Glenn Greenwald: Big Tech is censoring Covid debate(youtube.com)
youtube.com
Glenn Greenwald: Big Tech is censoring Covid debate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSVNm7XbnYA
3 comments
May someone explain what they are actually "censoring"?
For example, useful debate around hydroxychloroquine. The studies continue proving that it is an effective treatment https://c19rmd.com/ and even the American Medical Association is considering changing their posture around it.
Sadly, the drug has been highly politicized and all positive discussion around it was banned from YouTube. The OAN channel in YT was banned for talking about it: https://uk.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-youtube/yo...
There are many other instances of YouTube censoring discussion that results in a harmful effect to society. For example, most popular channels posting riot videos were demonetized.
Sadly, the drug has been highly politicized and all positive discussion around it was banned from YouTube. The OAN channel in YT was banned for talking about it: https://uk.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-youtube/yo...
There are many other instances of YouTube censoring discussion that results in a harmful effect to society. For example, most popular channels posting riot videos were demonetized.
Essentially anything that deviates from WHO guidelines, that is to say conventional wisdom and orthodoxy...
It's not "censorship" because it's private property, right?
It's not a First Amendment issue, and it's not state censorship, but it is censorship.
Edit: This quote though seems to be wrong: What competency do tech giants have to arbitrate over science and health policy? … How did they get into a position of some sort of philosopher-king to be able to sit in judgement as overlords of our discourse So yeah, clearly each platform has control over what is acceptable to say on the platform. Encouraging free speech is important, but that takes work. Rule with an iron fist is the default for any platform, even blog comments.
Edit: This quote though seems to be wrong: What competency do tech giants have to arbitrate over science and health policy? … How did they get into a position of some sort of philosopher-king to be able to sit in judgement as overlords of our discourse So yeah, clearly each platform has control over what is acceptable to say on the platform. Encouraging free speech is important, but that takes work. Rule with an iron fist is the default for any platform, even blog comments.
Defining the suppression of discussion on COVID as acts of censorship has nothing to do with the private nature of the platforms. It is legal, but it is still censorship.
Or they can be conduits and avoid this risk entirely.