Android on x86(code.google.com)

So you won't be as frustrated when you get disconnected at 99% ? (I am not sure if you can resume downloading, like with FTP servers that support resuming)

w1ntermute17 anni fa

Not to mention the client has to support resuming as well. This is why (along with the fact that they enjoy using ridiculously outdated technology) the scene still uses split RARs—a lot of the autotrading scripts (as well as FTPd's) they utilize don't support resuming.

nailer17 anni fa

HTTP 1.1 supports byte ranges. You likely don't have any software on your computer than does not support HTTP 1.1.

darshan17 anni fa

Since this is for those who "want to give Google Android a try, but don't feel like buying a T-Mobile G1," and not meant to be actually useful as an OS, I don't understand what this has to offer over the SDK. (The SDK runs Android in a virtualized environment on Windows, OS X, and Linux.)

I read the project summary and skimmed the "readmefirst.txt" and I still don't get it. Is it faster? Easier to install?

pierrefar17 anni fa

I love the pun/jab at MS, even if it is unintended: they included the word "live" in the name. Because the "live" brand isn't confused enough.

Good thing MS sorted out this brand mess by moving to "bing".

nailer17 anni fa

LiveCDs like LinuxHelp and Knoppix existed years before MS Live did.

martythemaniak17 anni fa

There's no need to downmod someone into oblivion just because they're not aware of a not-very-significant fact.

pufuwozu17 anni fa

I think it has more to do with the attitude and sarcasm of the comment.