Patent Troll Threatens Twitter(techcrunch.com)
techcrunch.com
Patent Troll Threatens Twitter
http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/03/twirpy-patent-troll-threatens-twitter/
8 comments
A business in Russia has a somewhat fixed number of people threatening it. And if it is able to make deals with them, it can function, sort of. Whereas there is no limit to the number of patent trolls that can threaten a software business, and no limit on how much they can demand or how much havoc they can wreak.
A fixed number of people with a limit on what they can demand? Where do you get this from? Either way, it is still different in the sense that in Russia you'll get threatened with guns and not lawsuits.
Well, you know, I do not live in Russia, so perhaps you can correct me. But here in North America, the kind of people who threaten people with guns for protection have territories and do not take kindly to random people threatening their "customers." So there is a limit of sorts on how many people with guns you have to deal with.
Similar to Sicilian culture in the 1900s, still in place (somewhat) today.
Maybe Twitter can convince Google to sue Kootol for infringing on their logo.
http://www.kootol.com/Images/Kootol_Logo.png
http://www.kootol.com/Images/Kootol_Logo.png
I thought that calling patent infringement based on a patent you applied for is illegal. I thought you have to have been awarded the actual patent.
My understanding of patent laws is near non-existant, though. I wouldn't be surprised if I was wrong.
My understanding of patent laws is near non-existant, though. I wouldn't be surprised if I was wrong.
I believe you are correct. Moreover, since every rails tutorial know to man builds a twitter/microblogging/messaging clone, odds are likely that this will not be awarded simply because the application's technology is obvious at this point.
I may be too optimistic though.
I may be too optimistic though.
That hasn't stopped blatantly obvious patents to be filed. You are being extremely optimistic. USPTO will issue a patent nearly for any software related invention even with prior art.
I'm not an expert either, but one thing to keep in mind is that they're not calling patent infringement just yet, they're just subtly pointing out it might be.
The article doesn't mention this, but their patent application actually has already been allowed. It's just a matter of waiting for the USPTO to issue it.
Why am I not suprised. I know you're not supposed to judge patents just by their title but this one is about as broad as it gets. There should be a penalty for making broad claims like that. And anyone should be able to challenge a patent by providing the prior art to the USPTO and have it review within a short (6 months max) period of time. For a fee of about 10 bucks ;p No courts needed here.
This comment makes no sense to me. "I know you're not supposed to do this, BUT I'M GOING TO DO IT ANYWAY BECAUSE FUCK PATENTS." The title of a patent is irrelevant to what it covers. Read the claims.
How annoying are all these people just acting on grey areas in patents?? How are new start ups meant to thrive in this market when every two minutes someone is being sued for not having the appropriate license??
Have these people nothing better to do with their time? And moreover, who is allowing these stupid patents through that are so vague and apply to so many different sites?
I my opinion, if you file for a patent and don't use it in x amount of time then it should be revoked and allow someone else to use it. I don't know if this is already the case but all these patent trolls are doing my head in, GET A PROPER JOB!
Have these people nothing better to do with their time? And moreover, who is allowing these stupid patents through that are so vague and apply to so many different sites?
I my opinion, if you file for a patent and don't use it in x amount of time then it should be revoked and allow someone else to use it. I don't know if this is already the case but all these patent trolls are doing my head in, GET A PROPER JOB!
And moreover, who is allowing these stupid patents through that are so vague and apply to so many different sites?
The USPTO has fixed resources, and the number of patent applications has been growing exponentially for years. Also, if they grant a patent the person filing goes away, but if they deny it the filer will just come back with amendments or appeals again and again and again.
If we gave the USPTO more money or, heck, even let it keep all the money it collected in fees the problem wouldn't be nearly as bad.
The USPTO has fixed resources, and the number of patent applications has been growing exponentially for years. Also, if they grant a patent the person filing goes away, but if they deny it the filer will just come back with amendments or appeals again and again and again.
If we gave the USPTO more money or, heck, even let it keep all the money it collected in fees the problem wouldn't be nearly as bad.
The real fix is to change patent law so that it's not broken. The USPTO is now trying to solve the wrong problem.
Sounds like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sopranos
But, this is just a letter.
And in that sense, Kooltol has trolled TC. who in turn has trolled us.
And in that sense, Kooltol has trolled TC. who in turn has trolled us.
Twitter knew they would be sued for stealing other's ideas, I guess it has come to pass.
As it turns out, we have this in the US also.