The Evolution of the Web(evolutionoftheweb.com)
evolutionoftheweb.com
The Evolution of the Web
http://www.evolutionoftheweb.com/#/evolution/day
10 comments
Nice visualisation, very pretty but as others have stated, not very usable. One thing this demonstrates clearly is at the breakneck speed the web is evolving at the moment, the mess from 2008 onwards clearly shows this.
While i wasn't worried before, it kind of reaffirms my feeling of security of the ability to make a living as a web developer, I doubt i'll starve in the next 10+ years...
While i wasn't worried before, it kind of reaffirms my feeling of security of the ability to make a living as a web developer, I doubt i'll starve in the next 10+ years...
Technology wise I think it's great. However, from a clarity point of view and ease of interpretation I think it needs more work as it takes a fair amount of brainpower to try and digest. It's no easy task though picturing the evolution of the web so hats off to them!
This is about as clear a visualization as you can get to show that the mere existence of Chrome has rewritten what "evolution" means for the web.
According to the graph, there were 100 million internet users in 1996, and the same number in 2001.
I find that questionable.
I find that questionable.
[deleted]
[deleted]
No Netscape Navigator?
This is a nice web technologies demo, and there is good information in here ( I especially like the browser screenshots), but the thing I find most striking about this is how useless it is at visually illustrating the 'evolution' of the web.
I wrote a blog post about this when it first appeared last September: http://halfblog.net/2011/09/01/the-evolution-of-the-web/
Now it has become even flashier, and even more cluttered and confusing. The swooping colourful lines mean absolutely nothing. I realise they arc through the different browsers to (roughly) the point at which those browsers adopted the technology, but the swoops themselves only serve to confuse the information.
Very much a case of style over substance. This is a horrible infographic, and I'm confused why it seems to be so popular.
I wrote a blog post about this when it first appeared last September: http://halfblog.net/2011/09/01/the-evolution-of-the-web/
Now it has become even flashier, and even more cluttered and confusing. The swooping colourful lines mean absolutely nothing. I realise they arc through the different browsers to (roughly) the point at which those browsers adopted the technology, but the swoops themselves only serve to confuse the information.
Very much a case of style over substance. This is a horrible infographic, and I'm confused why it seems to be so popular.
I agree.
The swirling lines begin to tell an interesting story: from 1994-1997, and then again from 2008-2012, lots of technologies enter the picture, so we get some sense of when the bursts of innovation happen.
The clutter of the lines - and their tending to vertical rather than more horizontally slanted - suggests that browser adoption of technologies is quicker from 2008 on.
But this is impressionistic at best, and vertical vs. horizontal in the technology adoption lines is mostly a side effect of how close the lines representing the browsers adopting the tech are to one another.
I'm also wondering about when the tech lines are introduced. E.g. web fonts (in purple, swooping in from the bottom) shows up around 2000 but doesn't hit a browser version till 2008.
CSS2D transforms (purple, from the top) starts in 2009, swooping backwards in time to hit Safari 3.1 in 2008.
If these two swoops correspond to the real story that web fonts were designed much earlier than they were adopted, and CSS2D transforms were implemented before they were formally designed (perhaps by W3C), then that would be very cool. But I fear it's just as likely that the introduction points are arbitrary.
If anyone knows the stories of the design and adoption of CSS2D transforms or webfonts, I'd be grateful for a little enlightenment.
The swirling lines begin to tell an interesting story: from 1994-1997, and then again from 2008-2012, lots of technologies enter the picture, so we get some sense of when the bursts of innovation happen.
The clutter of the lines - and their tending to vertical rather than more horizontally slanted - suggests that browser adoption of technologies is quicker from 2008 on.
But this is impressionistic at best, and vertical vs. horizontal in the technology adoption lines is mostly a side effect of how close the lines representing the browsers adopting the tech are to one another.
I'm also wondering about when the tech lines are introduced. E.g. web fonts (in purple, swooping in from the bottom) shows up around 2000 but doesn't hit a browser version till 2008.
CSS2D transforms (purple, from the top) starts in 2009, swooping backwards in time to hit Safari 3.1 in 2008.
If these two swoops correspond to the real story that web fonts were designed much earlier than they were adopted, and CSS2D transforms were implemented before they were formally designed (perhaps by W3C), then that would be very cool. But I fear it's just as likely that the introduction points are arbitrary.
If anyone knows the stories of the design and adoption of CSS2D transforms or webfonts, I'd be grateful for a little enlightenment.
I was staring at it a long time, trying to make sense of the swirling color lines.
I knew somebody had to be a party pooper. Congratulations.
The most interesting thing about the evolution of the web is when Chrome arrives in 2008. Chrome has essentially remained unchanged visually since 1.0. Look at the design of browsers change once Chrome hits. Pretty remarkable.
It's pretty clear that Chrome's release was vital to the modern web of today. The most obvious one is the GUI, but they changed the game for web technologies and the speed at which we interact with the web.
Firefox introduced extensions and changed the game for a lot of us. Then they basically took a nap for 5 years until Chrome came out. I wish I knew what went wrong...