PostgreSQL 9.1 will be NoSQL(archives.postgresql.org)

archives.postgresql.org

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-04/msg00003.php

8 comments

I read the whole thing so you don't have to: "It's time for us to switch to something fresher. I personally would have preferred XSLT, but QUEL is almost as good."

AndrewO16 anni fa

Ugh, April is the cruelest month for techies if only because of today.

confusedcitizen16 anni fa

Too predictable...

mikebo16 anni fa

This one actually made me smile. Probably because I just woke up and it's the first one I saw.

ryanisinallofus16 anni fa

April hates developers

mos116 anni fa

I hate April 1st. [shakes fist]

pohl16 anni fa

Would it be appropriate to flag such articles? We might be able to clean them off the front page effectively if so.

JunkDNA16 anni fa

I think the most appropriate thing is to just mark as [April Fools].

hackermom16 anni fa

Joke all you want - this just may be the kind of turn one or other DB actor on the market will take.

ergo9816 anni fa

What sort of turn is that? Their joke talked about replacing SQL with a syntactic variant. Do you mean other elements of the lauded NoSQL? Guess what : We've had them for time eternal. SQL Server replication allows you to decouple from CAP. Lots of RDBMS solutions are shared nothing.

wendroid16 anni fa

How about NoSQL to SQL : http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/berkeley-db/sql.ht...

wildmXranat16 anni fa

I like it. When is 9.1 coming out ?