Well I sure didn't think it was comprised of 1.8 million weak ill people, hence why I thought saying HALF of the population would need medical care was fear mongering.
Is the idea that women spend an absurd amount of money to look hot at work similar to the idea that womens bodies are sexual in the first place? I think women sexualize themselves for the most part. Obviously there are some conservative women, and some full on prostitutes with day jobs, so sure all types exist. But in general I think women use their sexuality too much at work.
I think this is fear mongering. Last summer my father was saying it was too hot to function and we should put off the interior house project we had planned.
It was 108.
As he said this, we were at a stop light next to a Speedy Oil Change facility. Shop doors rolled open, guys in long pants, thick shirts, changing oil and rotating tires.
People that don't work physically underestimate what the human body can do.
I'm tired of all your confused points.
Nowhere did I say I have trouble at work but not on the street.
Nowhere did anyone say anything about women in general not working at OPs company. It was clear this was an attractive woman by these guys standards, not some average woman.
My main point is that women are already so coddled, and allowed to use their sexuality in the work place so much, that OPs company not hiring one chick is basically irrelevant.
I behave perfectly normally. But this isn't a thread about me, it's about the employees at OPs company. The management team must have known that with the amount of men they have hired, atleast a few might be prone to getting weak for women. So they took action.
This is basically your #1 fault. You make a stupid claim. I tell you more details and ask you to adjust your worldview based on the info you've received. You then say "nope, not changing a thing!"
We are on a tech forum, talking on a thread where a tech company decided not to hire a hot woman because they cause distractions and problems.
So, I mentioned that even Bill Gates, basically the most popular tech person in the world, married his coworker, and then cheated on her because he couldn't control himself. Aka, even elite tech people with everything to lose, can't turn down a pretty young girl. Thus, I understand why OPs company did what they did.
You can keep talking in circles about what you think the world should be like. I'm talking about what it's actually like.
You seem to have trouble with words or basic logic.
Almost every post on this thread here talks about many women making choices to sexualize the workplace. I did not say I have a problem with people with breasts. I have a problem with someone accenting their breasts, and showing the top portion of them, at work. This isn't a gender issue, it's an actions issue.
2) I do think women have agency. You're the one acting like they are soulless blobs that can't make proper decision on how to look in the work place. And I have zero problems with women, but there are all types in a company and you shouldn't ignore that.
For example, I don't steal. But I wouldn't leave a laptop on the passenger seat of a parked car. This has nothing to do with my own personal actions.
We definitely are humans with agency. I use mine to mostly avoid women at work.
Women use theirs to accent colors in their hair, brighten their lips, make their smell travels several feet around them, color their nails, and wear tight clothing that accents their body.
1) you avoid hiring thieves. Companies do this everyday through background checks. Similar to how this company avoided hiring an extra hot woman. Since you can't not hire men, you have to resort to removing the problem from the other side.