Is experience better than talent?(nickhalstead.com)
nickhalstead.com
Is experience better than talent?
http://www.nickhalstead.com/2008/01/16/is-experience-better-than-talent/
3 comments
talent = passion X dedication
I don't even know where to fit experience in that formula... As Joel Spolsky (I think) said, beyond 6 months experience in a language it doesn't matter much anymore.
I don't even know where to fit experience in that formula... As Joel Spolsky (I think) said, beyond 6 months experience in a language it doesn't matter much anymore.
There are a lot of useless, passionate, dedicated people running around (misguided != talented). I prefer to avoid them.
We must have very different definitions of "useless", "passionate" and "dedicated".
Here are mine:
Useless: Inconsequential, meaningless, that has no useful result.
Passionate: Derives genuine happiness and a feeling of fulfilment when doing some particular thing.
Dedicated: Demonstrates perseverence and involvement in a nontrivial task, spanning a nontrivial amount of time.
Per those definitions, I don't see how someone can possibly be simultaneously useless, passionate and dedicated.
Here are mine:
Useless: Inconsequential, meaningless, that has no useful result.
Passionate: Derives genuine happiness and a feeling of fulfilment when doing some particular thing.
Dedicated: Demonstrates perseverence and involvement in a nontrivial task, spanning a nontrivial amount of time.
Per those definitions, I don't see how someone can possibly be simultaneously useless, passionate and dedicated.
One could split hairs here indefinitely, especially debating the nature of what being useful means and to whom.
"Anyone who’s says that they can keep up the same levels at 50 as they were at 20 is lying."
Wrong!
This same stupid remark finds it way onto this board about once a month or so, and I generally give this response:
We are NOT basketball players. We do not "lose it" after 30. In fact, the best of us get BETTER with age. Live a clean life and you should be just as good a hacker at 80 as at 20.
OP is asking the wrong question. A better question might be, "What happens when someone talented amasses more experience?" I'll tell you what. They learn to better leverage their talent and produce MORE. They don't repeat stupid mistakes (they make new stupid mistakes). They know themselves better and can better anticipate what to expect from themselves, others, and situations. They learn to love what they love even more.
Oh, what's the use. You won't believe me until you're 50. I just hope you stay far enough away from drugs, junk food, and stupid excesses so that you can experience what I already know for yourself. It'll be great!
Wrong!
This same stupid remark finds it way onto this board about once a month or so, and I generally give this response:
We are NOT basketball players. We do not "lose it" after 30. In fact, the best of us get BETTER with age. Live a clean life and you should be just as good a hacker at 80 as at 20.
OP is asking the wrong question. A better question might be, "What happens when someone talented amasses more experience?" I'll tell you what. They learn to better leverage their talent and produce MORE. They don't repeat stupid mistakes (they make new stupid mistakes). They know themselves better and can better anticipate what to expect from themselves, others, and situations. They learn to love what they love even more.
Oh, what's the use. You won't believe me until you're 50. I just hope you stay far enough away from drugs, junk food, and stupid excesses so that you can experience what I already know for yourself. It'll be great!
Research into the workings of the brain has actually been pointing the other way: people who are described as "talented" in a particular area have put tremendous effort into becoming so -- that is to say, they have experience.