The converse is how helpful cars are. It allows people to have the ability commute from areas they live at to where they work. It brings down the cost of living by expanding the commute availability circle, instead of driving up land values for the desirable areas.
It was not just Google. All of the search engines have an initial period of being good then when they get to a state of market domination or market penetration, the SEO and large companies with money show up. The SEO people game the system, while the people in companies with money, simply pay to be at the top of the chart or surreptitiously give money to be at the top of the chart. The surgeons are fine when they start getting market traction that the issue starts to pop up.
The internet died in 2016, when Google announced they would do more to influence elections.
After that, the powers that are in charge have engaged in social manipulation to try and steer the internet to provide only the ”approved” concepts.
Gemini’s results on blacks proliferating in the confederate army is an example of how far it has gone.
Wikipedia is not trustworthy on articles on notable people (watch when an election kicks off and how manipulated they are) and Google tries to openly manipulate search results because of the SEO decisions made years ago.
Our only hope is Web3 and an ability to host stuff on there.
If you are saying a better state would allow them on social media, something that has been shown to be detrimental to children under eighteen, how can it be a better state?
Google had a long running joke on their website where if you searched for idiot in the White House under the Bush 2 regime, the first response was Bush. People thought it was funny, others complained and nothing was done.
When the Obama regime came in, it was fixed within days.
That was the start of the google not being apolitical internally. Since then, it has been going downhill because they constantly break their algorithm for whatever they are into this week.
They were right.
All of the institutions where the ratings come back to the professors / staff have had a detrimental effect on academic rigor: need to earn the grade is out the door, easy programs / lessons, get the good assessments, move on.
Most schools have one day a week with early release. That is not a feature of charter schools.
Additionally, kid’s are only as good as their parents can enable. Some parents see the schools as a babysitting service. Others see it as a reprieve from having their kids in the house.
If you have never been to a school to volunteer, go do it. You will see quite quickly that there are students who disrupt the classroom beyond teaching. The teacher must devolve the class to the lowest common denominator and thus the group suffers
Good. The faster we can force HR departments to do their job properly instead of just short handing it by saying: needs college degree x and ten year experience in swift, the better.
Climate change or anthropogenic climate change is a starting point for this issue.
We have had climate change since day one of earth. We can see it in the charts, data, etc. the issue is how much impact do the humans contribute?
If people were serious about carbon footprint, nuclear power plants would be built. But we are not serious, instead we have grifting policies that lead to wasted solutions: Solyndra, wind farms, solar farms, etc.
Then on top of all of this, the people in charge find ways to encourage coal, look at how Germany and the rest of the first worlds tried to bankrupt Pakistan by driving up the price of natural gas. Pakistan, China, and every country who saw that are going with coal.
The people who say climate denialism should not be tolerated are not serious about what they propose, because their solutions are not based in reality.
Tell that to the Chinese who are not subject to the diversity standards and see how their economy is doing. They could accelerate the domination if only they diversified.
Climate change or anthropogenically influenced climate change?
And during the seventies is was global cooling.
The whole thing is a farce, until the argument is pro nuclear and anti renewables, it is a joke.
Glad the oil companies are properly allocating their resources. They will move to non-west companies and still make money. The whole coal burning from Germany proves the green movement is a joke.
That is incorrect. If you read through their arguments, you will see a long list of documents to pull from.
When you see made up concepts and things that make no sense, then you may say that. I am looking at you 9th district.
The issue at play is how the government is seen by the people in charge, it is an exciting time to see those in charge try to bend the rules to get the judges to accept it. Look at how Obama claimed the care act was not a tax until it went to the court and then it became a tax to slip by.