I think something like this is obviously the future. I'm looking forward to writing into some UI "schedule a dental cleaning appointment ASAP any nearby clinic" for it to just work.
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Remote: Preferably
Willing to relocate: Yes
Technologies: React, Node.js, JavaScript, .NET (in short)
Resume: https://knyazev.io/resume/
Email: [email protected]
About me:
I'm an experienced full-stack engineer with experience leading features at well-known names (Amazon, Airbnb, ESPN Bet).
Professionally, I've mainly been writing React in my last few position, but I am very well versed in designing backends as well.
The problem aren’t interpretative courts, its unclear laws.
The pencil example is all fun and games, but swap « buying mechanical pencils » with « sending people to prison », and then it makes more sense why some people prefer the judiciary branch to constrain the power of HR when there’s ambiguity.
> Are you saying that you want to pay to be provided with harmful text
This existence of “harmful text” is a bit silly, but lets not dwell on it.
The answer to your question is that I want to be able to generate whatever the technology is capable of. Imagine if Microsoft Word would throw an error if you tried to write something against modern dogmas.
If you wish to avoid seeing harmful text, I think that market is well-served today. I can’t imagine there not being at the very least a checkbox to enable output filtering for any ideas you think are harmful.
How is it not true? Instead of tracking data and function calls over a unified stacktrace, you track Things and Messages over databases, queues, and logs —- none of which you can trivially attach a debugger to.
I generally like event-driven architecture, but I need to admit that debuggability is sacrificed where it matters most.
These acquihire posts read so cheery. Why? You’re killing a product that at least 1 person depended on. Why are you pretending that this is exciting for them?
What was the script?