Pi.dev is an open-source CLI coding agent by @badlogic. It lets you steer the agent while it works, but steering puts future tasks into the context — and LLMs rush through early tasks when they see what's coming next (goal anchoring). True Queue hides queued tasks from the agent entirely. Type +task to queue, the agent only sees one task at a time. ctrl+q opens an editor overlay to reorder the queue while the agent runs.
Does anyone know when will possibly arrive 1M context windows to at least MAX x20 subscriptions for claude code? I would even pay x50 if it allowed that. API usage is too expensive.
I disagree with the "confidence trick" framing completely. My belief in this tech isn't based on marketing hype or someone telling me it's good – it's based on cold reality of what I'm shipping daily. The productivity gains I'm seeing right now are unprecedented. Even a year ago this wouldn't have been possible, it really feels like an inflection point.
I'm seeing legitimate 10x gains because I'm not writing code anymore – I'm thinking about code and reading code. The AI facilitates both. For context: I'm maintaining a well-structured enterprise codebase (100k+ lines Django). The reality is my input is still critically valuable. My insights guide the LLM, my code review is the guardrail. The AI doesn't replace the engineer, it amplifies the intent.
Using Claude Code Opus 4.5 right now and it's insane. I love it. It's like being a writer after Gutenberg invented the printing press rather than the monk copying books by hand before it.
Is there any easy way to implement this pattern in AWS RDS deployments where we need to deploy multiple times a day and need it to be done in few minutes?
Their docs show throughput limits (e.g., 4 CPU = 60 errors/sec), but what happens during error spikes?
If my app crashes and blasts hundreds of errors in seconds, does Telebugs have built-in rate limiting or backpressure? Or do I need to overprovision hardware/implement throttling myself?
With SaaS tools, spike protection is their problem. With self-hosted, I’m worried about overwhelming my own infrastructure without adding complexity.
I’m experiencing something similar. We have a codebase of about 150k lines of backend code. On one hand, I feel significantly more productive - perhaps 400% more efficient when it comes to actually writing code. I can iterate on the same feature multiple times, refining it until it’s perfect.
However, the challenge has shifted to code review. I now spend the vast majority of my time reading code rather than writing it. You really need to build strong code-reading muscles. My process has become: read, scrap it, rewrite it, read again… and repeat until it’s done. This approach produces good results for me.
The issue is that not everyone has the same discipline to produce well-crafted code when using AI assistance. Many developers are satisfied once the code simply works. Since I review everything manually, I often discover issues that weren’t even mentioned. During reviews, I try to visualize the entire codebase and internalize everything to maintain a comprehensive understanding of the system’s scope.
Is there some clean way to pass components or just html to components using this framework without having them in strings? This is issue I see with most of these approaches.
Sadly this article just compares pricing. When we were using Google instead of HERE, results were mostly better but not worth the price. I would rather see some opinions on the quality of results and examples where each API shines and fails. Price without mentioning features and quality is incomplete information. People wont make decisions just based on the price.
My take is: its either there with all of its features and popularity or its not. The argument that it will be taken down if its more popular seems to me fundamenally wrong.
Socials:
- linkedin.com/in/krystofee - github.com/krystofee
Interests:
Climbing, Cycling, Hiking, Music, Outdoor Activities, Programming, Startups, UI/UX Design, Web Development
---
Head of development @ retino.com