Occupy protesters “branded” with UV ink(salon.com)

8 pointsby nextparadigms15 anni fa3 comments

http://www.salon.com/2011/11/30/occupy_protesters_branded_with_uv_ink/

2 comments

This is pretty bad. It's hard to tell as the protestor was unable to witness the actual act but it sounds as if was applied with a tool designed to allow the ink to permeate the skin rather than sit atop.

It's a pretty vile act to carry out on someone against their will.

dkokelley15 anni fa

I'm sorry, but there really is not much substance here, IMHO. A protester was marked with UV ink after being arrested. The article is literally 4 paragraphs about it, with most of it being the protester retelling the harrowing story of being "violated" by the ink. Maybe there is a significant civil rights violation in place here. I don't know. What I do know is that I didn't get much value from clicking the link, and I doubt many others here will.

seb_z_lite15 anni fa

no, no substance. People are getting branded like cows but we'd rather read about the same ruby vs. python stories. That is substance!