Life with My Robot Secretary(fastcodesign.com)
fastcodesign.com
Life with My Robot Secretary
http://www.fastcodesign.com/3052646/innovation-by-design/life-with-my-robot-secretary
33 comments
Meekan is the only one of these that's 100% AI with no human operators (and it's free)
http://meekan.com/slack
Include a disclaimer about you being the co-founder of meekan.com
So lemme get this straight: it's okay for someone to post this advertisement-disguised-as-an-article about a YC-backed company's product that doesn't even do what it claims to do (the "article" reveals at the end that there are an "unspecified" number of human beings actually doing things behind the scenes in Clara), but not for someone to post about a competing product that actually does live up to the over-hyped "AI" claims?
Unless noted, I assume posts come from companies and comments from individuals. This has large impacts in trustworthiness and skepticism level.
I believe my position is common, and why undisclosed company comments are frowned upon.
I believe my position is common, and why undisclosed company comments are frowned upon.
I never said the post was OK either. I'm not a grammar nazi analyzing these things 24x7.
This site is YC-backed. So, yes. (Snark aside, I agree that a disclaimer would be nice.)
All the details are in my profile, but true, I should mention that I'm a co-founder at Meekan
This looks awesome. I use reminders in Inbox with reckless abandon, love them. Please tell me there is an open source version of this or that I am missing something in gmail to do this. Pretty please.
That said: There is no way I am spending $49 a month on this. There is a point where you have to analyze how many $5/$10/$15 dollar a month subscriptions you have. Pretty soon it can escalate to the cost of a monthly vehicle payment or the hiring of a part-time employee. Furthermore, can get a human to do this for $10 an hour or so using a virtual assistant?
If I was super-crazy-busy and making ridiculous $$$, sure. But as a cash flow restricted mortal with a mortgage a full time job and a side project... $49 in addition to the myriad of services/equipment I require (accounting, marketing, materials, equipment maintenance, etc) is not going to happen.
That said: There is no way I am spending $49 a month on this. There is a point where you have to analyze how many $5/$10/$15 dollar a month subscriptions you have. Pretty soon it can escalate to the cost of a monthly vehicle payment or the hiring of a part-time employee. Furthermore, can get a human to do this for $10 an hour or so using a virtual assistant?
If I was super-crazy-busy and making ridiculous $$$, sure. But as a cash flow restricted mortal with a mortgage a full time job and a side project... $49 in addition to the myriad of services/equipment I require (accounting, marketing, materials, equipment maintenance, etc) is not going to happen.
An intelligent assistant is fantastically useful. I sometimes pay $50/month (depending on how much work she does) and she is worth every penny.
E.g., "Deepika, call up brokers and schedule me apartment viewings in $X location for $Y or less, schedule these appointments on monday evening back to back. Do the same for $Z location on tuesday evening."
Of course, Deepika (name changed a little) is actually a real girl; I can only afford her because her choice of birth country allows me to pay less than US minimum wage.
In my experience these robot assistance are not as smart as Deepika. Scheduling in particular is a use case designed to make the user feel important rather than actually save people time. Doodle ( http://doodle.com/ ) substitutes UI for AI, but it works brilliantly. Every email bot I've been the victim of just fobs work off from the user to their counterparty.
E.g., "Deepika, call up brokers and schedule me apartment viewings in $X location for $Y or less, schedule these appointments on monday evening back to back. Do the same for $Z location on tuesday evening."
Of course, Deepika (name changed a little) is actually a real girl; I can only afford her because her choice of birth country allows me to pay less than US minimum wage.
In my experience these robot assistance are not as smart as Deepika. Scheduling in particular is a use case designed to make the user feel important rather than actually save people time. Doodle ( http://doodle.com/ ) substitutes UI for AI, but it works brilliantly. Every email bot I've been the victim of just fobs work off from the user to their counterparty.
I can't tell if "her choice of birth country" is supposed to be ironic, sarcastic, or some other sly form of commentary...
I presume (hope!) Deepika is a "real woman", and not a "real girl". I'm not trying to scold, but it's worth pointing out that most men wouldn't want to be described as "boys", and the culture that makes it so easy to inadvertently describe ourselves as men and girls rather than men and women has something to do with why we have so few women in computing.
We use the same terminology in many fields with lots of women, so I doubt your hypothesis is true.
If you image search "im a real boy" you'll also understand the reference I was making.
If you image search "im a real boy" you'll also understand the reference I was making.
How did you find Deepika?
I'm not the OP -- the term to google is VA, virtual assistant. It is, currently, something of a boom industry. One of my friends does it: marywuva.com
She's a former coworker. Sometimes I live in India.
Exactly what I was thinking. If you read the end of TFA you'll see that the main benefit here is that they provide a human force to curate it, etc. That means that even if they open sourced it today it won't do you and me any good without the human element. Then again, if there is an OSS version of this that someone knows of, please do point it out.
Having said that the price is too high for me personally. I'd consider $5/month. Also since I schedule way fewer meetings than the author of TFA, I would need longer than a month to try it out.
Having said that the price is too high for me personally. I'd consider $5/month. Also since I schedule way fewer meetings than the author of TFA, I would need longer than a month to try it out.
> There is no way I am spending $49 a month on this.
You're not the target market then. For that matter, neither am I. The target market is people who need an admin assistant, but can't pay the five figures per year yet.
You're not the target market then. For that matter, neither am I. The target market is people who need an admin assistant, but can't pay the five figures per year yet.
I see your point.
However, the price is still steep considering what leading virtual assistant service companies charge. The bonus with a virtual assistant is the "on demand" aspect. Its not a fixed cost per month, every month. When I am really busy, I use it more and consequently pay more and vice versa for when times are slow...
However, the price is still steep considering what leading virtual assistant service companies charge. The bonus with a virtual assistant is the "on demand" aspect. Its not a fixed cost per month, every month. When I am really busy, I use it more and consequently pay more and vice versa for when times are slow...
I'd wager the largest market for this service is b2b companies of all sizes. Hand this to the entire sales team. Sit back and watch the money roll in.
Or pay for VA's that can do a LOT more for close to the same price?
Well there's x.ai as documented here https://medium.com/backchannel/meet-amy-your-personal-ai-ass.... It's even using the same reference to Her in the title graphic.
There's also https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/cubic-your-personal-ai-wi....
And finally there's Facebook M.
There's also https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/cubic-your-personal-ai-wi....
And finally there's Facebook M.
> My plan was a free trial that would run $50/mo.
My first thought was "ow", but thinking about it more, that's not a bad price point to filter out people who think "oh, that's neat" rather than "oh, thank God, I really need something like that".
My first thought was "ow", but thinking about it more, that's not a bad price point to filter out people who think "oh, that's neat" rather than "oh, thank God, I really need something like that".
Small nitpick, but i would lose the first GIF which has about 6 emails scrolling by in quick succession. I'm not a speed-reader, so even managing to make out the grey summaries at the top took me like 6+ iterations. That's pretty frustrating, and i only stuck at it because i'm procrastinating and should actually be doing the dishes, because i should actually be changing a light bulb, because i should actually be rinsing my yak, because i should actually be writing my thesis manuscript. In that order.
EDIT: or at least slow it down, because of course the point it's trying to make is cool and/or worth it and/or noble.
EDIT: or at least slow it down, because of course the point it's trying to make is cool and/or worth it and/or noble.
Some nice PR for Clara, congrats to the Clara team!
I observed this space for some time and came to following conclusion (from an investment perspective):
- There are tons of competitors, some of them very well funded such as x.ai
- Assuming that at some point, let's say 18-24 months the AI of all providers is near perfection, user should be able to just switch from one provider to the next where is the lock in? Maybe it's learning the user's preference and behavior?
- At the moment the AI is damn impressive but at the same time it's easy to confuse the tech; just bounce some emails back and fourth with "Hey let's meet today", "Where?", "At the Ritz, 3pm", "Ok", "hey I have to postpone, will come back to you with a new time", "no problem", "tomorrow is better, same location, same time, but let's meet directly at the restaurant"; semi-automatic systems (i think Clara is) which use human operators to do final checks might deal with such messy conversations but then it's the question about scaling again
- You can't include the bots in messenger conversations (minor)
- Having a real PA is the key to success; the better she knows you the more she will take of your shoulders. The PA very often acts as a proxy for you and sometimes it's wise to use this proxy and sometimes not—depending on the other party and their status. It's perceived as a status symbol and it sends the signal 'this person is very busy', this is in particular true in a hierarchical context like in a corporation where only higher levels have dedicated PAs. It's also common not to approach higher status people (compared to your own status) with your PA. However, having an AI PA feels just cheap, like "Hey, I am busy but I can't afford a real PA", this is the main problem, if you are really important und if you really run a successful business you NEED to have a ded PA, no AI PA will be able to do the job of a real PA; important people have two, three dozen meetings a week and just for scheduling and rescheduling you need a ded PA, less important people have so few meetings a week that they can schedule them themselves; maybe this perception will change in 10 years where AI PAs get better and better and everybody has one but the status issue still stays
Would love to know your opinion? Is this a field to invest?
I observed this space for some time and came to following conclusion (from an investment perspective):
- There are tons of competitors, some of them very well funded such as x.ai
- Assuming that at some point, let's say 18-24 months the AI of all providers is near perfection, user should be able to just switch from one provider to the next where is the lock in? Maybe it's learning the user's preference and behavior?
- At the moment the AI is damn impressive but at the same time it's easy to confuse the tech; just bounce some emails back and fourth with "Hey let's meet today", "Where?", "At the Ritz, 3pm", "Ok", "hey I have to postpone, will come back to you with a new time", "no problem", "tomorrow is better, same location, same time, but let's meet directly at the restaurant"; semi-automatic systems (i think Clara is) which use human operators to do final checks might deal with such messy conversations but then it's the question about scaling again
- You can't include the bots in messenger conversations (minor)
- Having a real PA is the key to success; the better she knows you the more she will take of your shoulders. The PA very often acts as a proxy for you and sometimes it's wise to use this proxy and sometimes not—depending on the other party and their status. It's perceived as a status symbol and it sends the signal 'this person is very busy', this is in particular true in a hierarchical context like in a corporation where only higher levels have dedicated PAs. It's also common not to approach higher status people (compared to your own status) with your PA. However, having an AI PA feels just cheap, like "Hey, I am busy but I can't afford a real PA", this is the main problem, if you are really important und if you really run a successful business you NEED to have a ded PA, no AI PA will be able to do the job of a real PA; important people have two, three dozen meetings a week and just for scheduling and rescheduling you need a ded PA, less important people have so few meetings a week that they can schedule them themselves; maybe this perception will change in 10 years where AI PAs get better and better and everybody has one but the status issue still stays
Would love to know your opinion? Is this a field to invest?
So there used to be a thing called Sandy that did the same sort of thing.
http://lifehacker.com/321644/sandys-your-personal-assistant-...
http://lifehacker.com/321644/sandys-your-personal-assistant-...
I used that! The best thing was that it was free IIRC. Also, does anyone else find it weird that all these personal assistants are created with a female persona? Just wondering if there is a broader thing here.
I think this is probably both caused by, and in order to take advantage of, personal subconscious bias. Not only do people expect assistants are going to be female, but actually notice when they're male. It's just another small facet of the huge gender inequality problem. Worth noting that you can rename clara if you pay enough and the only competitor that I know of (https://x.ai/) has male and female options.
I am bothered by this - it's a completely unnecessary reinforcement of a stereotype. I don't understand why an androgynous name (eg Alex) or a neutral name (R2D2) is not an option, if the software is not up to recognising two different appellations.
And it can create a cognitive dissonance if you allow people to modify half-assedly - eg. it annoys me that I have to ask Siri for help when I have set Siri to be an Australian male voice.
And it can create a cognitive dissonance if you allow people to modify half-assedly - eg. it annoys me that I have to ask Siri for help when I have set Siri to be an Australian male voice.
[deleted]
x.ai does offer a male persona.
Their initial email states, 'P.S. If you'd prefer a male assistant, my brother Andrew would be happy to schedule your meetings. Just CC [email protected] on your meeting requests instead of me.'
Their initial email states, 'P.S. If you'd prefer a male assistant, my brother Andrew would be happy to schedule your meetings. Just CC [email protected] on your meeting requests instead of me.'
That sound really interesting, is it English only? Can it handle tasks scheduling as well? What I mean by that is:
"Clara, find me a time to do xxx next week"
That integrated with Google inbox (the remind me later feature) would be great!
P.S: I found it kind of expensive, isn't it?
"Clara, find me a time to do xxx next week"
That integrated with Google inbox (the remind me later feature) would be great!
P.S: I found it kind of expensive, isn't it?
Sounds cool. Coordinating schedules and locations is always annoying for me and I'm super disorganized, so a robot companion would be pretty helpful.
One key to doing this is that the system must consistently respond to the user in about 200-300ms. Long delays, as with Google voice dialing, are unacceptable. That was why it was so expensive in the 1990s; the company had to provision a lot of server capacity per user. Today, it ought to be much cheaper.
$49 a month reflects what Wildfire cost in the 1990s. Today, it should cost about $2/month.
[1] https://www.wildfirevirtualassistant.com/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildfire_Communications