No I have not, I am not convinced I should spend money on it (yet)
Using 'sadly' in your answer hints at triggering an emotional response, therefore I will ignore
You are a journalist according to your profile, and please don't get me wrong, but I like to use Mistral 7B, even if it is not as good as GPT4, but it only works for me if I want to be creative, but not accurate, e.g. marketing, writing condolences :(
I would not use it for anything serious
PS: I checked a few other comments here, and I am not the only one who thinks the same, so pointing me at another paid version is not a proof. All I am saying is that there is too much error for it to be more than a toy
To me the 'It didn’t get all of them' is what makes me think this AI thing is just a toy. Don't get me wrong, it's marvelous as it is, but it only is useful (I use ollama + mistral 7B) when I know nothing, if I do have some understanding of the topic at hand it just becomes plain wrong. Hopefully I will be corrected.
Originally called S+7, invented as part of the OuLiPo (OUvroir à la LIterature POtentielle which could be translated into English as WOrkshop for POtential LIterature, WOPOLI).
Thanks for asking, in short pure nonsense with the intention to attract derision. Google does know it? :-) Because I made it up. It is synonymous to grandiose without being pretentious and is originally meant to be used in some product marketing context. Are you Sir Ious?
Can what this guy is doing be done without making mistakes? Is this thread not good publicity? Does crazy_horse not sound pathetic and amedvednikov comparatively heroic? Could we not dream a little, please?