Google bans tethering app from Android Market(itworld.com)
itworld.com
Google bans tethering app from Android Market
http://www.itworld.com/mobile-amp-wireless/65504/google-bans-tethering-app-android-market
A developer is reporting that Google has banned his tethering application from the Android Market, one of the first hints that the store may not be as open as Google has promised.
2 comments
Of course, you could just go download the APK from somewhere else.
I doubt many people (myself included) would have -any- issues with the App Store's restrictions if, like the Android Market, it wasn't the exclusive and only way for distributing applications, and you could distribute the binary like you can distribute an EXE or DMG.
I doubt many people (myself included) would have -any- issues with the App Store's restrictions if, like the Android Market, it wasn't the exclusive and only way for distributing applications, and you could distribute the binary like you can distribute an EXE or DMG.
Exactly. There's also slideme.org, an open alternative to android market.
> The application lets users connect their G1 Android phones via Wi-Fi to their laptops and then access the Internet from the laptop using the phone's cellular connection.
This is stupid. So T-Mobile has a problem with using their paid-for service more?
I access my internet from a phone - this is just stupid. Why would they have a problem with something that gives them extra revenue?
Connecting your phone to your computer as a modem is a standard feature for all other phones.
This is stupid. So T-Mobile has a problem with using their paid-for service more?
I access my internet from a phone - this is just stupid. Why would they have a problem with something that gives them extra revenue?
Connecting your phone to your computer as a modem is a standard feature for all other phones.
> Why would they have a problem with something that gives them extra revenue?
Because the data plan isn't metered. Tethering will cost them capacity they aren't billing to anyone. Sort of how like you can get in trouble for using a residential cable modem in a business--consumers get a price break and power users pay more.
> Connecting your phone to your computer as a modem is a standard feature for all other phones.
Not totally true, the iPhone is just now getting this in the upcoming 3.0 release for example. Many times tethering requires a more expensive data plan with the carrier and that may turn out to be the case with both Android and iPhone.
Because the data plan isn't metered. Tethering will cost them capacity they aren't billing to anyone. Sort of how like you can get in trouble for using a residential cable modem in a business--consumers get a price break and power users pay more.
> Connecting your phone to your computer as a modem is a standard feature for all other phones.
Not totally true, the iPhone is just now getting this in the upcoming 3.0 release for example. Many times tethering requires a more expensive data plan with the carrier and that may turn out to be the case with both Android and iPhone.
> Because the data plan isn't metered.
Fair enough. In my country it is (I did not think that there was a country that did not charge for its data).I use a SIM with pre-paid on it which is nice (no contracts, nothing).
> Sort of how like you can get in trouble for using a residential cable modem in a business--consumers get a price break and power users pay more.
This is actually just a devious scheme to rip companies off.
> Not totally true, the iPhone is just now getting this in the upcoming 3.0 release for example.
Maybe. I only personally know of one person with an iPhone (again, it is more popular in the states). Most newish (e.g. last 4 years) phones (from Nokia or Samsung) have 3G built-in (when compared to iPhone's EDGE).
Also, connecting to the Internet using these phones' modems is straight forward and the majority of them accept micro-USB (through which it also charges).
Fair enough. In my country it is (I did not think that there was a country that did not charge for its data).I use a SIM with pre-paid on it which is nice (no contracts, nothing).
> Sort of how like you can get in trouble for using a residential cable modem in a business--consumers get a price break and power users pay more.
This is actually just a devious scheme to rip companies off.
> Not totally true, the iPhone is just now getting this in the upcoming 3.0 release for example.
Maybe. I only personally know of one person with an iPhone (again, it is more popular in the states). Most newish (e.g. last 4 years) phones (from Nokia or Samsung) have 3G built-in (when compared to iPhone's EDGE).
Also, connecting to the Internet using these phones' modems is straight forward and the majority of them accept micro-USB (through which it also charges).
> Fair enough. In my country it is (I did not think that there was a country that did not charge for its data).I use a SIM with pre-paid on it which is nice (no contracts, nothing).
In the US it's common to require unlimited data packages for smartphones. The G1 and iPhone are examples of that. It's also common with BlackBerry. It's uncommon to pay by the megabyte here, you either don't have internet access or have unlimited (well, "unlimited") access.
In the US it's common to require unlimited data packages for smartphones. The G1 and iPhone are examples of that. It's also common with BlackBerry. It's uncommon to pay by the megabyte here, you either don't have internet access or have unlimited (well, "unlimited") access.
It may be uncommon but there are limited data plan options where you pay by megabytes. (T-Mobile has a couple)
But those options are not available on all phones. The G1 for example requires T-Mobile's unlimited data plan which costs $24.99/month. (FWIW the iPhone is the same way, but AT&t's plan is more expensive.)
Consumers don't get a price break. They get shafted just as hard as the rest.
I am not a T-Mobile costumer, but maybe they have another plan/hardware/usb dongle which allows internet access from laptops? So they want these people to pay differently.
PS: not making any judgements :)
PS: not making any judgements :)