260ft is around 79m. The bombs can penetrate around 60m of concrete. So one bomb, probably not, but they are able to follow each other in quick succession meaning 2 or three should be able to do the job quite easily, with accurate GPS positioning.
The question is unexplored territory, pun intended.
The FAA could deny approval for launch, but its unclear what the basis would be. What happens on Mars is out of it's jurisdiction, literally.
The UN governs Earth, not Mars. It could expand to cover Mars I suppose. It's the sort of pointless activity you could imagine the European Parliament obsessing over, but there is little they could do about an American launch company.
But the reality is we are centuries away from something approaching a land-rush on Mars, or actual competition between nations for control of anything.
I suspect it will be a "watch and wait and see" situation.
> By reading the source code, I realized that the incoming data was put into a fixed-size static buffer in the stack, and the payload was decrypted into another fixed-size buffer. There’s no boundary or size check.
This is not normal. It's amateurish in the extreme that leads to the only conclusion that whoever wrote this ZeroMQ thing is not a real software engineer. I.e. stay away at all costs.
The more I use ChatGPT, the useless I realize it is.
It looks impressive at first, until you realize it is like a trick pony. Don't get it to haul your luggage.
It gives apparently good summaries of sometimes complex topics. But then you ask it to explain things in more detail...welcome to a special hell of circular reasoning, inherent contradictions, and surprising about-faces that occur even when you ask a complementary question (complementary as in congruent not admiring).
ChatGPT: <long verbose answer...>
Me: Oh so your saying X implies Y but not Z? (which previous answer did)
ChatGPT: Apologies for causing confusion, I misspoke.... (go on to give a worse response now)
Me: But your first response was OK, I just wanted to clarify XYZ...
ChatGPT: <now gives a response with directly conflicting statements>