Browser competition doesn't matter much for interoperability, because they don't restrict what sites you can use. It's only a risk if browsers start banning sites like the app stores do.
And open source Chromium and Firefox are bulwark against that, with active fork ecosystems.
It's weird to have this tone of hating on someone for not having two homes. If he can live without occupying a giant property, good on him. Why should only rich people get allotments?
Any tax he owes can be deducted from his carbon/pollution under-footprint.
Yes. Another common example is that in languages without pointers, the lack of aliasing enables optimizations that are impossible for languages with pointers.
Also, C compilers generate efficient code by assuming undefined behavior cannot happen. (This sometimes corrupts buggy programs, because the type system can't guarantee undefined behavior isn't triggered.)
11 comments on HN so far, discussing politics and complaints about Twitter, and so far not one has responded to the content of the article, in which Twitter claims to have locked every account that posted a picture of a rape victim's family, violating its policy on doxxing.
> He described how the judges found Murray guilty of “jigsaw identification,” which refers to the “possibility that a person may piece together information from various sources to arrive at the identification of a protected witness.”
Why isn't every advertising/marketing data broker in jail for "jigsaw identification"?