Adobes Creative Cloud is great for professionals, not hobbyists(screamingatmyscreen.com)
screamingatmyscreen.com
Adobes Creative Cloud is great for professionals, not hobbyists
http://www.screamingatmyscreen.com/2013/5/adobes-creative-cloud-is-great-for-professionals-not-hobbyists/
1 comments
Author here. I didn't think of them - most digital arts or however it is called students I know get a copy of the current master suite from their university.
Since the creative work is done by other people I am not fully aware of all the advantages and differences, so your analogy is likely better - even if Gimp fans will likely disagree ;)
Since the creative work is done by other people I am not fully aware of all the advantages and differences, so your analogy is likely better - even if Gimp fans will likely disagree ;)
Yes, they do! However, some art students I know would like to freelance while studying to pay off their student loans. The student edition won't allow them (legally anyway) to make money off of their work.
> I think Gimp vs. Photoshop is the vim vs. Emacs for digital artists.
As a programmer and a hobbyist painter, the analogy should be more like (vim/emacs/sublime) vs MS Notepad. While GIMP is great for general photo manipulation and editing, it is out of Photoshop's league when it comes to painting.