It's extremly unlikely that a judge will accept this approval and as far as I know, it has never happened. The approval could be ruled 'sittenwidrig'. Otherwise the person that approves has to be 'approvable'. There are high barriers to prove that the approval is legaly valid.
The most famous case is the 'Kannibale von Rotenburg'. Even though the victim aggreed he was sentenced to life for murder. You may find a theoretical loophole but in reality I don't think you would get away with this.
> meaning companies are accountable
for ensuring their practices and processes do not give undue amplification to harmful and
illegal content
Problem is that this will lead to "upload filters" and who will decide what actually is harmful and illegal?
I would prefer it (as a EU citizen) if Mozilla would just shut up and concentrate on Firefox.