Python Packages for Social Scientists(drewconway.com)
drewconway.com
Python Packages for Social Scientists
http://www.drewconway.com/zia/?p=204
8 comments
I wonder how large the proportion of social scientists is who actually know that Python is a programming language.
(I am a social scientist myself).
In my own experience, it is already pretty hard to teach them R.
In my own experience, it is already pretty hard to teach them R.
Many of the students and academics from the older engineering fields (e.g. mechanical, chemical) don't know of python either. When I tell them (python + numpy + scipy + matplotlib) is as potent as MatLAB for most situations, and far more flexible and generalizable later, most don't believe me. They get started faster with MatLAB, then struggle later with its constraints, and end up creating overly-specialized, one-off tools that few others can use.
Ideally, science/engineering schooling (college and up) should not allow anyone to graduate without knowledge of at least one general purpose programming language. But in the meanwhile, those who can program while working in another field - whether sociology or environmental engineering - have an enormous advantage.
Ideally, science/engineering schooling (college and up) should not allow anyone to graduate without knowledge of at least one general purpose programming language. But in the meanwhile, those who can program while working in another field - whether sociology or environmental engineering - have an enormous advantage.
I know exactly what you are talking about. When I first started my coursework in Machine Learning, I was given the freedom to use any programming language. But I simply defaulted to MatLAB because the rest of the CS department used it. I would have loved to do all my work in Python--and infact I tried to with NumPy and SciPy-- but it was just too hard to resist the comfortable environment MatLAB creates. So now I'm stuck porting over all my old code, which to be quite honest, is a good exercise in itself.
I wish I could mod your comment up more.
Programming is becoming an essential tool for scientists and engineers and it isn't taught it enough. Interestingly my mother was taught Pascal back in the day when she went back to Uni to study Environmental Science as an undergrad, looking back on it I am most impressed.
Programming is becoming an essential tool for scientists and engineers and it isn't taught it enough. Interestingly my mother was taught Pascal back in the day when she went back to Uni to study Environmental Science as an undergrad, looking back on it I am most impressed.
[deleted]
For agent-based models -- what the author seems to enjoy -- also see http://cs.gmu.edu/~eclab/projects/mason/
I would like to recommend my own project, GarlicSim: http://garlicsim.org
It is a Pythonic framework for simulations. It's still in alpha, and I'd be happy to help people start using it in research.
It is a Pythonic framework for simulations. It's still in alpha, and I'd be happy to help people start using it in research.
Glad this list still resonates with researchers.
I have added an addendum to the bottom of the list promoting the Enthought distribution (http://www.enthought.com/) of Python, which includes most (maybe all) of these packages in a single distribution.
I have added an addendum to the bottom of the list promoting the Enthought distribution (http://www.enthought.com/) of Python, which includes most (maybe all) of these packages in a single distribution.
I would add Scrapy (http://scrapy.org/) for web crawling.
Wow I've never heard of NetworkX. Are there any other good python packages for graph theory?
The big three are networkx, igrpah, and python-graph. Each has it's advantages and disadvantages, so test each one a bit if you are doing serious graph work in python. For toy/casual problems I would recommend python-graph or networkx.
There is also igraph, for Python, R, Ruby, and C.
http://igraph.sourceforge.net/
http://igraph.sourceforge.net/
This seems to be a good list for anyone using Python in their research, not just social scientists.
I used numpy for all my numerical analysis homework. The professor always lauded me for having the most concise code in the class.
I used numpy for all my numerical analysis homework. The professor always lauded me for having the most concise code in the class.
simplejson is included in the standard library as json now. Yes, cjson is faster, but it's also more fragile and, well, less standardized. Everything but simplejson is effectively dead: simplejson won the json library wars.
html5lib is an odd choice for a new HTML parsing kit. lxml.html offers its own fast and good HTML parser, and can also use html5lib or BeautifulSoup as its backend while still producing an Element tree with plenty of convenience methods (like xpath). I am not sure why html5lib would be better here (maybe it's not as complicated, somehow?)
As for MySQLdb, that thing is awful. There are some replacements out there, and out of them my personal preference is for oursql. The creator/maintainer is a regular (an op, actually) on the #python IRC channel, so it's easy to get support, and it fixes a lot of the nasty quirks of MySQLdb.
His first four suggested libraries are definitely good, though
http://docs.python.org/library/json.html http://simplejson.googlecode.com/svn/tags/simplejson-2.1.0/d...
http://codespeak.net/lxml/lxmlhtml.html http://codespeak.net/lxml/elementsoup.html http://codespeak.net/lxml/html5parser.html
https://launchpad.net/oursql
EDIT: checked the date, the article is from 2008. I guess that explains things. :)