This doesn't surprise me, i find LLM's are really good at interpolating and translating. so if i made up a language and gave it the rules and asked it to translate i wouldn't expect it to be bad at it.
I have very limited experience with llms but
i've always thought of it as a compounding errors problem, once you get a small error early on it can compound and go completely off track later.
Google make almost all their money from search, an extremely lucrative property, which is under threat from all the new ai players.
So while they have a bunch of cool tech on the possibility horizon the only thing the market cares about is the ability to make money and there's some uncertainty on that front.
Is it communism to not allow people to buy up all the water supplies and sell it back to you at an extortionate rate?
The truth about the housing market is that it's not a free market anyway it's controlled by special interests, bad laws, zoning, local nimbys and councils the list goes on.
surely we could already do 1khz displays with OLED, but i assumed that the bandwidth required to meet that wouldn't be available on any of todays display outputs.
yeah i was thinking the same thing, at the very least it's not designed with accessibility in mind and could easily trick people who are more vision impaired.
i feel like lawyers will be able to legally keep AI out of their field for a while yet. they have the tools at their disposal to do so and a huge incentive.
it is a national risk but i imagine there's also economic / trade grounds in the fact that china doesn't let american companies compete in their market.
I don't see any reason for it not to be in the purview of government.