Why isn't Canonical using Android?
3 comments
It's not "Ubuntu for phones", i.e. a replacement OS. It's "Ubuntu for Android", an addition to Android.[1]
Canonical enables Android phone users to have the benefit of a full desktop, but also keep Android and its apps. If you ask me it's a smart move.
[1] http://www.ubuntu.com/devices/android
Because Android's UI framework is quite behind that of iOS and even that of Windows Phone's. Forking and fixing the UI framework is not doable.
Besides Ubuntu is in OS business, they would rather offer an alternative to Android.
Besides Ubuntu is in OS business, they would rather offer an alternative to Android.
All due respect, that seems like a knee-jerk answer to a knee-jerk question.
The mobile Ubuntu for Phones is actually entitled "Ubuntu for Android", and is billed as "The full PC desktop for multi-core Android phones".
That seems to stand in stark contrast to literally everything you said.
The mobile Ubuntu for Phones is actually entitled "Ubuntu for Android", and is billed as "The full PC desktop for multi-core Android phones".
That seems to stand in stark contrast to literally everything you said.
I was thinking more of tablets actually. It's not a secret that Ubuntu has aspirations in this segment. Jumping from tablets to phones is much almost trivial.
because Android is slow and We need c++/Qt.
One of the first problems with a new OS is the ecosystem (see webOS) and Android already has more apps than you can shake a stick at, why not use that instead of trying to port Ubuntu apps to ARM?
Amazon has been very successful by forking Android for the Fire, why not do the same?