Wikipedia Age Challenges Scholars’ Sacred Peer Review(nytimes.com)
nytimes.com
Wikipedia Age Challenges Scholars’ Sacred Peer Review
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/arts/24peer.html?pagewanted=all
1 comments
Speaking as both a reviewer and victim of peer review, having only 3-4 reviews for a paper seems to introduce a significant element of luck, so getting more reviews sounds like a good idea. Also, making submissions public can help locate reviewers with very specific expertise (although those people are often competitors).