Slackware 13.1 Released(slackware.com)
slackware.com
Slackware 13.1 Released
http://slackware.com/announce/13.1.php
6 comments
That's pretty amazing, since it was first released in 1993.
Seriously? I traveled a lot on business in 1991, and I thought that I had an HP laptop loaded up with Slackware. That said, I just googled Slackware and version 1.0 was officially released in 1993, as you said.
I guess that I have not been using Linux for as long as I thought. Thanks for the correction.
I guess that I have not been using Linux for as long as I thought. Thanks for the correction.
Too bad it was released just too late to integrate the latest update to Xfce in months (4.6.2).
This was the distro that I used for 6 years with the same install, every upgrade was seamless, I never had the same trouble-free experience with another distro.
I have a not so computer literate family member who wants to see what this whole linux thing is about but don't know whether to suggest Ubuntu or Slackware? Thoughts or suggestions?
Ubuntu is the best choice for a user who is not terribly computer literate. The Ubuntu devs have made an extensive effort to provide a cohesive and well-integrated system that should not require the user to drop down to the command line for most uses. No other distro has made as exhaustive an effort to insulate the user from Linux's rough edges; Ubuntu's popularity ensures that numerous online tutorials are available to assist in just about any task.
As with any operating system, installation is the biggest hurdle, particularly if the user needs to preserve existing data. Once past that point, however, if he can handle Windows or OS X, he should have no trouble using and maintaining Ubuntu.
As with any operating system, installation is the biggest hurdle, particularly if the user needs to preserve existing data. Once past that point, however, if he can handle Windows or OS X, he should have no trouble using and maintaining Ubuntu.
Well, somebody has to go the other way. If you haven't looked at Slackware lately, give it a shot. The advances in the kernel and KDE and XFCE make it a really nice environment now. Yes, it still has an ncurses installer, and yes, it still boots (at least the first time) to a command prompt. But the installer really is easy, and it takes changing one number in one file to boot to a log-in screen.
Once you're in your desktop environment, the biggest difference you'll see is that Slackware is more responsive and more stable. KDE 4.4 in particular has the non-technical user covered. XFCE is easy too, but you might want to add some packages (which Robby Workman always seems to compile and have available on his site). Oh, and you should install WICD from the extra folder on the DVD if you use wireless.
Slackware also has slackpkg in by default now. You have to do it at the command line, but it updates the official packages with two simple commands.
Updating to a new release is still not as easy as a lot of other distros, but that's one of the bullets that most probably should bite and reinstall from scratch once a year or so. And if you don't want to I'm sure a Slackware install will continue working at least as long as the Ubuntu LTS version.
The thing is, Slackware still gives you vanilla packages, but the advances throughout the system have made vanilla a whole lot richer.
Once you're in your desktop environment, the biggest difference you'll see is that Slackware is more responsive and more stable. KDE 4.4 in particular has the non-technical user covered. XFCE is easy too, but you might want to add some packages (which Robby Workman always seems to compile and have available on his site). Oh, and you should install WICD from the extra folder on the DVD if you use wireless.
Slackware also has slackpkg in by default now. You have to do it at the command line, but it updates the official packages with two simple commands.
Updating to a new release is still not as easy as a lot of other distros, but that's one of the bullets that most probably should bite and reinstall from scratch once a year or so. And if you don't want to I'm sure a Slackware install will continue working at least as long as the Ubuntu LTS version.
The thing is, Slackware still gives you vanilla packages, but the advances throughout the system have made vanilla a whole lot richer.
For not so computer literates I always would recommend Ubuntu or something like that, the only problem that they will have (at least I always have) is to upgrade to newer versions, for someone that is not a übergeek this is a nonissue and a LTS release will be just fine for some time.
[deleted]
Slackware was also my first Linux distro. I have always liked it for its beautiful simplicity and getting out of your way.
When I first saw a SuSE install I felt pretty overwhelmed and overloaded by all those ridiculous choices, checkboxes and dialogues. Plus the multitude of wizards and tools for making tasks "easier" were just an abomination and very often did not work.
And I always hated RedHat's automatic update tool which would read update information from a central server but search for the RPMs on a different mirror then - because very often those mirrors were not in sync.
Here is to you, Patrick!
When I first saw a SuSE install I felt pretty overwhelmed and overloaded by all those ridiculous choices, checkboxes and dialogues. Plus the multitude of wizards and tools for making tasks "easier" were just an abomination and very often did not work.
And I always hated RedHat's automatic update tool which would read update information from a central server but search for the RPMs on a different mirror then - because very often those mirrors were not in sync.
Here is to you, Patrick!
Slackware was my first distro: downloaded over a 2400 baud modem in 1991 (my family may never forgive me for hogging the phone line for 2 days :-)
Tip of the hat to Patrick Volkerding and crew.