It is very basic maths as well (that evades most small time landlords).
100% occupancy at 90% of the market price with high quality tenants makes you more money than 80% occupancy + agent advertising / finding fees at full market price with bad tenants.
Most people in the country dont give a shit about historical injustices and are worried about how they are going to pay their rent or put food on the table today.
> What is it specifically that company management is worried about?
As with all hype techs, even the most talented management are barely literate in the product. When talking about their new trillion $ product they must take their talking points from the established literature and "fake it till they make it".
If the other big players say "billions of parameters" you chuck in as many as you can. If the buzz words are "tokens" you say we have lots of tokens. If the buzz words are "safety" you say we are super safe. You say them all and hope against hope that nobody asks a simple question you are not equipped to answer that will show you dont actually know what you are talking about.
The experiment uses a 100-80-100 model: workers get 100% of the pay for working 80% of the time in exchange for delivering 100% of their usual output.
Would only be assuming, however, given the success it would appear that it was achieved.
fwiw I do not think that I have encountered a "knowledge worker" who couldnt do 100% of their job in 80% of the time with minimal effort. Manual jobs / service jobs obviously different of course.
The political class and media STILL to actively ridicule China's Great Firewall while proposing the same thing while claiming that it is "completely different".
Wait till you hear their thoughts on the disgusting social credit system ...