QueryHub(queryhub.ai)

22 pointsby joeharwood3anno scorso10 comments

https://www.queryhub.ai/blog/introducing-queryhub

4 comments

Oracle's plug and play kind of approach with Select AI looks more flexible as it allows bringing in the choice to choose LLMs (https://www.oracle.com/autonomous-database/select-ai/)

joeharwood3anno scorso

Hey thanks for the feedback! Would also like to add more LLMs in the future! :)

skeptruneanno scorso

AI is a place where the elephants are dancing

esafakanno scorso

Your value proposition needs to be clarified, because it naively seems that one could accomplish the same thing by feeding your database' schema to an LLM and having it generate the query. That has the virtue of being almost free and not introducing a new tool. A̶l̶s̶o̶,̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶r̶ ̶p̶r̶i̶c̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶p̶a̶g̶e̶ ̶l̶i̶n̶k̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶b̶r̶o̶k̶e̶n̶.̶

joeharwood3anno scorso

Thanks for the feedback — it’s really helpful. You’re right that giving an LLM a schema and prompting it directly is a viable option for some users, especially those comfortable with that workflow. I think where I see Queryhub going is a one-stop plug-and-play for database querying, I want to eventually make a single interface across Postgres, Mysql, Snowflake, Oracle etc., with a consistent UX dedicated to querying and data insights in one place.

esafakanno scorso

The big players like Google, Snowflake, and Oracle already do this. And self-hosters are technically proficient, so they can go to straight to the LLM. Who then do you believe are your ideal customers?

joeharwood3anno scorso

Also thanks for the headup on pricing, fixed :)

nikolayasdf123anno scorso

why the logo image is so blurry. so hard to read

joeharwood3anno scorso

Thanks for the headsup seems to be only on mobile, will fix now!

joeharwood3anno scorso

fixed thank you for the headsup :)

[deleted]anno scorso