Stay away, you may end up owing money. From the Retainer Agreement:
> XVI. FIRM DOES NOT GUARANTEE RESULT
> I understand that there is always a risk to litigation. If I were to lose a case, under some circumstances, I may have to pay costs and/or attorney fees to the prevailing party. I acknowledge that FIRM has made no guarantee regarding the successful termination of my case and all expressions about the relative chances of success are matters of opinion only.
> When I check in with folks still there, they mainly talk about how the time difference and distance has done nothing but add churn to the entire process
I don't buy that. Saudi Arabia and the United States, via Saudi Aramco, have figured out a solution to that long ago. Business "flows" unimpededly between the two for decades.
> wages for new hires in construction, manufacturing, food and other blue-collar sectors appear to be ebbing too, according to an analysis of millions of jobs posted on ZipRecruiter.com. Job seekers report seeing roles that once offered salaries between $175,000 and $200,000 a year ago now being advertised for tens of thousands of dollars less
You mean, I can quit software engineering and install flooring for $150,000/year!? Count me in
> From 2012 to 2022, overall dispensing of stimulants in the US increased by 57.9%.
> Stimulants dispensed among the 31-40-year-old (yo) and 71-80yo age groups more than tripled since 2012; from 2012 to 2022, prescriptions dispensed rose from 5.4 million to 17.5 million among those 31-40yo, and from 0.1 million to 0.9 million among those 71-80yo.
> From 2012 to 2021, male patients had more stimulant prescriptions dispensed than female patients. By 2022, the number of stimulants dispensed to females were slightly higher than for males. Compared to 2012, prescriptions dispensed increased by 35.6% for males and 87.5% for females.
Stimulant Prescription Trends in the United States From 2012-2022:
I thought their whole point of opening the models in the first place was to undermine OpenAI, but this seems to invalidate that. Maybe their hand was forced?
> the air traffic control system is not inherently governmental. Doing what Paul did for 30 years is not an inherently governmental activity. It's safety critical.
That's absolute nonsense, I'm wondering what angle she's playing here. If it's safety critical, such as ambulances and functioning stoplights, that's what makes it governmental.
> You can't make those kind of investments if you're a government agency, you have to pay for things up front, nor can you make the kind of incremental improvements that air traffic control needs.
You think you can protect them, but you can't. The best thing you can do is create an environment where they feel comfortable coming to you when they mess up.
Show genuine interest in their activities, and equip them to make their own decisions when using the internet.