What coding mnemonics do you use?
What weird coding things do you have to use statements for or other weird tricks to remember? I can never remember < or >, and only remember that < is less than from years of typing (i=0; i<30; i++).
19 comments
Not a mnemonic per se but I have melodies for common code snippets.
"public static void Main(string[] args)", which is the default method signature for the main method in C#, is a hip-hop beat. SQL statements are always metal tunes. Javascript is usually indie pop.
"public static void Main(string[] args)", which is the default method signature for the main method in C#, is a hip-hop beat. SQL statements are always metal tunes. Javascript is usually indie pop.
I also have a melody for the default method signature in Java which is the same except a slight difference in case "public static void main(String [] args)"
Please tell me you guys are actually singing the signature to a particular tune in your head like people sing the ABC song when they recite the alphabet. Because that is adorable.
Rapping arbitrary chunks of code could be a fun after-hours conference game.
Rapping arbitrary chunks of code could be a fun after-hours conference game.
You're partially correct. I do sing them, not necessarily in my head.
Just out of curiosity, do you say "array of string" or "strings" or something else?
Actually, I say "string" and then drop the bass for the square brackets.
Normally, this would honestly be a moment when I'd question if you were trolling, maybe post the fry meme image.. but. Given the topic, I actually believe you O_O
Markdown hyperlink syntax:
"squared circle" aka []() aka [word](http://link)I never remember that . = class and # = id in CSS, so I use "say no to drugs" to remember that "hash is not class".
Perhaps a mnemonic which only really works in the North East of the UK where 'class' is colloquial slang for 'good'. Also not very good if you smoke pot, I guess.
Perhaps a mnemonic which only really works in the North East of the UK where 'class' is colloquial slang for 'good'. Also not very good if you smoke pot, I guess.
I also took it to mean that it's not classy to smoke hash (i.e. 'you stay classy, San Diego' :D)
I remember the difference between class and id by thinking someone is trying to "Pound an idea into your head" or rather "# an id"
Just remember that a hashtag points to something specific. A dot means nothing, so that's the least specific/most generic thing
Strange one. FYI, "class" has the same meaning in French slang -- probably borrowed from you guys.
I think it's the other way around. I think you guys use _class_ as slang to _classy_: "pertaining to or characteristic of a (high) class," which comes from the literal sense of class, which comes from the French word _classer_.
I didn't know for sure, but I had that feeling knowing that most of the English language is borrowed from others, and not the other way around. (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&searc...)
I didn't know for sure, but I had that feeling knowing that most of the English language is borrowed from others, and not the other way around. (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&searc...)
The fact that programmers can't remember < and > well illustrates why children shouldn't be chastised for getting (for example) b and d wrong.
I have dealt with this by conditioning myself to always read < as 'is less than'
I have dealt with this by conditioning myself to always read < as 'is less than'
When I was in grad school a friend in another department said "You guys in CS have much nicer printers; can I mail you my thesis and have you print it out? And how would I mail it?" I said "Sure; Just do 'mail [email protected] less-than-symbol filename". Later he calls in a panic -- "my thesis file has disappeared! I did what you said ... oh, wait a minute, I might have done greater-than instead of less-than..."
Fortunately for both of us, he had been diligent about making backups and din't lose his entire thesis.
Fortunately for both of us, he had been diligent about making backups and din't lose his entire thesis.
I find it hard to believe that a statistically normal programmer mixes up < and >. That sounds more like dyslexia.
This is the first time I'm hearing about this too so I think there is more to it. I don't even see why a mnemonic is required since the shape of both '<' and '>' clearly demonstrate the relationship that the operator is testing.
I probably should have chosen a better mnemonic to start from! I'd point out that if you see greater and less than more like arrows it's utterly confusing. I'm not denying I'm probably weird in that respect, it's just something I have to use tricks to remember….
Also a lot of people have trouble with the back and forward slashes. When teaching html, people got the closing slash mixed up, it was all over the place.
I was surprised to see that as an example as well, but then I thought back to starting out as a programmer.
I'm sure I spent many hours fixing bugs caused by getting < and > wrong.
I'm sure I spent many hours fixing bugs caused by getting < and > wrong.
I find it hard to believe that someone actually mixes these unless they completely skipped all math classes in school.
Ah, yes the "I can't fit it to my mental model, therefore it is impossible" argument.
When little, my brother used to mix up the words "more" and "less" while speaking. I don't doubt someone could mix up > and <.
When little, my brother used to mix up the words "more" and "less" while speaking. I don't doubt someone could mix up > and <.
I used to mix it up in elementary school because the school teacher explained that "<" is "less" and ">" is "more". Even worse, she suggested to memorize it like this: |<leiner = kleiner (german, meaning less)
At some point I realized it's possible to memorize it visually, since then I never mixed it up again
At some point I realized it's possible to memorize it visually, since then I never mixed it up again
Yeah people frequently mix up left and right also. And my brother always wrote his numbers backwards or rather left to right (units on the left).
I remember several kids in my class having great difficulty with < and > when they were first introduced. I can well imagine many of them just decided it was impossible and gave up.
Was it possible to give up? In my place, they wouldn't be let on to the next grade if they'd fail basic math - i.e., they'd spend the summer repeating it + an extra year in the same grade if that wasn't enough; so it would have to be a real exception to see a 10 year old who can't somehow manage that.
Anyways, the classic mnemonic for that was simple - for < and > the wide part contains more 'thingies' than the narrow part. They're actually taught before numbers or together with numbers, like [pic of four strawberries] > [pic of three strawberries].
Anyways, the classic mnemonic for that was simple - for < and > the wide part contains more 'thingies' than the narrow part. They're actually taught before numbers or together with numbers, like [pic of four strawberries] > [pic of three strawberries].
I was taught the crocodile thing, but had real issues with it: I can think it through but it's not fast. I'm pretty much ambidexterous (i.e. write with left and catch a ball with my right) so while I can do quite a lot of things with both hands I also have problems with left and right!
I've known a few otherwise non-dyslexic programmers that have had this issue. One guy kept a sticky note on his monitor with "> Greater, < Less" written on it.
I find that really fascinating. Was it just those things? What about which paren (or brace) opens and which one closes? (I'm not being facetious!)
Teacher in elementary school taught me simple rule: signs < and > has two endings on one side and one ending (corner) on another. So two bigger than one and bigger number should be on side with two endings.
Mine taught us that it was an alligator, and it always wanted to eat the bigger number.
Interesting. So other people too do get it mixed up. Makes me feel less silly when I find bits of my own code that looks like `x := >- receiverChannel`
I've always thought it's because of carelessness
I've always thought it's because of carelessness
LoVe HAte when ordering psudeo classes in css for anchors*
":link, :visited, :hover, :active"
Also CSS related, when doing margin/padding I use "TRouBLe" to remember:
margin: (T R B L)Do you have one for border-radius? Because I still can't remember the order of those..
That's the one I use as well.
Although I can never remember the 3 parameter verision
margin: (T R&L B)
Although I can never remember the 3 parameter verision
margin: (T R&L B)
I heard "Las Vegas Hells Angels" and it's stuck with me.
That's far more rock'n'roll, I might make the switch. Now I just need to remember...
'Naughty Llama Holidaymakers Book Lovely Vacation Homes from AirBNB'
= N.L.H.B.L.V.H.A = 'not Love Hate but Las Vegas Hells Angels'.
'Naughty Llama Holidaymakers Book Lovely Vacation Homes from AirBNB'
= N.L.H.B.L.V.H.A = 'not Love Hate but Las Vegas Hells Angels'.
Questionably coding, but I always loved this IRC snippet:
<sdmkun> tar -xzf merc.tgz what the fuck
<sdmkun> how the fuck do you people remember this shit
<bucketmouse> just think with a german accent
<bucketmouse> XTRACT ZE FILES
<sdmkun> tar -xzf merc.tgz what the fuck
<sdmkun> how the fuck do you people remember this shit
<bucketmouse> just think with a german accent
<bucketmouse> XTRACT ZE FILES
I really don't see what the big deal is with tar. Everyone seems to hate it. Probably because exactly one of those flags is necessary: zcat merc.tgz | tar -x
I quite like it, and have almost a singalong bit for the meaning attached to each character I add to a long tar command
tar - [create] [verbosely] [a g/bzip'd compressed] [file named] foo.tgz (from) input_dir
tar -cvzf foo.tgz input_dir
Your version doesn't seem as 'fun', I guess zcat and PIPE are just hard to rhyme along to.
tar - [create] [verbosely] [a g/bzip'd compressed] [file named] foo.tgz (from) input_dir
tar -cvzf foo.tgz input_dir
Your version doesn't seem as 'fun', I guess zcat and PIPE are just hard to rhyme along to.
Don't memorize. Use unp:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/unp
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/unp
I was taught the alligator/crocodile thing like many others, but it never really stuck. For some reason (later in life), someone said "left hand, less than" as they held up their left hand to form a less than sign. That image sticks in my head a lot better.
Another thing that was particularly hard to get naturally was the ternary operator. It didn't sink in easily until Jon Skeet said pretend the ? is indeed a question. If the answer is 'yes', this will happen.
Another thing that was particularly hard to get naturally was the ternary operator. It didn't sink in easily until Jon Skeet said pretend the ? is indeed a question. If the answer is 'yes', this will happen.
Not related to programming but close
The symbol for a diode is something like this: --|>|--
Now, which one is the Anode, which one is the Cathode
Very simple, the Anode has an A in the drawing (left side, turned 90 degrees), the Cathode (K) has a K, right side, upside down in the drawing
The symbol for a diode is something like this: --|>|--
Now, which one is the Anode, which one is the Cathode
Very simple, the Anode has an A in the drawing (left side, turned 90 degrees), the Cathode (K) has a K, right side, upside down in the drawing
.unshift - makes it bigger. Longer word than .shift
.shift - makes it smaller. Shorter word than .unshift
.shift - makes it smaller. Shorter word than .unshift
I could never remember this until someone told me to imagine that an array is like a row of chairs at a cinema.
"Shift" will shift everyone up one, bumping someone off the start of the row.
"Shift" will shift everyone up one, bumping someone off the start of the row.
When working with axis - "X is a-cross"
" You have to run, before you can fly,
You have to X, before you can Y ",
Rhyming reminder of which axis is vertical, and which horizontal...
Rhyming reminder of which axis is vertical, and which horizontal...
'Y to the sky!'
Wise up! ;) (Y's up)
Yes! Another one I use
You might try a visual trick. Note that < and > look like "arrows" and "point" in a particular direction. There is a small end (the tip/point) and a large end (the open end). The vertical size of the point is "less than" the vertical size of open end. So if the point comes first (reading left to right) then the point is "less than" the opening (and the symbol means "less than"), but if the opening comes first (reading left to right), the opening is "greater than" the point (and the symbol means "greater than").
.
Imagine the arrows are crocodiles.
They always try and eat more.
1 < 2
4 > 1
If they're eating less, they're not happy crocodiles.
1 < 2
4 > 1
If they're eating less, they're not happy crocodiles.
Or the "is greater than" (>) is a crocodile's mouth, and "is less than" (<) is a bird's beak. The bird eats smaller food than an crocodile eats, and the crocodile eats bigger food than the bird eats.
Or maybe as snork-eater-eaters
http://wharble.com/sites/default/files/Snork-Eater_Eater.jpg
http://wharble.com/sites/default/files/Snork-Eater_Eater.jpg
I don't know if this is common, but I visualise numbers on a line which makes it amazingly easy to use the 'arrows' metaphor
< > That seems ambiguous to me in several ways. There must be more semantics you are subconsciously depending on to clarify it.
I think he means that he visualizes the pair "< >" relative to a line of numbers. Similar to how he placed it above a line of numbers in his ASCII art. < points down (left) the row of numbers to numbers that are less than the other ones and > points up (right) to numbers that are greater than. Makes perfect sense if you are a visual thinker.
Exactly this - thanks for clarifying my explanation
You can make it even simpler than that: just put the big number next to the big end of the glyph and vice versa.
I use the same visual trick (more or less, looking at < and > as arrows, or if you want, spears) but I visualise bigger numbers as more "powerful" numbers that poke the "weak", smaller numbers with the pointy bit :D That's how I imagined them when I was a small child and that's how I still "see" them :D
Numbers are cruel and ruthless :)
Numbers are cruel and ruthless :)
I'm not convinced programmers even need a mnemonic for < and >. After all, they'll read and write those glyphs millions of times in their lifetime.
At least for me, the metaphors that I used to learn the symbols as a child have become my enduring mental models of those constructions, even if they're not actually needed to recall them any more.
Oh, I didn't realise anyone didn't remember it that way! I remember being taught it, but just assumed everyone else was, I guess.
< and > are pretty easy. The big side (the mouth) points to the larger number because that it what it wants to eat.
I learned this in school. Still effective.
But I never know which one is "smaller than" or "bigger than", I have to think a little bit
But I never know which one is "smaller than" or "bigger than", I have to think a little bit
Or you're pointing (or poking fun) at the little guy.
Most methods in C read like an assignment,
so if you are trying to remember what order the arguments to strcpy go, it's
so if you are trying to remember what order the arguments to strcpy go, it's
strcpy(x,y) is like x = y
The trick with typedef is it is exactly the same syntax, in all cases, as declaring a variable of that type. This is essentially the only way you're going to ever remember how to do function pointer typedefs: typedef int (function_t)(int,int); // or something to that effect
For the right-hand rule, a vile insult: take the cross-product of the thumb and forefinger of your right hand and rotate on it.
Look, Joshua Foer says that emotional imagery is more likely to stick...
Look, Joshua Foer says that emotional imagery is more likely to stick...
I don't use mnemonics in general. For me the effort to remember the mnemonic is actually double that for remembering the thing per se. I need to once remember the symbols->mnemonic connection and then the mnemonic->meaning connection, instead of simply the direct symbols->meaning one. It feels like cluttering my brain with junk that not only doesn't make it easier to remember things, it actively makes it harder.
When using ln to link files, I tend to recite:
ln -s "what you want," "where you want it"
ln -s "what you want," "where you want it"
Another way to remember, is that ln behaves the same as cp
sounds like you may need lns:
http://interglacial.com/~sburke/pub/lns.html
http://interglacial.com/~sburke/pub/lns.html
backslash is a man falling backwards. forwardslash is the opposite.
"dollar hat, dollar at" in Makefiles:
$(CC) -c $^ -o $@
$(CC) -c $^ -o $@
\r\n or \n\r?
ReturN - R before N
ReturN - R before N
Carriage Return is first because it takes much more time for the carriage to go back to the column 0 from the column 79, than for the paper to Line Feed one line. So while the carriage is flying back, the paper can feed, and hopefully we won't have to wait too much time for everything to be ready for a new line. Or we may always insert some Nul codes to wait.