laws have changed since then? But even then, how many people (in public) would go out of their way to engage the person with the camera when that more likely makes a bad situation worse?
>> I broke up with this lovely girl. I wish I had this shiny toy when I was with her. It would be really fun to take lots of pictures and video.
And how would she have felt about her creepy ex having kept a whole load of pictures of her?
That's really quite weird.
--edit-- seriously, read that last sentence of yours back. That sounds deeply creepy.
And how would she have felt about her creepy ex having kept a whole load of pictures of her?
That's really quite weird.
--edit-- seriously, read that last sentence of yours back. That sounds deeply creepy.
Oh, so anyone in relationship should just delete everything? Is that something you are going to propose? She's still my friend and we cherish everything we had. Please. Don't think so creepy about other people.
It sounded like you wished you had a bunch of naked pictures of her. So yeah, creepy.
I'm still friends with various ex girlfriends too but I don't go around saying "I wish I had more photos of my ex from back when we were together" because it sounds like a mixture of creepy and unable to let go.
I'm still friends with various ex girlfriends too but I don't go around saying "I wish I had more photos of my ex from back when we were together" because it sounds like a mixture of creepy and unable to let go.
It's interesting that there are so many comments about how uncomfortable people get around it due to not knowing if they are being filmed/recorded... why didn't Google simply cater for that by adding a small, hardware-controlled red "recording" LED indicator to it? I think it would work wonders to the rejection around Glass.
I think people do not mind the device itself. For example bluetooth handsfree is kind of similar, it can do even do recording, but most people do not mind it.
I think problem is usability. It is not possible to have conversation and use this device at the same time.
I think problem is usability. It is not possible to have conversation and use this device at the same time.
So here's a question, If google made google glass look just like a prescription glass, would it be for the better or worse?
Just wait for Apple to release "iGlass".
OMG, how innovative, Apple and see everyone is copying Apple.
OMG, how innovative, Apple and see everyone is copying Apple.
I've changed my mind about this a little bit recently: now I use it as a classier GoPro. There are a lot of times where it isn't appropriate to have a GoPro strapped to your head, but there's still good story potential. In most of those cases, the cool factor of Glass lets you get away with recording it.
My friends and I stitch the footage we collect from the adventures in our lives into a video every now and then, and Glass has added a lot to the storytelling capability.
Maybe wanting to record stuff makes me a narcissistic millennial, but it doesn't harm anyone and the videos we get out of it are awesome. I don't know if that use-case justifies Glass, but it definitely has some value for me, even if it's only used rarely.