I downvote anyone replying "correlation is not causation" to almost any scientific news. If you think the half a dozen PhDs with decades of experience involved in the study don't know that, you just wanna sound smart for internet points.
Submissions
Sigil Review: Semantic Diffs for Agents and Reviewers
inerte.github.io
2 points·by inerte··0 comments
I embedded Sigil's docs in its CLI so LLMs can write Sigil
inerte.github.io
2 points·by inerte··0 comments
Prevent confidential data leaks at compile time with labelled types in Sigil
inerte.github.io
1 points·by inerte··2 comments
Show HN: Sigil – A new programming language for AI agents
5 points·by inerte··5 comments
How the US got left behind in the electric car race
bbc.com
72 points·by inerte··143 comments
MoonBit: Exploring the Design of an AI-Native Language Toolchain
moonbitlang.com
1 points·by inerte··0 comments
Inside the story that enraged OpenAI
technologyreview.com
4 points·by inerte··0 comments
Does Visual Studio rot the mind? (2005)
charlespetzold.com
105 points·by inerte··100 comments
Big Companies Harvest Our Data. This Is Who They Think I Am
nytimes.com
2 points·by inerte··0 comments
Ask HN: My mom is a pediatrician. Best temporary remote consultation ideas?
2 points·by inerte··0 comments
Is My Host Fast Yet?
godaddy.com
2 points·by inerte··0 comments
A Git choose-your-own-adventure
sethrobertson.github.io
2 points·by inerte··0 comments
Refactoring React Components for Redux Performance
yahooeng.tumblr.com
3 points·by inerte··0 comments
Breaking Away: Brazil's indie developers are thinking globally
But basically world is a bit more narrow, that moment where your code touches the outside world (logging, http, etc), you can swap that. It's sorta like DI but deliberately narrower, only the moments where code touches the outside world are swappable.. With DI in theory you can replace anything, which has its benefits, but at least personally I am not a big fan of mocks, except when they touch the outside world. So that's what's replaceable.
I learned in Brazil. Here in the California I asked my son's kindergarten teacher if she would teach cursive, and she said they don't teach calligraphy and I've never seen it described this way, but she's right.
Reporting on percentage of AI generated lines of code is very different from total lines of code. Yes I know both of them are missing what's the value delivered, but the later assumes the value is the number of lines, while the former assumes value is at least the same but delivered faster.
I know it has the same functionality, but it also looks like the Codex app which looks like Cursor Agents! Are they sharing some VS Code primitive here?
Same for me. I applied for engineering manager. Was told it was going to be a code review. I found a bunch of things that it could be improved, detected a very slow part / quadratic loop, but couldn't come up with the best algo to use. It was just leetcode in disguise.
I am getting so confused when to use what... agents, sub-agents, tasks, team mates, /goal, /loop, and now workflow. Each with different degrees of effort.
Don't make me think.
All these knobs are also exposed in ChatGPT, which I am more familiar when chatting. Which one of the models? Do I go Instant, Thinking, Pro? Extended Pro? Oh no, maybe I need Deep Research.
Sometimes I think it's on purpose. I fear if I try a lowest knob, it will miss something. So turn everything up. And token usage goes up.
Dead Internet Theory and all. There is no going back. I don't think an online space can be designed to be safe from this. The AI agents can fully control our computers. All solutions that involve technology (software or hardware) are or will be flawed.
If I steal your luggage, do you expect to be paid to get it or that I return to you?
Waymo should have white-gloved this and sent Larry Page himself to deliver the luggage. This is horrible PR. Airlines will send you their luggage if misplaced. One day Waymo will drive-off with your toddler and ask you to file for adoption if you want them back.
To be fair my expectations is that those apps have done the prompt engineering, and schema, and tools (to query nutrition database), etc... and although they're not 100% consistent, the margin of errors should be narrow to the point that barely matter, and they should do a bit better than a random ChatGPT chat session.
Probably because the goal is to have more users, not necessarily profit per user. Netflix once had that "problem" and every lockdown increased the stock price.
I've tried and couldn't make it sound like Angine de Poitrine, it completely ignores the microtones. Sounds more like Polyphia. It does look like AdP is the answer to AI.... or we haven't trained the models with sufficient microtones, likely due to western music influence.
"inerte" is also my gmail username
I downvote anyone replying "correlation is not causation" to almost any scientific news. If you think the half a dozen PhDs with decades of experience involved in the study don't know that, you just wanna sound smart for internet points.