Created a react-doctor style cli to deterministically scan for misconfigurations, missing observability, and security posture.
Now working on extending it so vibe-coders can secure their apps too!
A version of it powers my local rubber duck thoughts and voice note store.
Like an explicit chatgpt memory store, helps with information fomo cause I know finding the needle in haystack would be easy.
It would, probably, be cost prohibitive to use 10M context to it's fullest each time.
I instead hope for to have an api to access to the context as a datastore, so like RAG we can control what to store but unlike rag all data stays within context.
Extremely Passionate ( and Fresh graduate ) FullStack developer based in India/Abu Dhabi. Have experience working at startups and corporate. Previously Engineering Intern, doing qa and creating testing pipelines, at a startup in Paris. Interested in Backend/Fullstack, but also open to Data/MLE, positions.
I don't follow enough users to have a flourishing newsfeed, so facebook gives me suggestions to follow pages and shows posts from those pages. These suggestions are purely based on what facebook thinks I may like.
With people having enough sources to feed their newsfeed, facebook decides the order and cherry picks what posts are shown.
> Is facebook wrong for showing you the things you said you want it to show you?
I do agree with this. Coming to a solution to this would be hard problem. Users will have to give finer information about types of posts people like from a creator. I doubt there are any real work incentives for a big company to build a system like this.
By adding content to user's newsfeed, they ( facebook's algorithm ) have made a explicit decision to share the piece of content and implicit decision that they deem the post safe for sharing. In that case shouldn't a speaker operator be responsible for the voices they amplify?
-| ratin(dot)kumar(dot)2k@gmail(dot)com |-