Ask HN: I need a non-cryptic open source software license
2 comments
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
* Allowed to remix (create derivative works)
* Allowed to share (copy and distribute the work)
* Share alike (distribution must be under the same license)
* Attribution is required
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
* Allowed to remix (create derivative works)
* Allowed to share (copy and distribute the work)
* Share alike (distribution must be under the same license)
* Attribution is required
CC says you shouldn't release any code or software under their license.
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
I believe you want an MIT license.http://www.opensource.org/licenses/MIT
The MIT license doesn't require that derivative works also be released under the same license; you need a copyleft license for that kind of requirement.
You know, the boilerplate I used for MIT was a copyleft derivative and I never really glanced at the original.
http://snk.tuxfamily.org/log/copyleft-mit-license.html
contains the license I've used, but, is not the source where I grabbed the text. I should re-evaluate that. Thanks for the reminder.
http://snk.tuxfamily.org/log/copyleft-mit-license.html
contains the license I've used, but, is not the source where I grabbed the text. I should re-evaluate that. Thanks for the reminder.
I'm sure a license like this exists, however the cryptic nature of the majority of the licenses really turn me off and make it very hard for me to understand exactly what people can do with my code.