I think it's mostly a poorly worded change, with odd assertions that one can interpret as "why do you need x feature made for your blog made by Ai just use notepad and apache server for your blog".
The resource point is fair enough but as the blog post says they can make it a paid service for llm folks.
Not exactly, trolley problem is about a sacrifice, in this case the idea is no sacrifice, because failure is absolute, especially in that you gain nothing, Quis research is as useless to cite as Dr He, yes they both used certain scientific approaches, but clearly skipped medical and ethical concerns.
I sort of disagree, the issue is that he like so many professionals (prime agent, being the other) becoming youtubers uses their experiences to make their opinion the only opinion when said opinion is nuanced or plain wrong objectively.
It's more simple than that; lack of investment due to various factors among which some are due to regulations, but also because the lower ROI you get in the USA due to corporate culture, higher cost in general (wages, energy, resources, manufacturing, etc.), slower economic growth and so on.
Right, why did you feel the need to straw man me to somehow justify your victim complex?
You can cite me for when I said all arguments are FUD, or even that yours was.
And if your issue is that it's not ready, okay? That had nothing to do with my point.
So let me repeat, do you swear to never use a certain Linux kernel module because it has critical bugs? If yes okay good that is a most likely temporary technical argument so why spread FUD about it?
If you mean that there are times systemd has a critical bug; sure the same way x11, kernel modules or drivers have critical bugs are annoying.
You can always point to where I said you are a neckbeard, so I do not get the "hard time" angle.
You can not like systemd, but the arguments for it is silly, and that is fine it's your machine and I don't care as long as people stop spreading FUD on such awful grounds.
Say in contrast with BTRFS or BcacheFS there are genuine issues with those and there are technical philosophical arguments (I want journaling, I do not want or need CoW features, snapshot? never heard of her).
To this day I have not found a single modern argument against systemd that is a technical one (I tried systemd but it does not support x which openrc does), instead it's these vague bike shed arguments (Unix philosophy, anti-centralization and "bloat" ).
I can't wrap my head around it, since those 3 are a "you" problem, systemd is just a service manager it's you who decide to use other systemd parts.
Who is the elite here? The people nominated for the commission is by the national government of said country if anything blame the countries picking such self serving citizens to be part of the commission.
And if religion is proving anything then it's that naivety is running alarmingly high as the absurd amount of grifting and deliberate misinterpretation is growing.
The resource point is fair enough but as the blog post says they can make it a paid service for llm folks.
I think it's a bit an