I met an underwriter through synagogue who works at the predatory lending office mentioned in this article (Queen Funding LLC). I will have a talk with him about this..
I know a bunch of beautiful, accomplished women with great jobs who can't find good men to start a family with. Young mens' failure-to-launch is becoming a big problem....
> Men do not work as teachers because the media has painted men as "sex crazed". Most mothers would be uncomfortable with having a male 4th grade teacher for their daughter.
> Many women would be uncomfortable having a male gynecologist or a male nurse helping them deliver their baby.
And what is your opinion of the above bit of my previous post (since you avoided that in your answer?)
Possibility 1: Male-dominated fields discriminate against females.
Possibility 2: Those fields are male-dominated because they can't get into female-dominated fields.
Men do not work as teachers because the media has painted men as "sex crazed". Most mothers would be uncomfortable with having a male 4th grade teacher for their daughter.
Many women would be uncomfortable having a male gynecologist or a male nurse helping them deliver their baby.
> Doctors (high prestige, high pay) are about 70% male.
Sorry but this breaks your narrative: 60% of new MDs each year are female. However: female MDs are more likely to quit the profession or go part time in order to raise kids. Again, this might show anti-male discrimination because it is not socially acceptable for male doctors to quit work to stay home with the kids.
---
The above suggests to me that there's indeed a huge level of bias and discrimination, but not in the way you think.
Maybe anti-male sexism prevalent in the health care and education fields is causing women to prefer those fields.
Fix the sexism in health care/education. Elementary teachers should be 50% men. Nurses should be 50% men. Instead those fields are 90%(!) women! That is a HUGE level of bias and discrimination
Regardless of if theres a equivalence there or not, he's right that Texas and Georgia are in the unusual position of both having a ton of jobs and very reasonable housing market.
Granted SF is space constrained, but there is no excuse for other parts of Cali to be so expensive.
All employers within San Francisco pay a large amount of taxes to the city for each employee. Those taxes more than pay for the cost of road use of their employees.
They should be outlawed for camping too... the importance of keeping bacteria from growing immune outweighs the small risk of getting a stomach bug while camping
Sanitizer should ONLY be legal for use in hospitals
Most biologists are either in academic or government employed and do not need to even think about money/making a profit.
People working in CS are mostly in industry and do not have 10+ year timeframes to leisurely discuss ideas.
And what CS inventions are as impactful as atomic bombs (as someone mentioned above?) I cannot think of any CS inventions that warrant such extended ethical discussion.
The only exception would be computer scientists working on weapons in the defense industry. They should absolutely be held back by ethical concerns like this.
> It is evident that such a legislation is hostile to the poor and favorable only to the rich
I feel hopeless that this will ever change. In a extremely liberal city like San Francisco, where nearly every citizen follows progressive politics, NIMBYs have passed laws the enrich wealthy renters and make it hard for the poor to afford to live in the city.
If San Francisco cannot get this right, no one can.