JQuery Mobile 1.0.1 Released(jquerymobile.com)

52 pointsby micheljansen15 anni fa13 comments

http://jquerymobile.com/blog/2012/01/26/jquery-mobile-1-0-1-released/

4 comments

untog15 anni fa

I'm using jQuery Mobile in an app I'm making and I mostly like it. But there's a delay in switching between pages that I just can't track down- all of my pages are local so it's not an AJAX issue. I'm poking through the source code to try and track down the source of the problem, but unless I can find a fix it's going to be the dealbreaker that makes me switch to something else.

A shame, because other than this slowness it's a great platform.

fiznool15 anni fa

What you are experiencing might be down to the browser waiting for a double tap when you tap on links and buttons. Google produced an article on implementing fast buttons which describes this phenomenon: http://code.google.com/mobile/articles/fast_buttons.html

From the article:

' ... mobile browsers will wait approximately 300ms from the time that you tap the button to fire the click event. The reason for this is that the browser is waiting to see if you are actually performing a double tap. For most buttons we are developing we know that there is no double click behavior that we want to handle, so waiting this long to start acting on the click is time wasted for users. '

The article goes on to discuss how to mitigate against this problem. jQuery Mobile's solution is to use virtual events to listen for touch events rather than mouse clicks. Try listening for vmouseup instead of vclick, this could solve the issue. See http://jquerymobile.com/demos/1.0.1/docs/pages/page-scriptin... for more details.

[deleted]15 anni fa

untog15 anni fa

It isn't that- I've looked into it myself.

The delay seems to occur somewhere between the pagebeforeshow and pageshow events- so by that point the click action is definitely already registered. But there must be some function call that slows the whole thing down, interestingly, it doesn't on the iPhone simulator, so presumably it's relatively CPU intensive.

speg15 anni fa

Glad to hear I'm not the only one. I was stoked to see 1.0 was out, but after doing just the simple quick start I was disappointed with the lag between popups/transitions.

Let me know if you find a fix!

monsterix15 anni fa

I second that @speg. My disappointment went beyond slow transitions though.

One instance, for example, was in having "fixed" header/footer on the web-app. The rendition of fixed elements would fade-out and fade-in again once user stopped scrolling. This really felt naive and I decided to do that part myself instead.

Obviously, now the situation has improved that we have property 'fixed' acknowledged on the iPad Safari. Will give 1.1 a look again, thanks to this heads-up!

untog15 anni fa

I was surprised by the lack of fixed headers/footers, too. They say it's coming, but in the mean time you can use iScroll without any side-effects:

http://cubiq.org/iscroll-4

And, as you say, use the 'fixed' CSS in newer Safari versions that support it.

monsterix15 anni fa

Well, they say it's done by taking "advantage of native scrolling":

http://jquerymobile.com/test/docs/toolbars/bars-fixed.html

And there obviously is improvement over the previous version, in that, earlier there was some flickering of fixed elements on desktop view-port.

I stand corrected, and appreciate the effort jQuery team.

someguy23514 anni fa

I had a similar problem. I know you said that this isn't an AJAX issue, but have you tried using data-ajax="false" in your <a> tags? jQuery mobile uses AJAX for page loads, even on local pages, in order to implement transition effects.

http://jquerymobile.com/demos/1.0.1/docs/pages/page-links.ht...

yesimahuman15 anni fa

Cograts Todd and team! Looks like some solid improvements in this release.

I am the co-founder of Codiqa (http://codiqa.com), and we are building tools and services to make jQuery Mobile development easier and faster. We are really excited about the project and hope we can help contribute to its success.

zalew15 anni fa

your landing page looks very promissing, just what I wish I could use right now. signed up for beta, good luck with launching soon!

sheppard15 anni fa

I used JQuery Mobile for the mobile version of our site. Performance is definitely an issue. I believe that it will eventually improve with future versions so I stuck with it and used just a subset of the features that had acceptable performance. The compromise in performance was worth not having to worry about cross-device compatibility.

Specific performance issues I ran into: 1) The page transitions were too slow so I didn't use them at all and instead just do page reloads for everything. https://github.com/jquery/jquery-mobile/issues/3217

2) The list structure causes scrolling to be too slow so I had to switch to generating the CSS classes and html structures on the server: https://github.com/jquery/jquery-mobile/issues/2855

Shalanga15 anni fa

Is just me or they take too much time to release new versions? For me it compromise my development.

brunnsbe15 anni fa

i have done some testing for jQuery Mobile and the problem is that the amount of devices is huge compared to desktop browsers. E.g. someone makes a change to a CSS file to change something simple, but it still has to be tested on all different platforms and devices. Still v1.1 looks promising.