At work I use opus max Fast
It hardy ever fails for no reason even if I forget to give it all the right context.
At home i run sonnet, and it does not get what I meant or expected 20-35% of the time.
Due to the enormous difference in cost, depending on the value of your time (hourly rate) that might be a nett benefit.
Sonnet being faster alone would not be worth the failure rate for me.
At home i just not want to pay more than 20 bucks for incidental projects.
And opus max would just consume my tokens in one round.
LLM are way older. The Nobel prize for it shows how they made many of the breakthroughs decades ago
ChatGTP was the popular breakthrough.
Even then your Smartphone keyboard has been using an LLM for a decade.
Because optimizing for security is sometimes specifically decreasing convenience.
In the original (first) article some of those considerations are discussed.
So I was curious what they mean by sending out an id for gps. Since that seems to me not something that is happening for all types of GPS implementations.
>But if there was a way to correctly tell people: "look, this smartphone is 20% more expensive, but it will last twice as long and it will be more convenient for you in ways you can't understand right now", nobody would go for the worse quality, right?
I am not sure if we are living in the same world.
No most people absolutely do not make rational choices like that.
No matter how you tell them.
Most importantly what you think is best for people is stil a perspective. Especially in the context of tv.
Very fascinating read. Especially the reviewers comments linked at the end. The point is that alignment after training is much more complicated and limited than it might appear. And they make that point convincingly.
>"The huge gap between those ages could change our understanding about how humans spread across the world. If the ancestors of today’s non-Africans didn’t sweep across other continents until 47,000 years ago, then those older sites must have been occupied by earlier waves of humans who died off without passing down their DNA to the people now living in places like China and Australia."
But at the end gets a bit more balanced
>"He Yu, a paleogeneticist at Peking University in Beijing who was not involved in either study, said that the mystery wouldn’t be solved until scientists find DNA in some of the ancient Asian fossils.
“We still need early modern human genomes from Asia to really talk about Asia stories,” Dr. Yu said."
That would be in the same order of magnitude of an average daily commute with an older car.