Sure, pick one of their sources to support your claims. If they already did the job for you it should be very easy.
To reiterate your claims:
> Sweden has, more than any other country, faced an astounding and shocking rise of intense violence and organized crime, with shootings in the middle of cities and cafés, all linked to people that were openly accepted through its refugee programs.
1. Which link proves that Sweden has had a more shocking rise of intense violence and organized crime than all other countries in the world?
2. Which link proves that they are all linked to people that were openly accepted through its refugee programs?
Regarding 1. it would also be interesting to know which time period you are referring to, because that's pretty much a prerequisite for a claim like that.
You didn't link it because it was an interesting thesis, you linked it to back up your claims when I asked for a source. Which it didn't do. You still need to provide a source for your claims. You can also retract your claims of course, that's fine too.
> Sweden has, more than any other country, faced an astounding and shocking rise of intense violence and organized crime, with shootings in the middle of cities and cafés, all linked to people that were openly accepted through its refugee programs.
You claimed two things that I took issue with:
The rise of intense violence and organized crime is higher than in any other country.
All those crimes are linked to people openly accepted through its refugee programmes.
A student thesis about "The Ripple Effect of Gang Violence" does not back up these claims.
I am well aware that Sweden has had an increase in intense violence and organized crime in recent years, but that is not what you claimed. You were more specific.
More than any other country... I'm not too sure about that, there are a lot of countries on this planet. What period are you looking at? I assume relative numbers.
I'm also skeptical about your other claim that it's all linked to people that came to Sweden through refugee programs. Do you have any sources to back up your claims?
> As if it isn’t a problem that their CEO is supporting policies that go against everything that Mullvad stands for as a company.
Mullvads mission is about privacy and against mass surveillance. That mission has nothing to do with their co-CEOs personal stance on immigration. I don't necessarily see the conflict of interest that the blog talks about?