Lenovo reveals 27-inch touchscreen AIO-tablet Windows 8 PC(neowin.net)
neowin.net
Lenovo reveals 27-inch touchscreen AIO-tablet Windows 8 PC
http://www.neowin.net/news/lenovo-reveals-27-inch-touchscreen-aio-tablet-windows-8-pc-testing-39-incher?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
50 comments
Actually sounds great to me.
It's not meant to be something you put under your arm, but for it to be your family's main computer. And is portable within the house, e.g., set up in the kitchen or the living room -- w/o requiring power. And can also be used as a tabletop computer.
I wanted a Sony Vaio Tap 20, but I may hold out for this now.
The Android emulation though is not needed. Toss that.
It's not meant to be something you put under your arm, but for it to be your family's main computer. And is portable within the house, e.g., set up in the kitchen or the living room -- w/o requiring power. And can also be used as a tabletop computer.
I wanted a Sony Vaio Tap 20, but I may hold out for this now.
The Android emulation though is not needed. Toss that.
Ehmm, we are speaking about 27" or 39" inch sized screens. Your kids can't take it to the other room alone.
I agree completely. This seems like a great multi-purpose machine, not small enough to be a tablet that you have to keep close to your face, and not big enough to be a desktop that you have to leave in a single place. Offers a great screen size and multi-user interface.
We have the Sony and its a blast with the kids. Got it just in time for the holidays and with 4 kids playing on it together was fun. The apps were limited on win8 though. With android apps, I can imagine it will be even more fun!
In practice, does it remain stationary and tethered to the power cord? Or is the portability useful?
It was more fun when it was in the middle of the room with the kids playing either setback joyride or fruit ninja. Its stable on stand but only as much fun as any other desktop. (not much for the kids)
This would be amazing for a digital audio workstation. Something like Ableton Live built from the ground up to run on this would be a game changer.
In fact, Uwe Schmidt, one of the most forward-thinking electronic musicians in the business, said in the mid-90s that something exactly like this would be his ideal music tool. He was just 15 years too early.
In fact, Uwe Schmidt, one of the most forward-thinking electronic musicians in the business, said in the mid-90s that something exactly like this would be his ideal music tool. He was just 15 years too early.
Think of this as a Desktop or even a TV replacement, it's not supposed to be an iPad competitor.
Or think of it as a foreshadowing of a touchscreen iMac. I don't think Apple would put a battery in theirs, however. I think most people would be satisfied with just AC.
Honestly, at some point the battery is nice just as a faux-UPS. It's one of the nice things about having a laptop that you just don't have with desktops.
Battery is nice when you kick the kids out of the dinner table and they go to another room... No shutdown reboot. Also plugged in is great at a desk but at a dining table it means a tripping hazard. No biggie but a little battery would be great.
http://news.lenovo.com/news+releases/lenovo-pioneers-interpe...
OK, found the press release. It's running Windows 8, then a custom UI shell when laying flat.
Apps are from a Lenovo-rebranded Intel AppUp store, Bluestack Android, and the Windows App Store. Also includes a handful of custom electronic gameboard pieces, and it comes pre-loaded with Miscellaneous Other Stuff.
Ships summer, $1,699 base price likely.
This sounds like a UX apocalypse, but if everything's properly bound into the Windows 8 Metro UI, maybe it'll feel seamless.
Gods, I don't know. I'd strangle for a 30" table iPad, so there has to be something to this concept. But a two inch thick iMac with a fan and HDD lying on its back? Arf.
OK, found the press release. It's running Windows 8, then a custom UI shell when laying flat.
Apps are from a Lenovo-rebranded Intel AppUp store, Bluestack Android, and the Windows App Store. Also includes a handful of custom electronic gameboard pieces, and it comes pre-loaded with Miscellaneous Other Stuff.
Ships summer, $1,699 base price likely.
This sounds like a UX apocalypse, but if everything's properly bound into the Windows 8 Metro UI, maybe it'll feel seamless.
Gods, I don't know. I'd strangle for a 30" table iPad, so there has to be something to this concept. But a two inch thick iMac with a fan and HDD lying on its back? Arf.
Where did you get information about fan? And if HDD will be solid state nothing wrong with it.
The marketing shows it powered by a full Intel Core-series chip, and I haven't heard of anyone successfully doing a fan-free design with anything in that family.
The default HDD will be a physical HDD. A SSD is optional, at least according to the story.
The default HDD will be a physical HDD. A SSD is optional, at least according to the story.
Excellent idea for boardgames and family games. I know quite a few DMs who would die for this.
Amen. Board games, PDFs, proofs, comps, mass image review and management, oh man... the things you could do with this real estate.
The resolution is 1920x1080, the same as my 21" monitors.
Really? I was hoping it would be 2560x1440.
The 1920x1080 screen resolution really needs to stop being the only choice as far as desktops.
The 1920x1080 screen resolution really needs to stop being the only choice as far as desktops.
I very much like the idea of physical tokens that are smart enough to interact with the touchscreen. That's a massively cool idea that I most definitely wish I had thought of.
EDIT: Although, too little resolution. This damn rMBP has ruined me for lower pixel density screens.
EDIT: Although, too little resolution. This damn rMBP has ruined me for lower pixel density screens.
Did anyone else notice how laggy the display looked when she spun the roulette wheel? I hope that's not system wide.
Presumably these won't be owned by the same households as those in the Chromebook commercials ... where people are stepping on the computer, and tossing spaghetti about? A 27" screen with a narrow hinge holding it up that's designed to be pressed by children? What could possibly go wrong?
No, that would be the richer variant of those families. Chromebooks go for $200. $1700 for this beast is a whole different league.
the guy laid down the device while holding his coffee. i wonder what protection they put for coffee spills. and they put it on the floor, how strong is it if kids accidentally step on it?
I've long wanted a touchscreen desktop. Not a desktop computer like we use the term now, but as the display IS the whole desktop.
sounds like it would be nice to build into a desk (i.e. have a recessed cavity in the desktop so that the touchscreen is flat with the surface of the desk). you could do the "office of the future" thing the science fiction movies are always speculating about.
There is an interesting part of this video that illustrates just how hard multi-user multi-touch is to do right: Note that the scene of the girls "fingerpainting" is faked.
Why fake it? Drawing programs are very modal: You have one brush, with one set of properties. You have one selection you can move or operate on. One property sheet to edit. Etc. Except for games with their own interaction framework, most OSs assume one user with one selection in one document at a time. It may seem like a trivial change, but true realtime collaboration on a single screen seems to demand a UX system designed to support that.
Why fake it? Drawing programs are very modal: You have one brush, with one set of properties. You have one selection you can move or operate on. One property sheet to edit. Etc. Except for games with their own interaction framework, most OSs assume one user with one selection in one document at a time. It may seem like a trivial change, but true realtime collaboration on a single screen seems to demand a UX system designed to support that.
"Why fake it?"
Because the shot is setup to appear as if you're looking up at the girls from inside the device.
Because the shot is setup to appear as if you're looking up at the girls from inside the device.
This is interesting, but is it usable? Do you have space on your table? Would you snuggle up on the couch to watch a movie with someone with this held between the two of you? Does it fit down your hallway without turning it sideways? Would you need a butler to carry it and hold it just right for each task?
This is just an object lesson in why Windows 8 is an answer to a question nobody asked.
This is just an object lesson in why Windows 8 is an answer to a question nobody asked.
This is exactly the question I want answered. The idea of a 30" piece of glass running multitouch software is intoxicating. Microsoft tried and shipped it but the units were so barkingly expensive and shitty to set up they went nowhere. Actually using one was marvelous though.
A quick and dirty extrapolation of iPad's design up by 5.2X gives you 7.5 pounds (and the obligatory 10mm thickness and 10 hour battery life). This doesn't have to be a fan-driven HDD-bearing poke-ass monstrosity. There must be software experiences that are materially better at these colossal sizes. And it's clearly technically possible... but the whole Windows hardware idiom is anchoring this down into goofy territory.
If it can be made "properly", does it have a place in the real world? I want the answer.
A quick and dirty extrapolation of iPad's design up by 5.2X gives you 7.5 pounds (and the obligatory 10mm thickness and 10 hour battery life). This doesn't have to be a fan-driven HDD-bearing poke-ass monstrosity. There must be software experiences that are materially better at these colossal sizes. And it's clearly technically possible... but the whole Windows hardware idiom is anchoring this down into goofy territory.
If it can be made "properly", does it have a place in the real world? I want the answer.
Two things about that:
1. And it's clearly technically possible...
2. If it can be made "properly"...
Consider how hard it would be to turn any particular app that assumes a single user into one where two people can operate on the same "document" or "world" at the same time. I figure you need a UX system with that concept baked into it before you even start writing those apps.
1. And it's clearly technically possible...
2. If it can be made "properly"...
Consider how hard it would be to turn any particular app that assumes a single user into one where two people can operate on the same "document" or "world" at the same time. I figure you need a UX system with that concept baked into it before you even start writing those apps.
> "Does it fit down your hallway without turning it sideways?"
Hallways in most of the US are required to be 36" wide. This should accommodate even the 39" diagonal screen currently being tested.
Most of your objections-as-questions seem similarly overblown.
Hallways in most of the US are required to be 36" wide. This should accommodate even the 39" diagonal screen currently being tested.
Most of your objections-as-questions seem similarly overblown.
The concept is wrong. They better start making tables with touch aware surface and built in user interface. And no Windows please.
As Mark Shuttleworth said, no OS has ever succeeded by emulating another OS (why they chose not to build a Dalvik VM for Ubuntu phone). The fact that it runs Android apps in this way is not going to make this thing a best seller. If Android apps are the biggest part of the buying decision, then most people would just go straight to an Android device, instead of dealing with such a solution. This is why the Android emulator has also never worked for RIM (and never will).
One example of an OS that succeeded by emulating another OS is OS X. It came with a well-developed OS9 emulation strategy. Even though it didn't get used very often, the existence of a smooth transition strategy was key to its success.
IBM has also done fabulously well emulating various old mainframe operating systems.
Emulation strategies are never the be-all and end-all, but if you want to be a "successor for X", you need to have an emulation story.
Emulation, virtualization and dual-booting are a very large part of the reason of the success of OS X. A Mac is the only machine that will run OS9, OS X, Windows & Linux software. So people buy one knowing that they won't be stuck if they end up not liking OS X or needing a critical app. Then they end up staying on OS X.
So to be a successor to something, you need to:
1) have an emulation or virtualization story so that people won't be afraid to switch
2) be significantly better so people end up not actually using the emulation or virtualization.
IBM has also done fabulously well emulating various old mainframe operating systems.
Emulation strategies are never the be-all and end-all, but if you want to be a "successor for X", you need to have an emulation story.
Emulation, virtualization and dual-booting are a very large part of the reason of the success of OS X. A Mac is the only machine that will run OS9, OS X, Windows & Linux software. So people buy one knowing that they won't be stuck if they end up not liking OS X or needing a critical app. Then they end up staying on OS X.
So to be a successor to something, you need to:
1) have an emulation or virtualization story so that people won't be afraid to switch
2) be significantly better so people end up not actually using the emulation or virtualization.
>A Mac is the only machine that will run OS9, OS X, Windows & Linux software.
Technically, you are incorrect. You can't run OS9 on the Intel machines and you can't run Windows on PPC machines.
Technically, you are incorrect. You can't run OS9 on the Intel machines and you can't run Windows on PPC machines.
Not today but for six years mac os x shipped on powerpc and could emulate mac os 9 and x86 (via several software emulation options).
You can probably find a decent "classic" option for intel macs if you look hard enough, but that wasn't the original point.
You can probably find a decent "classic" option for intel macs if you look hard enough, but that wasn't the original point.
[deleted]
Okay, but what I really meant is a competitor's OS, and an OS that is still successful, not one that is getting obsolete and forgotten, and you're only emulating it because it's your own OS and because you want to maintain backwards compatibility.
This is not like Xbox360 being able to run Xbox-1 games. This is like Xbox360 being able to run PS3 games. Big difference. I don't think Xbox360 would've been successful if they said "Here we have 5 games of our own, and 100 from PS3". I think most people would've still gone with the PS3, if it had that many games at that point compared to the Xbox360, instead of dealing with PS3 emulation for Xbox360 just to get those 5 extra games.
This is not like Xbox360 being able to run Xbox-1 games. This is like Xbox360 being able to run PS3 games. Big difference. I don't think Xbox360 would've been successful if they said "Here we have 5 games of our own, and 100 from PS3". I think most people would've still gone with the PS3, if it had that many games at that point compared to the Xbox360, instead of dealing with PS3 emulation for Xbox360 just to get those 5 extra games.
"As Mark Shuttleworth said, no OS has ever succeeded by emulating another OS (why they chose not to build a Dalvik VM for Ubuntu phone). "
When I started using Linux, having a working DOS emulator was a very significant issue for me. Today, many Windows games work just fine under wine, not to mention actual applications.
I think it's a big deal for the changers.
When I started using Linux, having a working DOS emulator was a very significant issue for me. Today, many Windows games work just fine under wine, not to mention actual applications.
I think it's a big deal for the changers.
Except windows emulating itself of course (WoW). Its so good, most people don't even realize it exists.
That is because the underlying hardware was never powerful enough to support the emulation or the emulation code was not efficient enough. With the current virtualization technology and powerful hardware, I doubt why this would not be effective.
Anyone want to bet this actually ships?
Wow, who would buy this? This just doesn't make any sense to me. It's not really portable and it has terrible battery life. I would take a Mac Mini + a nice Dell screen over this any day.
It is the perfect size to be portable within your house and I would think of the battery power more as a way to easily move it between rooms without having to shut it down.
But would that give you a touchscreen?
Is "Mac Mini + a nice Dell screen" really portable and does it have excellent battery life?
Your criteria seem to be inconsistent.
Your criteria seem to be inconsistent.
A 27" touchscreen is not for work, it is for working out!
I once bought a notebook with touchscreen, and even have tapped it a few times. In a while I have forgotten it had a touchscreen.
I once bought a notebook with touchscreen, and even have tapped it a few times. In a while I have forgotten it had a touchscreen.
I know this will get downvoted but judging from the comments, we've reached a point where self-proclaimed geeks (from the Apple camp, the one that's supposed to think differently) just can't handle innovation...
Downvote away (fan)boys...
Downvote away (fan)boys...
And it's $1700 and comes with a HDD. The optional SSD is 64GB.
And the intended use case is your five year olds painting on it? WHAT.