Me too.
Usually the bbc/guardian/telegraph all have the same stories, just with a different slant.
BUT for Snowden leaks there is a black hole, with only the guardian covering it. (Though everyone covers personal gossip about Snowden, of course).
Scary.
The full quote is:
"It’s also very easy to turn Common Lisp REPL code into unit tests, which I tend to
do a lot. That is something that’s very hard to do with object-oriented code, which is
why idiotic things like dependency injection and Test-Driven Development have to be
invented.
– Vladimir Sedach"
How does this compare to lisp, where you can break straight into editing code, inspecting variables, etc, and then continue?
This seems to be something Clojure really lacks, but I never see it explicitly stated in 'why you should use Clojure' articles, nor in Clojure books. What I want to read is a sober 'pros and cons of using Clojure' article, so I can properly judge whether I should switch.
We are not expanding. Size of e.g. a hydrogen atom is not changing.