Are there jurisdictions that allow this? In my jurisdiction, that would be considered a constructive dismissal and legally treated the same way as a layoff with the same employer obligations.
I've tried the vanilla Earpods which are pretty much the wired version of that. Those ones at least stay in my ear, but my ear starts to hurt after 30 mins or so.
I'm the same and fixed the issue by getting some custom eartips made. They aren't cheap but have made my AirPods Pro usable.
On-ear headphones hurt my earlobes and over-ear headphones make my head get hot so I can't seem to find happiness anywhere. The custom eartips I think have gotten me the closest though!
I imagine it was a fat fingering. I’ve purchased MBPs for my org in person at an Apple Store because I needed them urgently and I had to call my Apple rep to manually assign the serials to our company in ABM.
GDPR can apply extraterritorially but not to the extent you're suggesting.
For example, I am an EU citizen living in Canada. GDPR does not apply to any company interacting with me. However, for a US citizen living in an EU country GDPR would apply to every company they interact with. Even US based companies.
Money. Certifying a system like that would cost a fortune and unless the operator is forced to do it or you give them a very compelling case that helps their profitability, it ain’t happening
I wouldn't say saying it came from the inside is unique to AI art. You very much need a welder's understanding of welding in order to be able to automate it for example.
I'd just say the scale is different. Old school automation just required one expert to guide the development of an automation. AI art requires the expertise of thousands.
I think this depends on how much friction side-loading ends up being. If I can just click a link and hit "run" like I can on a computer, yeah it could be an issue.
If it requires diving in to Settings or connecting the phone to a computer -- Facebook would never abandon the App Store, friction to using side-loading would be too high.
I think FTX acted fraudulently rather than breaking a securities or banking law. They told users they were 1:1 and didn’t gamble with user deposits but did it anyway.
The app store is a separate business than hardware. They don't have to delete already installed apps, but continuing to distribute them I imagine the US government definitely does have the power to stop.
This is a huge one -- value in outsourcing blame. If you're down because of a major provider outage in the news, you're viewed more as a victim of a natural disaster rather than someone to be blamed.
Also, the strange thing is it is off in both directions. I had a family member order a Model X with a 5 month delivery timeline. He was super surprised to get the call to arrange delivery 3 weeks later.
People who have video calls throughout the day constantly. I don't want to have to mess around setting up my phone on a stand and getting it connected every time I need to do a meeting.
Would the person operating the equipment initially own the image?
I say initially because they've likely signed some agreement with their employer that assigns copyright created through the course of employment to the employer...
The employer may have then signed an agreement in purchasing that equipment that assigns some rights over the image to the equipment manufacturer...
So I guess who knows? In the absence of a law explicitly giving the patient rights to their data, it is probably a super complicated, case-by-case answer.