> despite saying they're "harmful", they've been everywhere for all these decades that a lot of other measures of quality of life have been increasing?
Might be unrelated (or not), but cancer rates have been exploding the last decades. Example via Google-Fu:
> Cancer cases in under-50s worldwide up nearly 80% in three decades, study finds
> What they were not doing was sitting in a classroom for 6-8 hours a day listening to someone talk and then going home and sitting indoors for the rest of the day […]
That is not a new occurrence, though. It has largely been like this for a 100 years now.
> Oh cool, something that wasn't a problem in the past now has a solution that can be bought through a variety of products and services.
Plastic additives and softeners have been linked to ADHD – and plastic is virtually omnipresent nowadays. ADHD presents differently in boys and girls. I wonder if there could be a relation.
Well, perhaps have some basic knowledge of the topic at hand before oversimplifying the matter by simply paraphrasing "cui bono", effectively hinting at heinous Jewish scheming being the crux of the matter.
All other things aside, it will also make food less nutritious:
> Research led by Sam Myers, Director of the Planetary Health Alliance at the Harvard Chan School, found that when food crops like wheat, corn, rice and soy are exposed to CO2 at levels predicted for 2050, the plants lose as much as 10% of their zinc, 5% of their iron, and 8% of their protein content.
There is no bet for you to take, but I hope you’ll find the time to think back to your foolishness once when we have resource wars and widespread famines due to simultaneous global breadbasket failure.
Might be unrelated (or not), but cancer rates have been exploding the last decades. Example via Google-Fu:
> Cancer cases in under-50s worldwide up nearly 80% in three decades, study finds
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/sep/05/cancer-cases...