What different sorting algorithms sound like(youtube.com)
youtube.com
What different sorting algorithms sound like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8g-iYGHpEA
39 comments
No. Under some simple guidelines, which the model follows, the sorting algorithms won't sound like just about anything.
If you sort random permutations of the values [1, n], and map some monotonic property to the values, then not only are there provably some sounds which certain algorithms make that others don't, but more generally there are 'average case' signatures for each algorithm that give them their own recognizable cadences, and that is exactly what this video is demonstrating.
That you can use a 'boop' or a 'beep' or 'buzz' or invert the monotonicity is obvious and irrelevant.
If you sort random permutations of the values [1, n], and map some monotonic property to the values, then not only are there provably some sounds which certain algorithms make that others don't, but more generally there are 'average case' signatures for each algorithm that give them their own recognizable cadences, and that is exactly what this video is demonstrating.
That you can use a 'boop' or a 'beep' or 'buzz' or invert the monotonicity is obvious and irrelevant.
I thought the values to be sorted would be the amplitude of the sound wave, and the value currently touched by the algorithm would be played in each step.
Of course you could still pick arbitrary values and arbitrary start orderings.
Of course you could still pick arbitrary values and arbitrary start orderings.
This makes me want to sort something. The loose change strewn all over my desk. The contents of my fridge. The words on this page. Anything.
Awesome link.
It reminds me of a website showing a matrix with visualizations of several sorting algorithms: http://www.sorting-algorithms.com/ (which was posted somewhere here iirc).
where is quicksort?
Too fast to hear.
But nice to look at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxENKlcs2Tw&feature=relat...
But nice to look at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxENKlcs2Tw&feature=relat...
Bullshit on the too fast. Mergesort never needs more comparisons than quicksort, and mergesort was featured.
Merge sort may use an optimal number of comparisons, but that doesn't stop it from being slower than quicksort in most cases in real life.
Errm. Yes. I know that. It was a joke...
I've noticed that we don't share the same sense of humour.
Generally speaking, I've seen too many people assert that quicksort is blazingly fast to believe all of them were joking. It doesn't particularly help that the major sorting algorithms are severely fragmented, because people optimize variously for stability, time, space, comparisons, swaps, cache locality, parallelizability, best case, worst case, average case, amortized average case, arrays, lists, integers, objects...
Generally speaking, I've seen too many people assert that quicksort is blazingly fast to believe all of them were joking. It doesn't particularly help that the major sorting algorithms are severely fragmented, because people optimize variously for stability, time, space, comparisons, swaps, cache locality, parallelizability, best case, worst case, average case, amortized average case, arrays, lists, integers, objects...
quicksort has very bad performance on the wrong data.
But on the kind of data that the test showed it would perform more or less on par with merge sort. To suggest that quick sort would be that much faster than merge sort that you couldn't hear it when there are obviously quite a few steps is to me more than enough reason to assume a joke rather than a serious answer.
Anyway, humour is a hard thing to get across online, I should have added a ;) at a minimum apologies for that, also HN seems to frown on humor (even though every now and then there are some really good jokes here http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1597571 ) this one was reasonably lame but the subject wasn't all that serious to begin with.
Sorting is enough of an issue that Knuth devoted the better part of a very thick book to it and to this day there are plenty of people that think that 'one size fits all'.
The more you know about your data the faster you can sort it.
But on the kind of data that the test showed it would perform more or less on par with merge sort. To suggest that quick sort would be that much faster than merge sort that you couldn't hear it when there are obviously quite a few steps is to me more than enough reason to assume a joke rather than a serious answer.
Anyway, humour is a hard thing to get across online, I should have added a ;) at a minimum apologies for that, also HN seems to frown on humor (even though every now and then there are some really good jokes here http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1597571 ) this one was reasonably lame but the subject wasn't all that serious to begin with.
Sorting is enough of an issue that Knuth devoted the better part of a very thick book to it and to this day there are plenty of people that think that 'one size fits all'.
The more you know about your data the faster you can sort it.
Interesting, but not new. Mark Brown did this two decades ago at DEC SRC (and probably others before him). http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/Compaq-DEC/SRC-RR-76A.html
i know the choice of sounds was arbitrary, but it nonetheless reminded me of the seal calls of 'encounters at the end of the world': http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SORza1fqQGk
That was super cool! I really enjoyed how my brain started matching the sound and the bar heights in such a way that by the end I said "of course that one sounds like that".
See another experiment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5ml9e2THw
It sonifies the following algorithms (from http://www.algolist.net/Algorithms/ ) - Bubble sort - Selection sort - Insertion sort - Quicksort
You can also see their sonograms.
It sonifies the following algorithms (from http://www.algolist.net/Algorithms/ ) - Bubble sort - Selection sort - Insertion sort - Quicksort
You can also see their sonograms.
What, no quick sort? And no heap sort?
There was a link to the heapsort at the end: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXAjiDQbPSw
That is by far the coolest sounding of the bunch.
I think Mathematica can be used to make "audiolizations" really easily. They include one of the Riemman Zeta function as a demo. It sounds really cool (sorry I can't find a link, I'll try upload it)
That was really cool. Is the speed indicative of the speed of the sort?
I would say it's likely. There are all sorts (pun intended) of optimizations you can do for each algorithm, but at the textbook level, I could say they seemed typical as far as speed expectancy goes. My rough estimates for the times were (in seconds): insert: ~10, bubble: ~27, selection: ~18, merge: ~17, and gnome: ~19. I have only written inserts, bubbles, and selections; with bubble being slowest and insert being the fastest, my limited experience agrees with the video. Note: the merge algorithm appeared to have sorted a different data set.
Given that the width of the elements being sorted changes (therefore there are more/less elements in different visualisations), I'd say no.
I'm not sure, but the visual part of the videos looks a lot like visualizations I've seen in algorithms classes where the speed does represent the speed of the sort. So I'd guess that it does here as well.
These are really great. As a musical person it engrained these concepts that much deeper for me. My wife, who is not much of a computer science person like the merge sort the best.
These are really great. As a musical person it engrained these concepts that much deeper for me. My wife, who is not much of a computer science person like the merge sort the best.
Here is a live version of the sounds of various sorting algorithms. Done using HTML 5 audio - http://bit.ly/sort-sound
It would be interesting to listen to graph algorithms.
Why does the bubble sort continue to the end of the array on every pass, when it could stop one earlier each time?
There's a lot of effort been put in to this, I like it.
I love that you can hear the bubbling in bubble sort :D
I love that you can hear the bubbling in bubble sort :D
I noticed that too! Good stuff.
Merge sort's sound is actually recursive.
At times this sounds a lot like an old Williams shoot'em-up arcade game, like Defender for example.
Cool job! Gnome Sort - now that's new to me!
bubble sort sounds like someone chanting "DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS!" !!!! :D
This is just a simple example of data sonification, albeit with some nice visualisation too, and a subject matter which appeals to the computer scientists in the room.